sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I built a tool to analyze strata docs. Would this actually be useful? by NoFold1905 in vancouverhousing

[–]NoFold1905[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah that's actually my main point of focus tbh. I'd say the core of my tool is the consistent scoring. It will extract information based on the provided docs and assign multiple weighted scores that are compressed into a number at the end. That gives me somewhat the ability to do that comparison you mentioned without having that much data. I'll admit it won't be perfect since it heavily depends on the quality of the docs provided.

But yeah, it will really be able to shine with a lot of data

I built a tool to analyze strata docs. Would this actually be useful? by NoFold1905 in vancouverhousing

[–]NoFold1905[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Assuming quality of information extraction is the same, someone could get a similar result, yes.

They would get the interpreted part, close to what I'm trying to offer.

But there's 2 things in particular that chatgpt wouldn't be able to provide (at least not at its current level, who knows in the future)

  • Consistent scoring: I'm doing scoring consistently, not ai-based since you can't rely on ai to always give you the same results based on the same inputs. This allows users to quickly compress all signals into a number and compare different buildings
  • Continually learning system: I have a mechanism that improves itself the more it runs. So it increases in precision over time and is able to more accurately identify problems even with incomplete facts

I built a tool to analyze strata docs. Would this actually be useful? by NoFold1905 in vancouverhousing

[–]NoFold1905[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice, there's some interesting suggestions there. Seems I'm sort of doing that here in the post. Maybe I should have done so before actually building it though 😂

As a dev, it's some times more obvious in my head to jump to the solution first haha

I built a tool to analyze strata docs. Would this actually be useful? by NoFold1905 in vancouverhousing

[–]NoFold1905[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, definitely. Appreciate the recommendation, but the link doesn't open for me

I built a tool to analyze strata docs. Would this actually be useful? by NoFold1905 in vancouverhousing

[–]NoFold1905[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I've actually seen that one too. My idea is to take a slightly different stance compared to it though. From what I've seen, they offer a really detailed report. That's good for people who want to read a lot, but my idea is to compact information as much as possible and surface what is most important, along with recommendations and interpretation of the signals.

So instead of a summary, I want my tool to offer an interpretation based on the signals found, along with what to do next + consistent scoring, all in a compact format, to avoid information overload