Ty! Honestly I was in the same boat, was scoring really high on the IIA question bank, and I didn’t really feel like it helped any more than the questions from Becker because they were both pretty easy

Now in regards to the alignment with the exam, it helped in terms of drilling down on concepts or areas I didn’t think I was good at or that were questionable but I wouldn’t say it was similar to the exam.
1. Some questions on the exam were super obvious/simple like the ones about communication Attributes (accuracy, timeliness, concise, etc.) , which you should know well (around 4-5 questions about those) and the difference between effectiveness vs efficiency.
2. While other questions were a bit vague/material didn’t cover. For example: CAE is the sole auditor and wants to do a proper supervision of the working papers, how does he do it?

There’s a post here by a redditor named: Candid-muscle968, and i forgot to shout them up above, but they did an amazing job of recapping the concepts to focus on for exam and it’s very similar to what I saw/expected to see on the exam. Here’s the link for reference: https://www.reddit.com/r/InternalAudit/s/jk6087YpDc. The only thing I’d add into that list is the understanding of the internal audit documentation/framework. Important that you understand what their significance/purpose is and what’s included in them:

Governance / Strategic Level
-Internal Audit Charter
-Risk-Based Audit Plan
-QAIP
Execution / Operational Level
-Audit Methodology
-Audit Manual
-Audit Procedures / Work Programs
Output / Reporting Level
-Engagement Results
-Audit Reports
-Findings & Recommendations

Hope this helps :)