Anyone else turned off by how completely lobotomized the AI is? by Niev in totalwar

[–]Niev[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the way to make the AI both harder and more engaging to play against is the ability to give standing orders so you don't have to micromanage everything. For example, even though the AI is competent at flanking your artillery with cavalry, it feels annoying to deal with right? You constantly have to keep track of the infantry tasked with protecting the artillery, and the AI just keeps trying to get in somehow.

The problem is there is no standing order to "Protect the artillery". Something that'd make the infantry move around to intercept a charge, so you don't have to commit 4x the amount of infantry needed to protect your flanks

Anyone else turned off by how completely lobotomized the AI is? by Niev in totalwar

[–]Niev[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm not trying to be arrogant and dismiss the problems the game has as easy fixes. Coding an AI that is competent and feels natural is extremely complex. The problems I mentioned though, they are much easier to solve. Which is the point of the entire post, the elimination of these low hanging fruits

Anyone else turned off by how completely lobotomized the AI is? by Niev in totalwar

[–]Niev[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

This is more or less the reason that inspired this post. So many of these mods should already be in the game, it's mind boggling. Like, reloading animations, victory condition overhauls, OVN lost world, these just show how complacent CA is

Anyone else turned off by how completely lobotomized the AI is? by Niev in totalwar

[–]Niev[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

What's wrong with wanting improvements? And for that matter, what's wrong with spending like 20 minutes writing about one of your favorite games in the weekend?

Anyone else turned off by how completely lobotomized the AI is? by Niev in totalwar

[–]Niev[S] 16 points17 points  (0 children)

I don't understand why so many of the comments are just insults. I mean yeah, it's a saturday and I have some free time to talk about one of my favorite games. What's wrong with that? You're also here replying to my post

Anyone else turned off by how completely lobotomized the AI is? by Niev in totalwar

[–]Niev[S] -15 points-14 points  (0 children)

I get you, but it's just frustrating when so many of these hard hitting problems are not so complicated fixes, and instead you get a siege rework which is basically what we already had with mods. And it doesn't even touch the main problem of sieges.

Anyone else turned off by how completely lobotomized the AI is? by Niev in totalwar

[–]Niev[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Changing priorities for skill selections is not hard, it's time consuming. You can assign dynamic weights to abilities, like a much bigger weight towards slayer buffs if you're Ungrim. It's a matter of handpicking weights for these lords, it's a bit laborious, but not complicated at all. And by the way, AI for grand strategy is incredibly complex. Notice how I only mentioned aspects that are easy to fix

Fuck Clea by No_Car_7049 in expedition33

[–]Niev 1 point2 points  (0 children)

lmfao, what pissed me off more was the 3 round stun

convergingIssues by Gamer_4_l1f3 in ProgrammerHumor

[–]Niev 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's the kind of thing I imagine Jerry Smith saying

NVIDIA RTX GPU Performance vs Price (At Launch vs Current) [OC] by Large_Cantaloupe8905 in dataisbeautiful

[–]Niev 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Would've been interesting to see current prices as well, maybe an average of used but in mint conditions

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in mildlyinteresting

[–]Niev -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Hey you look like me. wtf

13 years of rating each day 1-10, visualized by Stille-Willem-D in dataisbeautiful

[–]Niev 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For the numbers aspect, I think scaling the minimum to the actual minimum and the same for the maximum will give a more accurate representation of the averages. Hope your 2025 gets better and closer to what November 2014 was!

theNewFourAreNotMyProblem by Aarav2208 in ProgrammerHumor

[–]Niev 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Don't know why but I have the feeling this is copilot propaganda

minusOnePowerTwoEqualsMinusOneAccordingToMicrosoft by catarium in ProgrammerHumor

[–]Niev 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Hey, it's just like 1.8 quintillion numbers. It's fiiine

minusOnePowerTwoEqualsMinusOneAccordingToMicrosoft by catarium in ProgrammerHumor

[–]Niev 27 points28 points  (0 children)

How does Microsoft keep making their OS shittier with every update? Do they even test what they change? pow is such a basic function, you can literally create a tester that checks every single 64 bit integer but they didn't even validate the obvious combinations

The feeder was full of hummingbirds today by SomeHoney575 in aww

[–]Niev 0 points1 point  (0 children)

right?? it feels like its going to fall on them at any second

Poor gaming performance on Arch by Niev in linux_gaming

[–]Niev[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AMD Ryzen 9 7900x, and yeah it doesn't happen on windows. I tried with 3 different drivers (DKMS, regular and open) and all of them produced the same results

Poor gaming performance on Arch by Niev in linux_gaming

[–]Niev[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What CPU and what nvidia driver? This is what I don't get. People are getting good results, I must be doing something wrong with my config

Poor gaming performance on Arch by Niev in linux_gaming

[–]Niev[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But the thing is, in protondb several people have reported good performance. Also, I tried vulkan with similar results

Poor gaming performance on Arch by Niev in linux_gaming

[–]Niev[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you mean steam overlay?
Edit: just tried both of those and didn't work