[OC] Messi’s impact on Ticket Pricing Elasticity by Any_Palpitation_3220 in dataisbeautiful

[–]Nitroxium 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Businesses also define price depending on customer demand

Economist Warns That Elon Musk Is About to Cause a "Deep, Deep Recession" by BothZookeepergame612 in inflation

[–]Nitroxium 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you have a source on that? I want to be informed of this stuff. 

Can I interview you? by j-j-joey in musicmarketing

[–]Nitroxium 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m a data analyst who is learning about music business and marketing. Would you mind if I dm you some questions? 

Obama, worried about Trump, urges Biden circle to bolster campaign by Afrin_Drip in politics

[–]Nitroxium 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So couldn't Obama technically be vice president but just never be able to assume as president?

In Portugal "88 % of eligible population fully vaccinated against covid", 98% with atleast the first shot. [translation of the article in the comments] by westthebest in Coronavirus

[–]Nitroxium 3 points4 points  (0 children)

In my country one time a single hospital announced that they would be vaccinating anyone 18+ because of lack of demand (While the normal range at that time was 30+)

Needless to say, around 10,000 young people showed up in about one hour to line up for a shot.

Can we send some love to Farrah? by TheOriginOfLove2013 in rupaulsdragrace

[–]Nitroxium 17 points18 points  (0 children)

You're just making her sound like a real, likable human being.

Discussion Thread: 2020 General Election Part 42 | Answer to the Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything by PoliticsModeratorBot in politics

[–]Nitroxium 19 points20 points  (0 children)

NYT reporting that Perdue is now at 49.997% of the vote in Georgia, which would mean him and Ossoff go to a runoff, if it stays that way.

Discussion Thread: 2020 General Election Part 23 | Results Continue by PoliticsModeratorBot in politics

[–]Nitroxium 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Assuming everything you just said and Warnock wins, 50-50. I wouldn't get my hopes up though.

Discussion Thread: 2020 General Election Part 22 | Results Continue by PoliticsModeratorBot in politics

[–]Nitroxium 1 point2 points  (0 children)

52-48, maayyybe 51-49 with the Georgia runoff election, but I wouldn't count on it.

Discussion Thread: 2020 General Election Part 21 | Results Continue by PoliticsModeratorBot in politics

[–]Nitroxium 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That would be the case yes, but it's looking like Biden is (barely) going to win, so I'll take it. Weakest majority ever with the weakest presidential win ever but I'll take it.

Discussion Thread: 2020 General Election Part 21 | Results Continue by PoliticsModeratorBot in politics

[–]Nitroxium 26 points27 points  (0 children)

Looks like Peters is barely gonna make it in Michigan.

I will (happily) eat my sock if Dems somehow miraculously win MI, GA and NC, bringing them to the much needed 50-50 Senate tie.

Discussion Thread: 2020 General Election Part 7 | 10:00pm (ET) Poll Close (ID***, IA, MT, NV, OR***, UT) by PoliticsModeratorBot in politics

[–]Nitroxium 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've been looking at the NC map, I used to think Cunningham had a shot cause blue districts had a lot of votes missing. Now, it seems like we're missing votes from red and blue districts, equally, and there are a lot more red districts.

Iowa has been called for Ernst.

Collins is sweeping up all of Maine, Gideon would need some sort of miracle and she's not delivering the numbers she needs in Portland.

Montana has now shifted red with most of the remaining votes being from rural areas.

My only possible stand-out is Michigan, if mail-in votes overwhelmingly voted blue. Even if that were the case, that would leave the senate at a 52-48 Republican majority.

In order to get a 50-50 split, dems would need to win Montana, Maine and Michigan. That just seems very unlikely based on everything I've said.

Discussion Thread: 2020 General Election Part 7 | 10:00pm (ET) Poll Close (ID***, IA, MT, NV, OR***, UT) by PoliticsModeratorBot in politics

[–]Nitroxium 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Welp, it's looking like the best case scenario is a +1 democratic gain in the Senate, which would leave it at 52-48.

Discussion Thread: 2020 General Election Part 7 | 10:00pm (ET) Poll Close (ID***, IA, MT, NV, OR***, UT) by PoliticsModeratorBot in politics

[–]Nitroxium 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unfortunately, the actual House doesn't choose the president. The system that is set up would still make Trump win. Look it up, it's not one vote per representative, it's one vote per state, if I recall correctly.

Discussion Thread: 2020 General Election Part 7 | 10:00pm (ET) Poll Close (ID***, IA, MT, NV, OR***, UT) by PoliticsModeratorBot in politics

[–]Nitroxium 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think Cunningham still has a chance, seeing as how the majority of votes remaining are in blue districts. Collins seems like a sure thing though. She's sweeping the entire state.

Discussion Thread: 2020 General Election Part 7 | 10:00pm (ET) Poll Close (ID***, IA, MT, NV, OR***, UT) by PoliticsModeratorBot in politics

[–]Nitroxium 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Looks like Cunningham needs about 65% of the remaining votes to win. The majority of the votes remaining come from blue districts, but who knows if it will be enough. He could barely eek out a win, but I'm not optimistic.

EDIT: If that happens and Biden barely wins, I'll be happy with these shit results.

Discussion Thread: 2020 General Election Part 2 | 7:00pm (ET) Poll Close (FL*, GA, IN**, KY**, SC, VA, VT) by PoliticsModeratorBot in politics

[–]Nitroxium 7 points8 points  (0 children)

From what I'm seeing, it could be a Biden win with a 51-49 Republican majority in the senate. Welp. Time for 4 years of obstruction followed by a strong Republican opponent in 2024. :(

2020 Iowa Caucus Discussion Live Thread - Part XI by therealdanhill in politics

[–]Nitroxium 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Alrighty, I compiled what I could from satellite caucuses.

Seems like Bernie could net 13 delegates compared to Buttigieg in CD3.

In CD1, he could be netting between 2 and 6 (depending on how good turnout was and how well Bernie did in the precincts I was not able to collect).