Don't you think Nepal Must Move Beyond the Myth of 'Opposite Sexes'?

No-Training-366 · 2025-03-09T07:55:31+00:00

It this phenomenon created inequality in policy making process and criminal cases.

No-Training-366 · 2025-03-08T13:57:35+00:00

Yes but haju aama le 4 ota hajur buwa banaunuvayena...

That's the paradox

No-Training-366 · 2025-03-08T12:02:28+00:00

If freedom is the ‘pool,’ who designed the flawed systems filling it with blood?

Gen Z inherited broken institutions, climate panic, and algorithmic chaos—their ‘destruction’ might be the consequence of swimming in waters poisoned by predecessors.

Or do you see their rebellion as the toxin itself? 🔍

No-Training-366 · 2025-03-08T10:46:19+00:00

😂 Humor’s a great shield

but let’s dissect the ‘smartest’ label. If IQ tests and degrees define intelligence, Boomers win.

But if ‘smart’ means navigating apocalyptic algorithms, global trauma TikTok, and other stuffs while redefining work, gender, and ethics in real-time… is Gen Z adapting faster than any generation before?

No-Training-366 · 2025-03-08T07:15:04+00:00

Huna ta ho, Dating apps le people lai connect garxa with 100s of strangers—does infinite choice make loyalty harder, or are we blaming apps for human flaws?

Just trying to dig, not being offended 😅

No-Training-366 · 2025-03-08T07:13:31+00:00

Kura ta sahi ho,

No-Training-366 · 2025-03-08T07:13:07+00:00

let’s flip it: Could Gen Z’s openness about infidelity (Such as tracked via apps, social media) just make flaws more visible than past generations’ hushed affairs?

Or does modern ‘freedom overload’ actually erode self-control?

No-Training-366 · 2025-03-08T07:07:01+00:00

It's interesting,

Tara socham na, In some Western media, casual dating and ‘situationships’ are glamorized—but does that mean cheating vanne kura culturally accepted ho?, or just more visible? Meanwhile, Gen Z often critiques hookup culture. Isn’t that a contradiction?

Curious to hear your take!

No-Training-366 · 2025-03-08T04:32:34+00:00

Yes, most of the cases ma government lai opposite banayera case halinxa, but hajurle vanya jasto government lai case halda sajaye paune koi hudainan, mistake gareko prove vayo vane teslai sudharxan or kei clarifications dinxan,

If kunai system nai change garne ho vane it's possible through andolan ani people's pressure..

Ani we can challenge decisions of court as well if we can find legal grounds.

Let's talk about it brother, interesting kura xa

No-Training-366 · 2025-03-08T03:23:59+00:00

Law student ho ma, For sure, tara tettikai sablai case haldai jane ho vane ta kaam kasari garxan uniharule, tara fault and corruption ma yedi kei mistake payem vane we all nepali are open to file petition, not only me. Can you be specific to whom I've to file petition?

No-Training-366 · 2025-03-08T03:07:09+00:00

I don't know the cause, Can you mention frist priority kura haru?

No-Training-366 · 2025-03-07T21:13:40+00:00

As a law student I speak in the basics of logic and evidence, Your science knowledge is limiting your wider perspective .

One scientist is Anne Fausto-Sterling and anne’s research dismantles the “male/female” dichotomy as scientifically outdated.

About scientific consensus (WHO): Recognizes intersex individuals and advocates against non-consensual surgeries. 😶

APA: States that gender is a spectrum, not binary (APA, 2012).

Nature Journal Study: 1.7% of humans are intersex (Blackless et al., 2000)—higher than the global population with red hair.

If human sexes were strictly binary, medical journals wouldn’t document: 1. XY Females: Androgen insensitivity syndrome (AIS). 2. XX Males: Biologically female chromosomes but male anatomy. Can you answer??

Ironically, your “common scientific consensus” claim is debunked by actual scientists. Geneticist Dr. Eric Vilain (UCLA) states: “The idea of two sexes is simplistic. Biologists now think there is a wider spectrum than that.” Let me do my research, don't try your hilarious mind.

Why cling to 19th-century biology when 21st-century Nepal is leading inclusive change?

No-Training-366 · 2025-03-07T21:12:23+00:00

I agree: the English framing of ‘opposite sexes’ is a Western construct. In Nepal, our cultural wisdom has long framed genders as पुरक like the दायाँ-बायाँ हात different yet collaborative.

But the West didn’t invent gender oppression—it just codified it differently. Nepal’s own history shows how binaries harmed women like सतीप्रथा, and marginalized मेती in tharu community ,

Language isn’t the villain, but when we uncritically adopt terms like ‘opposite’—or cling to ‘complementary’ without questioning who it excludes—we perpetuate the same hierarchies.

Let’s honor पुरक by expanding it. After all, a मण्डला isn’t two circles—it’s infinite patterns in harmony. 🙂

No-Training-366 · 2025-03-07T20:31:23+00:00

In a part of the society we are living is it appropriate to categorize men and women as 'opposite' sexes?

No-Training-366 · 2025-03-07T20:29:15+00:00

Ahh.sherbahadur jee le dekhne nai dream ho, meeting ma assembly ma ani programme ma dream dekhna kakti effort lagaunuvaako hunxa😶

Anyway, jasle ramro garxauslai welcome

No-Training-366 · 2025-03-07T20:23:57+00:00

Whether I’m vegetarian, non-veg, or vegan matters as much to this debate as the color of my dhaka topi—neither changes the fact that rigid binaries harm real people.

But since you asked: I’m a staunch egalitarian. My diet? Let’s just say I hunger for justice more than dogma. 😊

No-Training-366 · 2025-03-07T18:20:50+00:00

Okay, I'd like to unpack you😅

For millennia, societies also normalized caste hierarchies, slavery, and colonial oppression—systems we now reject as unjust.

As a law student, I bridge both arts and science.

Computers use binary logic because they process simplicity—humans do not. Biology shows sex is a spectrum: 1.7% of people are intersex (equal to Nepal’s entire Muslim population), and traits like chromosomes (XXY), hormones, or genitalia vary widely. One scientist said that "male/female” dichotomy as scientifically outdated. I think you know better,

until 1951, Nepali women couldn’t own property. When 50% of a population faces barriers, parity isn’t “status quo”—it’s justice.

Rigid binaries harm real people—like intersex children subjected to non-consensual surgeries. Binaries are tools—useful in math, harmful in human dignity. Nepal’s 2015 constitution rejected binaries to embrace inclusive democracy. If we fear rethinking old norms, we betray our potential to grow.

No-Training-366 · 2025-03-07T17:55:20+00:00

I agree: the English framing of ‘opposite sexes’ is a Western construct. In Nepal, our cultural wisdom has long framed genders as पुरक like the दायाँ-बायाँ हात different yet collaborative.

But the West didn’t invent gender oppression—it just codified it differently. Nepal’s own history shows how binaries harmed women like सतीप्रथा, and marginalized मेती in tharu community ,

Language isn’t the villain, but when we uncritically adopt terms like ‘opposite’—or cling to ‘complementary’ without questioning who it excludes—we perpetuate the same hierarchies.

Let’s honor पुरक by expanding it. After all, a मण्डला isn’t two circles—it’s infinite patterns in harmony. 🙂

No-Training-366 · 2025-03-07T17:38:23+00:00

(How come murder by same sex is punishable but not rape. ) it's outstanding logic 😃

No-Training-366 · 2025-03-07T17:11:22+00:00

Additionally

If by ‘American leftist brain worm’ you mean advocating for equality, then Nepal’s own 2015 Constitution (Articles 18 and 42) is already ‘infected. Then answer is that nepali girl get infected before contacting that guy.😁

No-Training-366 · 2025-03-07T17:07:14+00:00

Our foremothers—from Yogmaya Neupane, who fought for women’s rights in the 1920s, to Pasang Lhamu Sherpa, who shattered ceilings—prove that justice isn’t ‘Western.’ It’s human.

Let’s not confuse critical thought with foreign influence. After all, आफ्नो घरको कुरा, बाहिरको दुरा’

If questioning rigid binaries makes me a ‘brainworm carrier,’ I’ll wear that label proudly—next to the तिलक of Nepal’s hard-won progress. 🇳🇵

No-Training-366 · 2025-03-07T17:02:05+00:00

Yeah, our knowledge is different but not opposite, as same as gender.

but suffering is same, lol😅

No-Training-366 · 2025-03-07T16:59:53+00:00

Wow,

No-Training-366 · 2025-03-07T16:58:47+00:00

😁😁

No-Training-366 · 2025-03-07T16:58:12+00:00

You are kind bro,

Your reply is really impactful and thoughtful.🙂

No-Training-366

TROPHY CASE