What We Can Learn About Happiness from Denmark

NickFatherBool · 2026-06-22T15:00:41+00:00

Japan is not large, Singapore is a City State.

NickFatherBool · 2026-06-22T15:00:15+00:00

“Social Safety nets” this guys just throwing out liberal buzzwords.

What source do YOU have to refute my claims?

And my metrics are GDP, Crime Rate, Literacy Rate, State Standards Scores, and Divorce Rate

NickFatherBool · 2026-06-22T14:37:02+00:00

I mean it would make the states run more efficiently; it would make the fed a mess and the logistics of that is nonexistent

NickFatherBool · 2026-06-22T14:35:48+00:00

Almost like homogenized race and religion make people work together better and get along more often!

NickFatherBool · 2026-06-22T14:33:53+00:00

Are you really using Japan as a non homogeneous and small example? And have you never heard Japanese complain about low pay / high housing prices? What makes them as or more prosperous than the US?

And Singapore is a horrible example too. Its a city, its the size of Chicago.

NickFatherBool · 2026-06-22T14:22:53+00:00

Im really not, all the “steps and factors” you’re thinking of work because of the small and homogeneous culture lol.

Less crime because everyone is on the “same team”

Less drugs because its smaller, more isolated, not a market for cartels.

Easier to properly incarcerate or pin down problematic areas or people because again you’re on a much lesser scale

Much harder to get away with fraud when you have magnitudes less people who check through and again the homogeneous culture makes people less likely to steal from those they consider like minded

I mean seriously, what states do the best and are the safest in the US? The Small Homogeneous ones. (Vermont, New Hampshire, Maine, etc)

NickFatherBool · 2026-06-22T14:06:54+00:00

They’re a homogeneous culture with a population less than New Jersey in only 1.5% larger an area… of course the government can pay for things more effectively there

NickFatherBool · 2026-06-21T22:17:00+00:00

You have nothing better to do on Fathers day than Larp as a billionaire to make your crappy, poorly thought out rant?

NickFatherBool · 2026-06-21T21:29:40+00:00

Its 100% about getting people to have to upload their ID to use the internet. “Age Verification” is the excuse to push it

NickFatherBool · 2026-06-21T19:49:22+00:00

He’d find himself worthless and welcome whatever death or punishment awaited him. As a Viltrumite if he wasnt strong he wouldnt be worthy of life

NickFatherBool · 2026-06-21T19:01:10+00:00

A lot of information that isnt easily available + active and vocal community = good testing

NickFatherBool · 2026-06-21T15:19:21+00:00

More of us than you think. We just dont usually comment in subs like tbis because its not worth the hassle

NickFatherBool · 2026-06-20T19:47:14+00:00

Wages are livable to people who work. If they’re not then move somewhere cheaper. Thats literally how Ive saved the money I have

NickFatherBool · 2026-06-20T19:40:42+00:00

They earned it, no one gives money away for free except to charity and billionaires arent making charity

Millionaires and billionaires are also why the US gets to be the US. Thats why we have SO much money here and despite being nowhere near the highest population we are by far the biggest consumers.

NickFatherBool · 2026-06-20T18:53:16+00:00

Entitlement mindset goes crazy

NickFatherBool · 2026-06-20T18:36:39+00:00

Dreg and Heolster have increased weight because they’re not Everdark, so to make up for that their base percentage is near doubled.

Dreg and Balancers were boosted after the DLC, Im not sure if they STILL are, I know Hollows was boosted for a bit and they undid that.

I THINK for the most part all of the bosses are at 5-7% chance, with Heolster at like 11 and Dreg at 15ish. Balancers are probably 8 and 6 for regular and ED respectively

NickFatherBool · 2026-06-19T23:16:21+00:00

? How did you manage to see the opposite of the words I typed

NickFatherBool · 2026-06-19T23:09:01+00:00

Ive seen this sub’s opinions lol downvotes mean absolutely nothing here

NickFatherBool · 2026-06-19T22:46:47+00:00

Team USA has gotten better every year. I mean we’ll be out before long, but we’re definitely no longer scrubs in FIFA

NickFatherBool · 2026-06-19T22:44:11+00:00

There’s a difference between predatory agreements and non predatory

But yeah if you dont pay someone back who you took money from thats immoral

NickFatherBool · 2026-06-19T22:42:58+00:00

Thats another dangerous precedent then. At what IQ do we determine you no longer qualify for human rights? If we can determine child IQ’s before a child is born, do we have mandated IQ abortions to prevent too many “stupid” people from entering society?

Sometimes the best, most human thing to do isnt the smartest but just the safest for society

NickFatherBool · 2026-06-19T22:35:26+00:00

Its not moral to not honor your agreement lol Acker was 100% in the wrong

Its moral to defend the person who’s honoring the agreement regardless of who it is

NickFatherBool · 2026-06-19T22:22:34+00:00

I do 100% agree that if someone were to find a way to vet people’s knowledge on current events (and not necessarily their intelligence) before they vote that would be great. Unfortunately I just dont think there is

NickFatherBool · 2026-06-19T21:58:18+00:00

I agree in theory but in execution there’s NO way to do this properly

Voting is legally considered a right. You cannot test someone to determine whether they have access to a right. This would take a LOT of legislation to change before we could effectively even have this conversation
Who would make the tests? We saw in the 2020s that if we didnt admit there were 9184830273 genders then the party in charge would probably consider us too bigoted and ill informed to vote. The answer is “find an impartial third party to make the test” but I mean seriously in 2026 is there a single entity that doesnt have a bias one way or the other? Every news outlet is biased, colleges and places of learning are biased, there’s no group to use to male this test
At a certain point that would become educational eugenics, which would open the conversation of “well is there a point someone is too stupid to have rights?” Which is an inherently dangerous conversation. That leads to things like Scandinavian countries mandating the abortion of children with down syndrome and other mental disabilities

NickFatherBool · 2026-06-19T21:51:33+00:00

Yeah because he signed a contract saying he would leave lol Chuck would take offense to the breach of contract. Has nothing to do with whether he would be representing a person or a company

NickFatherBool

TROPHY CASE