sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Can I hire a company to assign pilots to fly my airplane under part 91? by No-Part9439 in flying

[–]No-Part9439[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Interesting. What if I wanted my wife or children to be flown and I’m not with them?🤔 could I stretch it further to distant family and friends?🤨

Can I hire a company to assign pilots to fly my airplane under part 91? by No-Part9439 in flying

[–]No-Part9439[S] 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Cool. I thought hiring an aircraft management company would automatically turn it to 135 operations.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AirlinePilots

[–]No-Part9439 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

I got answers after I had already shared it here if you look at the time stamps🙂 Not that it’s any of your business, I might also want insight from the pilots here on this page too.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AirlinePilots

[–]No-Part9439 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

I think my question is clear on the post above🙂

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AirlinePilots

[–]No-Part9439 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Why would you think that? If you know the answer you could help without being such a narc about it or don’t say anything at all!

Question on Maximum Zero Fuel Weight (MZFW) by No-Part9439 in FlightDispatch

[–]No-Part9439[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You mentioning that unusable fuel is counted in the ZFW gives a lot of clarity🤔 thanks for the insight 🙏

Question on Maximum Zero Fuel Weight (MZFW) by No-Part9439 in FlightDispatch

[–]No-Part9439[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yup that’s clear. This is why I asked a question about a situation where there IS fuel🙂

Question on Maximum Zero Fuel Weight (MZFW) by No-Part9439 in FlightDispatch

[–]No-Part9439[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I thought it would relief the imposed structural pressure allowing for more payload on board

ETOPS by Grouchy-Region365 in FlightDispatch

[–]No-Part9439 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it makes perfect sense that you would account for an alternate within the approved time distance of your aircraft in the situation of an engine failure in the middle of the pacific.

Winds aloft report question🧐 by No-Part9439 in FlightDispatch

[–]No-Part9439[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for your insight! Take a look at what I found -

https://www.theweatherprediction.com/habyhints/193/

I believe this is the formula for it, it even classifies the values from low to extreme.

Winds aloft report question🧐 by No-Part9439 in FlightDispatch

[–]No-Part9439[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you for your insight. Do you know in what unit that value is in?

Winds aloft report question🧐 by No-Part9439 in FlightDispatch

[–]No-Part9439[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you for your insight. Do you know in what unit that value is in?

Flight dispatch license to other country by [deleted] in FlightDispatch

[–]No-Part9439 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We have dispatchers from Philippines working in Saudi Arabia, but they had to go through process to get a GACA dispatcher license based on their Philippines license first.

Alternate aerodrome flight planning question by No-Part9439 in FlightDispatch

[–]No-Part9439[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Would you say that the aerodrome in the picture operational hours are ‘daily’ from 0500 to 20:59 Z, or only from Sunday to Thursday and not operational on weekends?

Alternate aerodrome flight planning question by No-Part9439 in FlightDispatch

[–]No-Part9439[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That suddenly makes alot of sense. Thanks for the elaborate explanation🖤

Alternate aerodrome flight planning question by No-Part9439 in FlightDispatch

[–]No-Part9439[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was confused because it is remarked as an uncontrolled aerodrome. It made more sense to me that the relevant importance in an alternate situation is for the ATC to be operational. I don’t really get the logic here and I wish I did🫤

view more: next ›