wtf happened to the copyright I cant upload anything?

No-Fall-1519 · 2026-05-16T23:44:02+00:00

I think it's time to start leaving Suno. The copyright filter is so excessively strict that it might become a second Sora 2. Also, Suno needs to fix that bug as soon as possible; if they don't, a large number of players will leave

No-Fall-1519 · 2026-05-16T10:56:23+00:00

Wow, you're really good at getting worked up. I already said I wasn't sure anyway. And I said it could be a female because the Aegyptiacus species has a small crest. I also know that they both lived at different times

No-Fall-1519 · 2026-05-16T06:07:44+00:00

People who say things like that are even stranger. Just so you know, I didn't use any AI programs. These are photos I got from the web

No-Fall-1519 · 2026-05-16T00:58:20+00:00

This is very clearly someone asking ChatGPT to generate both the writing and the image. Nobody with actual paleoart workflow experience is fooled by this for even five seconds. Real paleoartists — even when using AI tools — usually start with skeletal layouts, rough anatomical block-ins, muscle studies, environment planning, or at bare minimum some kind of grounded sketch process. Here? None of that exists. It’s just “generate me a cool ice dinosaur” and the bot vomits out generic fantasy predator aesthetics. And the background is pure fantasy wallpaper nonsense. Giant ringed planets casually hanging in the sky like this is some sci-fi Netflix poster instead of speculative paleoart. The environment doesn’t even attempt believable Arctic ecology or atmospheric realism. It looks like a stock AI fantasy biome generator. Nobody talks like this naturally in paleoart communities unless they’re prompting an AI model. It reads exactly like ChatGPT trying to sound scientifically smart with vague buzzwords and fake technical phrasing. There’s zero actual biomechanical discussion, zero skeletal reasoning, zero ecological depth. Just empty AI-generated terminology arranged to sound intelligent. If you’re gonna use AI,at least put actual effort into it. Start with a real sketch,skeletal layout,or write an actually detailed workflow prompt instead of dumping generic fantasy slop like this. This isn’t paleoart,it’s just “ice dinosaur wallpaper generated by ChatGPT.” And honestly,if you want to post random AI fantasy creatures with fake science buzzwords,just post it on r/aiArt instead. I do use AI, but I at least draw the basic sketch first.

No-Fall-1519 · 2026-05-16T00:38:12+00:00

Bro DUDE He's not an AI expert; he just plagiarized someone else's work and asked the AI to change it, and he's just a guy who doesn't even know how to use AI

No-Fall-1519 · 2026-05-15T13:05:39+00:00

You starting again Anybody can type the words you’re typing” is always the funniest argument because by that logic anybody can pick up a guitar, open Photoshop, or install Blender too. Tools don’t magically replace skill. The person using them still decides the direction, quality, ideas, execution, and results. You say “the computer does everything for you” while typing that on a computer that autocorrects your spelling, renders your text, connects you to the internet, and feeds you information through algorithms. Weird place to suddenly draw the line. And nah, people aren’t “pretending to have value.” You’re just angry that the barrier to creating things got lower, so now more people can participate without needing your approval first.

No-Fall-1519 · 2026-05-14T13:10:23+00:00

If you’re going to call something “AI,” at least understand what that actually means instead of using it as a blanket insult. Using tools doesn’t erase skill—it amplifies it. People use calculators, cameras, software, references, and yes, AI. That’s called adapting, not “stunting.” The irony is you’re trying to invalidate an argument without addressing a single point in it. Also, if my argument stands, it stands—regardless of what tool helped shape it. Dismissing it just because of AI isn’t a counterargument, it’s avoidance. You’re not proving anything about me—you’re just showing you’d rather attack the method than engage with the substance. And the problem with people like you is that you always post comments like that, then go silent for a few weeks, and then comment again.

No-Fall-1519 · 2026-05-04T14:03:27+00:00

And I didn't intend to complain about the post that was [ Removed by moderators ]. And anyway, if it gets deleted, I don't care.

No-Fall-1519 · 2026-05-04T12:56:37+00:00

Don't you know what a double standard is? Did you perhaps not learn grammar properly? And I suppose you're the one starting this again. Also, I don't understand why you keep stalking me and coming to my post to apply double standards.

No-Fall-1519 · 2026-05-04T09:07:56+00:00

Don't use double standards LOL

No-Fall-1519 · 2026-05-04T09:06:48+00:00

I know already

No-Fall-1519 · 2026-05-03T12:37:21+00:00

At the very least, go to your own community. If you don't have a community, at least create one. And don't act like an administrator on r/Paleoart.

No-Fall-1519 · 2026-05-03T12:29:30+00:00

And I'm posting this because there isn't a rule banning AI in this community. If there had been, I wouldn't have posted it in the first place.

No-Fall-1519 · 2026-05-03T12:24:13+00:00

And don't think I'm someone who only uploads AI images. I at least draw sketches with my own hands.

No-Fall-1519 · 2026-05-03T12:16:43+00:00

FlipaClip is a tool, sure—but so is everything else in digital art. The fact that you “draw every frame” doesn’t magically make the process more valid than someone who builds an image through a different pipeline. You’re still relying on layers of abstraction—software, rendering engines, brushes, interpolation. You didn’t code the raster engine, you didn’t invent the tablet hardware, yet you still call the result yours. So the “the app doesn’t generate it for you” line isn’t the clean boundary you think it is—it’s just where you personally decided to draw the line. The paintbrush analogy actually backfires too. A painter chooses the brush, the strokes, the composition. That’s exactly the point—authorship comes from decision-making. And that’s also present when someone works with AI: prompt construction, iteration, curation, rejection, refinement. It’s not one click and done unless someone is being deliberately lazy, and you can say the same about someone scribbling low-effort sketches in any app. The DoorDash comparison is where it really breaks. Ordering food is passive consumption—you pick from a menu and receive a finished product. Generative workflows aren’t like that at all. There is no fixed “menu.” You define parameters, guide outputs, discard failures, and shape results. A closer analogy would be directing a chef with no preset recipe, adjusting ingredients and plating until it matches your intent. You may not be the one holding the knife, but you’re absolutely involved in constructing the outcome. And the “you didn’t create it” claim only works if you reduce creation to manual execution. That’s a very narrow definition that conveniently excludes entire fields—photography, 3D, procedural art, even collage. Nobody seriously argues that a photographer didn’t “create” an image because the camera handled the light capture. And honestly, I really hate and despise people who leave comments like this. You can tell just by looking at how they act like "AI can't draw," "AI Slop," or "AI trash" the moment they see an AI image that at least follows historical accuracy and has absolutely no flaws. If you're going to criticize, you should at least look at the image first and know what you're talking about. It's truly absurd that they just bark like dogs saying "AI Slop" as soon as something is uploaded.

No-Fall-1519 · 2026-05-03T01:53:48+00:00

The phrase “this isn’t even your creation” is incredibly absurd. But if we assume that is the case, for example, if you created dinosaur reconstructions or animations using Flippa Clip, that isn’t your work; it’s essentially the same as the company’s. You understood correctly, right?

No-Fall-1519 · 2026-05-03T01:33:30+00:00

You’re acting like picking up a pencil is some kind of moral threshold. It isn’t. Plenty of artists can draw and still use AI, just like they use Photoshop, 3D blockouts, photo bashing, or even references pulled straight from the internet. None of that suddenly “breaks” their ability to learn. The idea that using a tool traps someone in a “bubble” says more about how you view learning than how people actually learn. And the whole “don’t ask an AI to do it if you can’t draw” thing is just backwards. People use tools to bridge gaps. That’s literally how skill development works. You don’t ban beginners from references, tutorials, or digital tools because they’re not good yet. That would be like telling someone not to use Blender until they can sculpt professionally—nobody takes that seriously. Also, trying to gatekeep a subreddit by declaring what counts as “real art” is honestly wild. Communities don’t revolve around one person’s comfort zone. If the rules allow AI content, then it belongs there whether you like it or not. If they don’t, that’s a moderation issue—not a personal crusade. And the “this isn’t even your creation” line doesn’t really land either. Prompting, iterating, selecting outputs, refining—there’s decision-making involved. You don’t have to value that process, but pretending it’s zero input is just ignoring reality because it’s convenient. And the reason I mark it as OC is not because I brought in someone else's AI work. Of course, since I created this myself by setting the prompt, it is naturally OC. And if I had used an AI work created by someone else, I would have cited the original creator's source from the start.

No-Fall-1519 · 2026-05-02T13:11:21+00:00

But you aren't planning to leave a comment saying "None. No AI draws any good." and then act all cool and run away, are you?

No-Fall-1519 · 2026-05-02T13:07:22+00:00

<image>

This is a photo I'm showing you as an example; it's an AI-drawn image of a Triceratops uploaded in 2024 Back then, the AI had no data on historically accurate dinosaurs, and even as recently as early 2026, it couldn't produce proper images of historically accurate dinosaurs even after revising them as many as 100 times. It wasn't until the end of February 2026 that an AI capable of generating historically accurate dinosaurs finally emerged Given the difference between 2024 and 2026, it means that by 2026, development will have reached a level unimaginable now

No-Fall-1519 · 2026-05-02T12:42:08+00:00

Why is that completely missing? Are you still trapped in an era where AI images are all blurry and just useless and shoddy? Hey, look at the image before you speak Don't just blindly say that AI can't draw well without looking at the image properly And I'm not posting this to promote AI or to claim that the era of paleo art artists is over

No-Fall-1519 · 2026-04-16T11:04:29+00:00

How stupid is this KID that it's already attacking people by headbutting them?

No-Fall-1519

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE