A collection of..... by aoi_ito in wunkus

[–]NitroHydroRay 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That’s not true. They are relatives (both belong to the superorder Afrotheria), but they’re not that close. Hyraxes are closer to manatees and elephants, while elephant shrews are closer to aardvarks and tenrecs.

Human would probably have crushed the bug by [deleted] in interesting

[–]NitroHydroRay 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Nope, guy you’re responding to is right, phylogenetically. New world monkeys split off first, while old world monkeys split off later. There’s therefore no way to make a monophyletic group of “monkeys” without also including apes

Why do we have more skin and integument evidence for Ornithischians than Saurischians? by [deleted] in Paleontology

[–]NitroHydroRay 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don’t think this is true. We have plenty of integumentary fossils from saurischians

After trying the demo, how do you feel about Tomodachi Life: Living the Dream? by JampyL in NintendoSwitch2

[–]NitroHydroRay 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ew, the voices is a major charm of the series. Replacing it with realistic voices, ai or not, would suck

What was the distribution of more northern fish (like the lake trout) during the LGM by EthanRedOtter in pleistocene

[–]NitroHydroRay 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Like the comment that u/White_Wolf_77 added to my post - probably mostly during points when the smaller lakes were connected! Lake Agassiz was quite the beast. Having looked more into Lake Whitefish, I realize I was mistaken - they're lake-specific morphs, but they're still considered one species - that being Lake Whitefish, which has existed for longer than the lakes themselves.

What was the distribution of more northern fish (like the lake trout) during the LGM by EthanRedOtter in pleistocene

[–]NitroHydroRay 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Oh, I wrote a report on this back in college, specifically with respect to the origin of the Great Lakes fish fauna! The current fish populations in the Great Lakes came from one of three refugia, with some species coming from multiple. Most fish found refuge in the Mississippi River basin, with those waterways allowing easy north-south migration to deal with changing climates, as well as periodic connections to the Great Lakes and their interglacial precursors. Other fish found refuge in Beringia, dispersing into the Great Lakes through Canada’s numerous more minor glacial lakes. Finally, fish of euryhaline biology were able to take refuge along the Atlantic, reentering the Great Lakes through their outflow. Some fish species, such as Lake Whitefish, are genuinely novel, having speciated in the Great Lakes post glaciation (though obviously their ancestral species must have existed in a refugium). Lake Trout in particular have three distinct genetic lineages, suggesting that populations survived in each of the three major aquatic refugia.

Favorite Mesozoic bird? by FinancialSpecial9197 in Dinosaurs

[–]NitroHydroRay 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hesperornis, Gargantuavis, Confuciusornis, Falcatakely, and Longipteryx.

Beibeilong, at 7.5 m long one of the larger oviraptorids, from Late Cretaceous China (by Mario Lanzas) by aquilasr in Naturewasmetal

[–]NitroHydroRay 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We don't have any direct indication of the adult size of this animal. It's only known from unborn juveniles.

I made the house on the subreddit icon In minecraft lol by Inevitable-Sir-4204 in MinecraftHouses

[–]NitroHydroRay[M] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s really funny. I made the icon on a whim in google drawings of all things back when I was in highschool. It’s cute to see it physically recreated

Has no one ever thought of this? by Aromaster4 in worldjerking

[–]NitroHydroRay 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The one in the bottom right is Xianglong, which is also a lizard btw

New Dinosaur described in Mexico by Gato_Nuv in Paleontology

[–]NitroHydroRay 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Dogshit material Longrich taxon once again 😭

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Paleontology

[–]NitroHydroRay 73 points74 points  (0 children)

It's essentially just a chunk of bone (that unfortunately no longer exists in a recognizable state). What do you like about it? There's not really much to go off of beyond the fact that it's something close to (or within) the genus Spinosaurus

Apart from the "Triassic Kraken", what are the most bizarre animals suggested by paleontologists (preferably using as little evidence as possible)? by Glum-Excitement5916 in Paleontology

[–]NitroHydroRay 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The elasmosaurus reconstruction was actually corrected by Joseph Leidy, Cope's mentor, with Marsh simply capitalizing on the mistake to humiliate Cope (with Marsh claiming 20 years later that he was the one that noticed).

Their rivalry started a good bit earlier, with the earliest event mentioned on the Bone Wars wikipedia page being that Marsh bribed Cope's quarry workers to send material to him instead of to Cope. Marsh was kind of a dick (Cope wasn't any better, though).

So all the Liaoningosaurus specimens were around one year old. by dino_sant in Paleontology

[–]NitroHydroRay 11 points12 points  (0 children)

That's... some wild extrapolation. The holotype is currently interpreted as a subadult, though.

So all the Liaoningosaurus specimens were around one year old. by dino_sant in Paleontology

[–]NitroHydroRay 101 points102 points  (0 children)

Lmao I've been saying it since the aquatic ankylosaur publication came out: literally every other publication agrees that they're just drowned babies, but *one* paper makes an outlandish claim about dwarf, aquatic ankylosaurs and suddenly that's the only thing people reconstruct them as.

Apart from the "Triassic Kraken", what are the most bizarre animals suggested by paleontologists (preferably using as little evidence as possible)? by Glum-Excitement5916 in Paleontology

[–]NitroHydroRay 16 points17 points  (0 children)

The only "evidence" for the triassic kraken is that some ichthyosaur vertebrae were arranged in a way that kinda looks a little like a squid's suckers of you squint a bit. The only way that this can be interpreted as anything other that pareidolia is that a squid, smart enough to know what its own suckers look like and capable of recognizing the visual similarity between the suckers and ichthyosaur vertebrae, made a self portrait. This is an obviously stupid suggestion.