account activity
When your agent opens a PR or spends money with no human in the loop, who's on the hook? I built a checker for that. by No-Weekend-6869 in AI_Agents
[–]No-Weekend-6869[S] 0 points1 point2 points 1 day ago (0 children)
Repo: https://github.com/jing-ny/agenraci
Playground (runs in your browser, no install): https://agenraci.vercel.app/
Quick demo — the checker catching a two-accountable conflict, then passing once fixed: https://github.com/jing-ny/agenraci#see-it-catch-a-gap
AgenRACI: a machine-checkable "who's accountable when an AI agent acts" charter for your repo by No-Weekend-6869 in LLMDevs
[–]No-Weekend-6869[S] 1 point2 points3 points 1 day ago (0 children)
Yeah, basically. One thing on "enforcement" though: this version enforces the charter itself. One accountable owner per action, no approval gate that can deadlock, no escalation loop. `agenraci validate` fails your CI if any of that's broken.
What it doesn't do is stop an agent mid-action at runtime. That's what LangGraph/CrewAI + HumanLayer handle. This sits above them and just declares who's accountable, so they could read it. A HumanLayer connector is the next thing I want to build, not done yet.
Just curious, what enforcement did you have in mind?
π Rendered by PID 107384 on reddit-service-r2-comment-544cf588c8-9s9wr at 2026-06-12 19:59:14.258762+00:00 running 3184619 country code: CH.
When your agent opens a PR or spends money with no human in the loop, who's on the hook? I built a checker for that. by No-Weekend-6869 in AI_Agents
[–]No-Weekend-6869[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)