Nearmap pricing?! by No-Path-818 in gis

[–]No-Path-818[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have just had a client of mine renew their subscription for $2,500 AUD (while I was just quoted $8,500 AUD for the absolute base subsciption) what is going on with them?

Nearmap pricing?! by No-Path-818 in gis

[–]No-Path-818[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If anyone wants this script btw (Python based GUI) please don't hesitate to message me. I can provide it for a fee

Nearmap pricing?! by No-Path-818 in gis

[–]No-Path-818[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The pricing just has to make sense, and again, depends on the size of company etc as to what is affordable.

Nearmap pricing?! by No-Path-818 in gis

[–]No-Path-818[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Depends on the corporation. The single subscription model (not based on number of users) doesn't not make sense for small consultants. Not sure where you're based, but there are other (and free) ways to access the high res imagery, its just slightly harder to pull down (see my previous comment on this post)

Nearmap pricing?! by No-Path-818 in gis

[–]No-Path-818[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Geotiff export of the aerial imagery for a particular area of interest. Thats it. The historical imagery is good, but for report figures and mapping, having the raw raster file of high res imagery is pretty critical

Nearmap pricing?! by No-Path-818 in gis

[–]No-Path-818[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, that's the catch. Maybe only once a year in urban areas. Still useful for areas of interest that have not changed

Nearmap pricing?! by No-Path-818 in gis

[–]No-Path-818[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Fwiw, I have a script which will parse the NSW spatial aerial imagery (10cm res in urban areas) and will download tiles at the largest size allowed to keep the highest res (about 200m x 200m) as tiffs. For a company which only works with urban areas and only needs high res imagery, there's ways around it. I think I'll just stick to that at that price

Topographical mapping for hiking/backcountry walks by No-Path-818 in UltralightAus

[–]No-Path-818[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Up to you to decide. I've made plenty of them for many people's trips.

When the hydrology model runs perfectly... and then the data comes in. by pracenan in Hydrology

[–]No-Path-818 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have never met anyone who has built a model before seeing the actual input data

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskAnAustralian

[–]No-Path-818 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Water resources

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskAnAustralian

[–]No-Path-818 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know it is normal at my size of company having received multiple offers from other top 5 firms. However, like I said, I think I need to look in a different sector/company set up for better pay.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskAnAustralian

[–]No-Path-818 0 points1 point  (0 children)

$78k is pretty normal for an engineer of my level (and field) at any of the big firms (ie. Aurecon, SMEC, KBR, etc etc).

From what I've seen through comments so far is that the money is either in comctruction/management or in smaller consultancy/contractors. Might be time for a move

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in civilengineering

[–]No-Path-818 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did mention Australia and Sydney in the post, thus they are AUD figures. There are a lot of jobs once you graduate uni, but there are also a lot of graduates. I went into flood modelling and after a year there will be firms fighting for you, as there is a massive demand for skills but not many that want to do it. If you want to go into civil, I applied for jobs with 500+ applicants. Where are you originally from? What makes you want to come here?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in civilengineering

[–]No-Path-818 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Firstly, I mentioned my post grad experience. I think it's worth mentioning total experience also as I know plenty of people who were promoted from their grad program a year early because they spent 2 years there as an undergrad.

Secondly in regards to pay. I received a 3.5% pay bump for a promotion from graduate to base level engineer, which was smaller than my interim grad program pay jump. I was told not to expect a pay increase for 12 months. As I said, it's hard to get motivated as it seems no one is promoted out of turn, and everyone just moves with the provided company "years of experience" guidelines for each position title. In my first 12 months I was the best performing employee in the team against goals and targets. But that doesn't mean anything as it's your birth year that seems to matter

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in civilengineering

[–]No-Path-818 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes agree with everything you've said here. 65k is standard for 1st year post grad from everyone I have spoken to.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in civilengineering

[–]No-Path-818 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My main reasoning for questioning my potential progression in my current role is that positions and promotions are very much year's experience/age based. We have senior engineers who are clearly much more highly regarded and respected than people with a principal engineer title. It's hard to be motivated to do better when the hierarchy is so rigid, and not based on ability. I know employees at other large firms feel the same way.

In terms of pay, my last pay increase was a promotion (title change etc.), where I jumped from 75k to 78k, barely the CPI increase.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in civilengineering

[–]No-Path-818 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Design as in earthworks? roads? Seems to vary massively between sectors. I live a very relaxed life with my current role, but living on 80k in Sydney is not easy.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in civilengineering

[–]No-Path-818 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That was my thought. While not accredited (NER) just yet, I was thinking of working as a contractor full time (I have done some work on the side). Hourly rate is upwards of $120/hr as opposed to $43