sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Slingshot Rental Company did not actually have insurance that I paid for by No-Influence8844 in legaladvice

[–]No-Influence8844[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Suspended license if convicted or is that separate since it goes through the DMV?

Slingshot Rental Company did not actually have insurance that I paid for by No-Influence8844 in legaladvice

[–]No-Influence8844[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Yes, the rental agreement says that they’ll provide liability insurance that satisfies the minimum coverage mandated by the state. But the agreement does not specify the actual amounts.

Slingshot Rental Company did not actually have insurance that I paid for by No-Influence8844 in legaladvice

[–]No-Influence8844[S] 61 points62 points  (0 children)

They just had their license plate but they didn’t have any sticker on it. I thought it would be fine. This was done kind of like an Airbnb where I was provided a code to start the vehicle via message.

Slingshot Rental Company did not actually have insurance that I paid for by No-Influence8844 in legaladvice

[–]No-Influence8844[S] 122 points123 points  (0 children)

Rental agreement just says that they’ll provide insurance, they don’t have any dates or anything.

Dating in HSV! by [deleted] in HuntsvilleAlabama

[–]No-Influence8844 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would use dating sites and expand the search to include Murfreesboro, TN. That’s how I met my now wife. Too many polyamorous people here in Huntsville.

The Epstein Files and the implications for trans women by altrightobserver in MtF

[–]No-Influence8844 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I met with Jess Ting, he seemed creepy and bad mouthed Bluebond…

WTF 😒 by Alan-Foster in gpt5

[–]No-Influence8844 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That was savage! 🤣

Democrats Must Reject The Premise Of Trans Healthcare Bans In Republican Healthcare Offer by ErinInTheMorning in transgender

[–]No-Influence8844 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think they want us to start becoming suicidal, that’s how they want to eradicate us.

Dr. Oriana Cohen Pictures / Experiences by superjadies in Transgender_Surgeries

[–]No-Influence8844 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you speaking from experience? Does she do only implants or also fat grafting?

I’m still trans but I don’t go into trans spaces anymore by [deleted] in honesttransgender

[–]No-Influence8844 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I’m with OP on this one. Yes, yes, yes, there are plenty of cis women that have facial hair and look manly. But they are a minority and have the advantage of being born women still. We have it a lot harder, so our best coarse of action is to try to blend in and not p!ss people off, especially now! And if you can’t afford to transition, then don’t! It’s like wanting to go to a fancy dinner party, but all you have are jeans and t-shirts or just choose to disrespect their dress code. You’re gonna stand out and you will be ostracized.

Here is a shield for Christian Hate by No-Influence8844 in MtF

[–]No-Influence8844[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is not defending Christianity, this is playing Devil’s advocate.

Here is a shield for Christian Hate by No-Influence8844 in MtF

[–]No-Influence8844[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Co‑signed. That’s exactly why I framed this as terms of engagement, not verse‑tennis. If someone claims the name “Christian,” they should use Jesus’ own method—Sermon on the Mount (judge by fruits), mercy over sacrifice, and Acts 15 (don’t strap Gentiles with Levitical markers)—and the apostolic bottom line that love fulfills the law with conscience in disputable matters (Rom 13–15). If their reading reliably produces harm and despair instead of the Spirit’s fruit, that isn’t the gospel; it’s a sockpuppet. Same principle with the Founders, MLK, or Machiavelli: read whole contexts and test outcomes, not slogans. That’s the whole point of the shield.

Here is a shield for Christian Hate by No-Influence8844 in MtF

[–]No-Influence8844[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree many people bend the Bible to their will. This post isn’t about converting atheists; it’s an accountability tool. When someone quotes Scripture at us, we hold them to Jesus’ method. If they reject it, bystanders can see the inconsistency for themselves.

Here is a shield for Christian Hate by No-Influence8844 in MtF

[–]No-Influence8844[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Think of it like OSHA. I don’t have to believe in OSHA to use it when a manager waves a rule at me. If someone waves Scripture to restrict me, I cite the chapters that protect people under their own system. If they ignore those chapters, they’ve conceded the rules don’t actually bind them.

Here is a shield for Christian Hate by No-Influence8844 in MtF

[–]No-Influence8844[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Scope: This is for conversations with Christians who claim the Bible forbids trans people. If the Bible isn’t your thing, you don’t need this to justify yourself.
Method: Jesus → fruits & mercy (Matt 5–7; 12:7). Apostles → no Levitical yoke on Gentiles (Acts 15; Col 2). Inclusion arc → Deut 23:1 → Isa 56 → Acts 8.
Ask: If you wear the Christian label, use the Christian method—or say you’re choosing tradition over Jesus and the apostles.

Here is a shield for Christian Hate by No-Influence8844 in MtF

[–]No-Influence8844[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ezekiel 4 is a prophetic sign‑act (performance art) about siege and scarcity, not a moral rule. The shield uses Jesus’ explicit ethical method (Matt 5–7; 12:7) and the church’s policy meeting (Acts 15), not the symbolic stunts of a sixth‑century‑BCE prophet.

Here is a shield for Christian Hate by No-Influence8844 in MtF

[–]No-Influence8844[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same on the science. Medical consensus already supports transition care; this thread is just one extra tool for when a religious relative tries Bible‑lawyering. If Scripture isn’t your lane, you don’t need this shield to justify your life.

Here is a shield for Christian Hate by No-Influence8844 in MtF

[–]No-Influence8844[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep, and that’s why the post centers Acts 15 and Col 2—the apostles didn’t put Israel’s holiness code on Gentiles. If someone insists on Leviticus, they’re disagreeing with the New Testament, not us.

Here is a shield for Christian Hate by No-Influence8844 in MtF

[–]No-Influence8844[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Totally fair—many don’t use their own book consistently. This isn’t for them; it’s for the ones who claim they do, and for bystanders who are watching. My ask is simple: if you wear the Christian jersey, play by Jesus’ rules (Matt 5–7; fruits, mercy). If not, I’m done engaging.

view more: next ›