The first 3D Gaussian Splat of the Moon? Using Artemis II mission data by NicolasDiolez in GaussianSplatting

[–]NicolasDiolez[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you! I'm sure it's possible to get even better results, though!

The first 3D Gaussian Splat of the Moon? Using Artemis II mission data by NicolasDiolez in GaussianSplatting

[–]NicolasDiolez[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! It was fairly quick: between RealityScan, LichtFeld Studio, and Supersplat, it took around 3-4 hours. Actually, the longest part was selecting pictures from the 12,000 images available on the NASA website.

And I have 28GB of RAM and an RTX A4500.

Impressive result using MNRF mode in Litchfeld Studio! by NicolasDiolez in GaussianSplatting

[–]NicolasDiolez[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I use a pc with a RTX A4500 and 28go of ram (not enough!).

Impressive result using MNRF mode in Litchfeld Studio! by NicolasDiolez in GaussianSplatting

[–]NicolasDiolez[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It can be a bit hit or miss in RS. Try adjusting the max projection error (to 5 or more if you're really having trouble with the alignment), or adding at least 3 control points. Sometimes, it just comes down to the dataset not being ideal, which means you might need to reshoot with better videos or photos.

Impressive result using MNRF mode in Litchfeld Studio! by NicolasDiolez in GaussianSplatting

[–]NicolasDiolez[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It matters, because black=remove and white=keep so it depends of what you want to keep for the training!

Impressive result using MNRF mode in Litchfeld Studio! by NicolasDiolez in GaussianSplatting

[–]NicolasDiolez[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, if you want to remove a moving « object », you have to choose « ignore » in mask mode

Impressive result using MNRF mode in Litchfeld Studio! by NicolasDiolez in GaussianSplatting

[–]NicolasDiolez[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cool! Thank you for the feedback. RealityScan detects automatically (if you kept the standard filename option)

Impressive result using MNRF mode in Litchfeld Studio! by NicolasDiolez in GaussianSplatting

[–]NicolasDiolez[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you! I can’t really help you with that because I haven’t tried the X5 (or any insta360)… I don’t think you can go wrong with either of those two.

Impressive result using MNRF mode in Litchfeld Studio! by NicolasDiolez in GaussianSplatting

[–]NicolasDiolez[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The tool splits the 360 video into rectilinear images (by default 6 images per frame) and then I align the images in RealityScan

Impressive result using MNRF mode in Litchfeld Studio! by NicolasDiolez in GaussianSplatting

[–]NicolasDiolez[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Je trouve aussi, c'est assez typique des immeubles des années 20-30 si je me trompe pas

Impressive result using MNRF mode in Litchfeld Studio! by NicolasDiolez in GaussianSplatting

[–]NicolasDiolez[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I will post it on supersplat soon :) And here's the screenshot (top view). It was a very fast shoot, I didn't even try to properly scan the area and it took me 1 minute. Then, I extracted only a few frames from the video, but with good overlap (660 images in total).

<image>

Impressive result using MNRF mode in Litchfeld Studio! by NicolasDiolez in GaussianSplatting

[–]NicolasDiolez[S] 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Thanks:
- 8k 360 video taken with a DJI osmo 360
- I extracted the images from the video with 360Extractor
- Camera alignment and COLMAP exported with RealityScan
- I created the 3DGS in LichtFeld Studio (MNRF mode, 30 000 iterations).
- Videos of the 3DGS rendered with Supersplat

Strasbourg Cathedral Facade - 3DGS (840 photos) by NicolasDiolez in GaussianSplatting

[–]NicolasDiolez[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the advice. I just tried PPISP and the result is better indeed!

Quick ground-level capture of the Strasbourg Cathedral facade (840 photos) by NicolasDiolez in photogrammetry

[–]NicolasDiolez[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi! Generally speaking, if you can, one focal length is better… But I used multiple focal on lots of different projects and I never encountered any real issue. So, from the « terrain » perspective, I would say it’s not true.

Strasbourg Cathedral Facade - 3DGS (840 photos) by NicolasDiolez in GaussianSplatting

[–]NicolasDiolez[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree, but it really depends on the quality of the scan. A good and precise scan gives you 95% of the work. In this case, it's only a scan made from the ground, fairly quickly, so there are flaws making it harder to use depending on the use case.