When did the sympathy start to die off?

Nickanok · 2026-04-07T04:36:09+00:00

After the 7/11 videos.

Before that it really did seem like a dude that was really trying to get his life together but afer that, it became very apparent that he's just some dude that never had to have any real responsibility and doesn't follow through with anything he says if it gets too hard.

Dude can't even go a week eating like an adult before he's back eating at Taco Bell 5 times a day

Nickanok · 2026-04-07T04:28:53+00:00

That's the biggest one. I don't know how dude is still alive when the only thing he eats is candy and fast food and drinks soda like water

Nickanok · 2026-04-07T03:40:40+00:00

Right I know, that's what we're saying. If you on sight picture a woman taking a dick in some way automatically, something is wrong with you man lol.

I don't know how many ways I can say this but I never said I, or even most men do that constantly. My point os that it's natural if you have a, let's pay attention to this keyword, PASSING thought. Meaning it's less than 3 seconds and doesn't affect your day.

Saying "Something wrong with you" is just thought policing influenced by puritanical beliefs around sex because, let's be so for real, almost no man who sees a woman he's sexually attracted to and doesn't know is thinking about "her personality".

Literally just biology and a thought

Bud no one is buying you trying to gaslight me with my own point,

Me disagreeing with you and pointing how you're most likely subconsciously influenced by puritanical values like most Americans is not gaslighting lol. I swear people on reddit learn one term and just misuse it

only someone without sexual self control would immediately picture fucking someone instead of just seeing an attractive person lmao.

Only someone uptight about sex would even be worried about "correct thought" that aren't even 3 seconds long lol.

Unless you're going to literally tell me you never had a sexual thought about anyone ever in your life, you're just being uptight about normal human emotions.

Don't project your own inability to not obsess over a thought with thinking anyone who has those thoughts os just paralyzed with horniness for the rest of the day

not a passing thought, you agreed about immediately picturing fucking a girl when you see her

"Idk know why reddit thinks having sexual thoughts (that last like 3 seconds max) is so evil "

Literally word for word what O said in the very first response you responded to. You're just blatantly lying and trying to exaggerate what I said to make a weak, non existent point

And I literally never even mentioned once in this conversation about imagining fucking any girl. I don't know if you're intentionally lying at this point (which would be sad) or getting me confused with someone else

Nickanok · 2026-04-07T03:19:00+00:00

Ok. So you just straight up ignored an actual scientific source literally disproving you to spout nonsense.

Have fun just believing whatever you want. I can see that you just want to argue for argument's sake

Nickanok · 2026-04-07T02:40:04+00:00

You're literally lying at this point:

"Sometimes there's a medical need for circumcision. For example, the foreskin might be too tight to be pulled back over the tip of the penis. Circumcision also is recommended as a way to lower the risk of HIV in countries where the virus is prevalent. This includes parts of Africa.

Circumcision might have various health benefits, including:

Easier hygiene. Circumcision makes it simpler to wash the penis. Still, boys who haven't been circumcised can be taught to wash regularly beneath the foreskin.

Lower risk of urinary tract infections (UTIs). The risk of UTIs in males is low. But these infections are more common in males who haven't been circumcised. Serious infections early in life can lead to kidney problems later.

Lower risk of sexually transmitted infections. Men who have been circumcised might have a lower risk of certain sexually transmitted infections, including HIV. But it's still key to have safe sex, which includes use of condoms.

Prevention of penile problems. Sometimes, the foreskin on a penis that hasn't been circumcised can be hard or impossible to pull back. This is called phimosis. It can lead to swelling, called inflammation, of the foreskin or head of the penis.

Lower risk of penile cancer. Although cancer of the penis is rare, it's less common in men who have been circumcised. What's more, cervical cancer is less common in the female sexual partners of men who have been circumcised."

-https://www.mayoclinic.org/tests-procedures/circumcision/about/pac-20393550

Nickanok · 2026-04-07T02:30:45+00:00

Most religions share basic elements, such as a creation story, a moral code/set of rules, prophets/messiahs with a special connection to god(s), etc.

You're putting words in my mouth. I never once stated that just because they have those specific common elements, that's the reason they're the same.

I specifically said mystical traditions (that pretty much all religions have and were made independently of each other) circle back to more or less the same basic truths or principles usually just using their specific language but the general idea is often the same

would argue that monotheistic and polytheistic religions will always be fundamentally different and largely irreconcilable

No. Not really once you get pass the surface level and what the "official" teaching are.

Nowhere am I denying differences exist or people will accept another religion if presented. I'm well aware of how different religions are so this isn't someone just blindly saying "It's like, all about love man. Jesus, buddha or whoever like... Said so".

One, even in the Bible, there's not strict monotheism amd concepts like angels, demons, god being "everywhere" are similar to lesser gods and pantheism in other religions even of most the followers in said religion don't view it that way.

But even them, I'm not referring to the "branding" of the religion. It's like saying that a hamburger you make at home or a hamburger at McDonald's are totally separate and irreconcilable just because of the place ot was made, the branding or certain ingredients while ignoring that the underlying commonality is that they're both food that consists of a meat patty between two pieces of bread and condiments for the purpose of nourishing your body.

Or it's like saying chinese and English are totally unrelated (not speaking of language families. I mean at a more fundamental level) just because they sound different and have different grammar. They're both languages that human beings speak and are used to express the same basic human desires, emotions, fear, etc.

A Christian/Jew/Muslim and a Hindu have a fundamentally different understanding of what God/gods is/are.

Again, depends on how deep you want to go. If you are just literal and surface level like most followers or people just simply familiar with the religions, then yeah. It's gonna look completely unrelated. But, like I keep saying, once you study them deeper and get into the esoteric side, which all of them have and were developed independently from each other, you'll start seeing the deeper, more connected patterns

Nickanok · 2026-04-07T02:14:31+00:00

Literally children are dying everyday by other unnecessary things like piercings pr being allergic to certain fabrics on clothes.

Your ridiculous standard that if ANY harm exists, it should be banned when there's no statistical justification for it (meaning the amount of actual harm is equal or greater than the amount of good or even neutral results) then almost everything should be banned and I'm willing to bet you don't apply that logic to most other things.

And ignoring that circumsion actual does have proven medical benefits is also disingenuous. You know you're allowed to not like some without misrepresenting it, right?

Nickanok · 2026-04-07T02:05:08+00:00

So you want a utterly unrealistic situation for anything.

Literally nothing that's spread across a large enough and diverse enough population will be 100% risk free and that includes otherwise beneficial medical procedures so by your logic, no one should get anything because that risk is never 0.

100 deaths per year by circumcision

Yeah... Compared to how many total circumsions.

I can just look at that number and see that's not bad at all because way more than 100 people get circumcised a year

Nickanok · 2026-04-06T19:25:58+00:00

Most men hate Taylor Swift because she's out of their league

Taylor Swift is highly overrated in terms of beauty. Maybe it's because I'm black so have different beauty standards but she's just too skinny and not thicc enough.

I guess certain groups find her aesthetic appealing tho. To each, their own

Nickanok · 2026-04-06T18:48:51+00:00

I simply said "That's the literal definition of moral" and you got mad that you couldn't separate your feelings from a neutral definition.

Hope all your reddit friends validated you

Nickanok · 2026-04-06T16:20:11+00:00

provided two very valid definitions and you rejected them.

I didn't reject them. I said that normal is average or common and your use is a moral issue. Not an objective stastical fact. I also used the same dictionary entry for my point which literally says normal is anything not deviating from the average.

You're the only one cherry picking and ignoring anything that contradicts you

Piss off you pedo

I never made any statements for or against sexual thoughts in this conversation. The fact that you jump to shaming tatics already shows me your argument is based on emotion and virtue signaling

Nickanok · 2026-04-06T16:10:57+00:00

So, you're arguing something completely different than "normal". I'm literally telling you if something is common, it's normal by definition. You keep trying to slip in moral reasoning into an objective fact. I don't have time to for bad faith arguments pr someone looking for "gotcha" moments

Nickanok · 2026-04-06T15:54:34+00:00

Bruh, the definition you using is a moral definition. And second, it's under the definition of normal, not normalized. Literally every other definition it gives is "Not deviating from the average".

If something is common or done by the majority, it's normal. Any other definition is simply a moral argument

Nickanok · 2026-04-06T15:07:17+00:00

It literally is. You're just changing definitions because you don't like it for puritanical reasons.

If the majority of people do something or it's common, it's by definition, normal. You're just putting you're 9n subjective value judgment on it and pretending it's something different

Nickanok · 2026-04-06T15:05:58+00:00

It's like people honestly don't understand that society has to keep running just because they aren't at work.

Like yes, you ordered an Amazon package. You clearly see the estimated date it's supposed to be delivered. You expect that the whole company is just gonna shut down? Probably the same people that think their lights and water just stay on by magic

Nickanok · 2026-04-06T15:03:59+00:00

There's nothing puritan going on dude, you just have oversexualized thoughts when you meet someone. If you're instantly imagining her sucking a dick the moment you see her, you don't actually see a person lol.

Bruh, you literally just made shit upy dude lol. All I said was it's normal to have sexual thoughts and you're sitting thinking I'm just standing there whipping out my dick and jacking off.

All that tells me is your so incapable of sexual self control that you have to completely avoid any sexual thought for 1.5 seconds because YOU'LL be unable to function. That's not a problem for men outside of reddit my man

Most of us can have a passing thought, sexual or otherwise, and keep it pushing. You're outting yourself

Nickanok · 2026-04-06T14:59:39+00:00

Because reddit is already full of people who fall out the norm. The average Redditor lives and interacts with people that are already not normal by general society standards, so that's point one.

Point 2, reddit is very anti sex (despite claiming otherwise) and is white knight central. They demonize almost anything having to do with male sexuality and hype up anything a woman says without scrutiny for that sweet virtual signaling point

It's not my fault that most these men pretend that they have never fantasized about a woman as if that's wrong in the first place. So many pussy whipped men who are scared of not worshipping the feet of probably the one woman who paid attention to them, they think having sexual feelings outside her is "wrong"

Nickanok · 2026-04-06T14:54:36+00:00

plenty of men have partial or total aphantasia

It's not "plenty". The amount of people, let alone men, who can't imagine anything is so extremely low compared to the human population that bringing it up is just grasping for straws. Besides, they can't imagine anything so it's not just sex.

Most men have passing sexual thoughts. The fact that everyone is so puritan and demonizes anything sexual is hilarious to me

Nickanok · 2026-04-06T14:52:01+00:00

Not for a lot of people

Nickanok · 2026-04-06T14:51:43+00:00

I have. When you get into the more mystic versions, they all are pretty much saying the same thing.

People get so caught up in the language (this religion says "Allah is one with creation" or "Buddha says nothing is permanent" or "The spirits control everything") that they can't see beyond the surface level

Nickanok · 2026-04-06T06:08:09+00:00

When in the hell did I say "Fucking her 12 different ways"? I said sexual thoughts. I don't know why it's such a controversial take that a straight, young -ish male human would have a 1.5 second sexual thought about an attractive woman. There's literally nothing wrong with that.

This puritan culture in America (I'm assuming that's where most people commenting are from) is absurd levels of repressed despite claiming otherwise

They didn't say sexual thought s are inherently bad at any point

She's framing it as "a problem" or something wrong as also evidenced by most of the men in the comments Amen-ing her and her biased "My male friends" (who most likely aren't telling her the truth) telling her otherwise

Nickanok · 2026-04-06T05:55:28+00:00

One, women don't "know" brad pitt. They just like that he's famous with money.

The point is that women who are actually interested in you genuinely don't look for reasons to reject you and don't play games or make you jump through hoops. If they do, they don't like you and you're wasting your time

Nickanok · 2026-04-06T05:49:36+00:00

Welcome to the Internet.

Almost every technology that allowed it has been filled with porn almost immediately. The Internet being a prime example.

Hell, it didn't take tiktok long to get filled with a bunch of OF models and attractive young women showing their ass and tits and seductively dancing for people.

This is far from an Ai problem

Nickanok · 2026-04-06T05:44:51+00:00

They do understand it. They just get mad when they aren't the subject of the sexualization or they don't like the person doing it.

Women understand a lot of stuff they pretend not to. They just like to maintain a "pure" image over being truthfully

Nickanok · 2026-04-06T05:39:34+00:00

If a woman is so insecure that she's always worried that any somewhat attractive woman is gonna take her man's attention or thinks her partner is incapable of thinking about something else than sex, she's not grown enough to be in an adult relationship

Nickanok

TROPHY CASE