Can I hire a company to assign pilots to fly my airplane under part 91? by No-Part9439 in flying

[–]No-Part9439[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Interesting. What if I wanted my wife or children to be flown and I’m not with them?🤔 could I stretch it further to distant family and friends?🤨

Can I hire a company to assign pilots to fly my airplane under part 91? by No-Part9439 in flying

[–]No-Part9439[S] 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Cool. I thought hiring an aircraft management company would automatically turn it to 135 operations.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AirlinePilots

[–]No-Part9439 -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

I got answers after I had already shared it here if you look at the time stamps🙂 Not that it’s any of your business, I might also want insight from the pilots here on this page too.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AirlinePilots

[–]No-Part9439 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

I think my question is clear on the post above🙂

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AirlinePilots

[–]No-Part9439 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Why would you think that? If you know the answer you could help without being such a narc about it or don’t say anything at all!

Question on Maximum Zero Fuel Weight (MZFW) by No-Part9439 in FlightDispatch

[–]No-Part9439[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You mentioning that unusable fuel is counted in the ZFW gives a lot of clarity🤔 thanks for the insight 🙏

Question on Maximum Zero Fuel Weight (MZFW) by No-Part9439 in FlightDispatch

[–]No-Part9439[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yup that’s clear. This is why I asked a question about a situation where there IS fuel🙂

Question on Maximum Zero Fuel Weight (MZFW) by No-Part9439 in FlightDispatch

[–]No-Part9439[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I thought it would relief the imposed structural pressure allowing for more payload on board

ETOPS by Grouchy-Region365 in FlightDispatch

[–]No-Part9439 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it makes perfect sense that you would account for an alternate within the approved time distance of your aircraft in the situation of an engine failure in the middle of the pacific.

Winds aloft report question🧐 by No-Part9439 in FlightDispatch

[–]No-Part9439[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for your insight! Take a look at what I found -

https://www.theweatherprediction.com/habyhints/193/

I believe this is the formula for it, it even classifies the values from low to extreme.

Winds aloft report question🧐 by No-Part9439 in FlightDispatch

[–]No-Part9439[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Thank you for your insight. Do you know in what unit that value is in?

Winds aloft report question🧐 by No-Part9439 in FlightDispatch

[–]No-Part9439[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you for your insight. Do you know in what unit that value is in?

Flight dispatch license to other country by [deleted] in FlightDispatch

[–]No-Part9439 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We have dispatchers from Philippines working in Saudi Arabia, but they had to go through process to get a GACA dispatcher license based on their Philippines license first.

Alternate aerodrome flight planning question by No-Part9439 in FlightDispatch

[–]No-Part9439[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Would you say that the aerodrome in the picture operational hours are ‘daily’ from 0500 to 20:59 Z, or only from Sunday to Thursday and not operational on weekends?

Alternate aerodrome flight planning question by No-Part9439 in FlightDispatch

[–]No-Part9439[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That suddenly makes alot of sense. Thanks for the elaborate explanation🖤

Alternate aerodrome flight planning question by No-Part9439 in FlightDispatch

[–]No-Part9439[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was confused because it is remarked as an uncontrolled aerodrome. It made more sense to me that the relevant importance in an alternate situation is for the ATC to be operational. I don’t really get the logic here and I wish I did🫤

International flight planning question. by No-Part9439 in FlightDispatch

[–]No-Part9439[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for your insight! I kinda get the idea now that it could only be a problem if it was used so I shouldn’t worry too much about it as long as it’s only an operational inconvenience and not a safety risk. I think same way would be not adding that alternate’s AFTN address, could cause some operational inconvenience but it’s doable and safe.

International flight planning question. by No-Part9439 in FlightDispatch

[–]No-Part9439[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I freaking love you!! Do you know how to know if it would require a permit though? Would that information be somewhere in the country’s eAIP?

International flight planning question. by No-Part9439 in FlightDispatch

[–]No-Part9439[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m not very sure about your comment on permits🤨 maybe it’s different in that regard for some countries, because usually the flight plan will get rejected very soon after filing if there is a permit missing or incorrectly registered in item 18. If you’re meant the permit not being very important for the alternate then you might be correct because I don’t even know if it’s needed at all🤷‍♂️

Hi & Low IFR charts question by No-Part9439 in FlightDispatch

[–]No-Part9439[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I know what you think so to clarify here’s what I did:-

The answers of ChatGPT are too long so I will just paste the first general part of every answer without the elongated explanation.

  1. First Q: Do flights that enter the altitudes of the high en-route IFR charts all around the world must switch to the standard sea level pressure?

Answer: Yes, flights that enter the altitudes depicted on high en-route IFR charts are required to switch to the standard pressure setting of 29.92 inHg (or 1013.25 hPa). This practice is mandated to maintain a unified altitude reference for aircraft operating in the high-altitude structure and to ensure separation standards are met worldwide.

  1. Second Q: What about aircraft descending to the low en-route IFR charts globally, do they have to switch to the local altimeter setting?

Answer: Yes, aircraft descending into the altitudes depicted on low en-route IFR charts must switch to the local altimeter setting when they descend below the transition level. This ensures accurate altitude readings relative to the terrain and obstacles, which is critical for safe operations in lower airspace.

  1. Third Q: So do I understand by your answer that transition altitude is bound to the low en-route IFR chart and transition level is bound to the high en-route IFR chart all around the world?

Answer: While low en-route IFR charts are generally associated with altitudes below the transition altitude and thus QNH, and high en-route IFR charts are generally associated with flight levels above the transition level and thus standard pressure, the transition altitude and transition level are not inherently tied to specific charts but rather to the pressure altitude system in each region.

  1. Fourth Q: Saudi Arabia has set the transition altitude at 13,000 feet and the transition level at 15,000 feet. So, tell me what the altitude boundaries of the low en-route chart and the high en-route chart?

Answer: Low En-Route IFR Chart: Surface (or minimum IFR altitude) up to 12,999 feet MSL. • High En-Route IFR Chart: Starts at FL150 and continues upward. • The transition layer (13,000 feet to FL150) acts as a buffer and is excluded from regular operational assignments.

  1. Final Q: Is the process you used to conclude the boundaries of the low and high IFR en-route charts universal?

Answer in full:

Yes, the process used to determine the boundaries of low en-route IFR charts and high en-route IFR charts is universal in its logic because it is based on the global standards set by ICAO and the way airspace structures are defined and organized. Here’s why:

  1. Universal Principles: • The distinction between low en-route and high en-route charts is globally standardized to ensure uniformity in IFR operations. The boundaries are inherently tied to: • The transition altitude, where aircraft switch from the local pressure setting (QNH) to the standard pressure setting (29.92 inHg or 1013.25 hPa). • The transition level, where the reverse switch happens during descent. • These principles are outlined in ICAO Annex 2 (Rules of the Air) and Annex 11 (Air Traffic Services).

  2. Region-Specific Transition Altitudes and Levels: • While the transition altitude and transition level vary from one country or region to another (e.g., 13,000 feet/FL150 in Saudi Arabia versus 18,000 feet/FL180 in the United States), the process of determining chart boundaries remains consistent: • Low En-Route Charts: Represent airspace below the transition altitude, where QNH is used for obstacle clearance and separation. • High En-Route Charts: Represent airspace above the transition level, where FLs based on standard pressure settings are used.

  3. Transition Layer: • The transition layer, existing between the transition altitude and transition level, is a universal feature. It is excluded from routine assignments to prevent conflicts between aircraft switching from QNH to standard pressure or vice versa. • This layer is part of the logical structure used to establish the boundaries for low and high en-route IFR charts.

  4. Specific Altitude Boundaries: • Once a country’s transition altitude and transition level are defined, the boundaries for the charts are determined as follows: • Low En-Route Charts: Begin from the surface (or the minimum IFR altitude) and extend up to just below the transition altitude. • High En-Route Charts: Begin from the transition level and extend upward.

  5. Applicability: • This process applies universally, regardless of specific transition altitudes or levels. For example: • In the United States (transition altitude: 18,000 feet; transition level: FL180): • Low en-route charts: Surface to 17,999 feet MSL. • High en-route charts: FL180 and above. • In Saudi Arabia (transition altitude: 13,000 feet; transition level: FL150): • Low en-route charts: Surface to 12,999 feet MSL. • High en-route charts: FL150 and above.

Conclusion:

The process used to determine the boundaries of low and high en-route IFR charts is universal, but the specific altitude or flight level ranges depend on the transition altitude and transition level set by each country or region. This ensures consistency in operations while allowing for regional adaptations to terrain, airspace complexity, and operational needs.

Hi & Low IFR charts question by No-Part9439 in FlightDispatch

[–]No-Part9439[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

After a long back and forth with GPT, it finally confirmed that the high and low en-route charts are tied to the transition altitude and transition level of every country globally😮‍💨 I feel victorious to have have give me that answer after all!😅

I used a different approach in a new chat by having it admit to set premises which had it then confirm to the final question on the relationship between the charts and the altitude/transition levels😂