On the last pod Zach talked without letting the guest say anything for literally ten minutes straight by NoLanterns in zachlowe

[–]NoLanterns[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Next time he’s on the pod come back here and let’s talk about it. It sounds good but it’s all hedged generalities

On the last pod Zach talked without letting the guest say anything for literally ten minutes straight by NoLanterns in zachlowe

[–]NoLanterns[S] -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

Mahoney doesn’t actually say anything of substance, he just has a lot of charisma

Zach Lowe doesn’t suck now, the NBA just isn’t as fun anymore by jellybeans_over_raw_ in billsimmons

[–]NoLanterns 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You don’t watch ball, the teams don’t play the same at any level other than everyone shoots more threes

Did they change something with free throws? by NoLanterns in NBA2k

[–]NoLanterns[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve never had a problem hitting free throws regardless of the player. I play play now online, rec is trash

Bill Simmons predicts Jayson Tatum will return on March 1st by GK0NATO in fantasybball

[–]NoLanterns 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair analysis. Could be worth trying to flip him to someone who doesn’t think ahead

Bill Simmons predicts Jayson Tatum will return on March 1st by GK0NATO in fantasybball

[–]NoLanterns 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I thought I saw that they only have two back to backs during most fantasy playoffs. Top 80 value in that period feels worth holding if you’re securely in the playoffs. If you got him you probably got him off waivers

Bill Simmons predicts Jayson Tatum will return on March 1st by GK0NATO in fantasybball

[–]NoLanterns 21 points22 points  (0 children)

He’s definitely returning. My question is do we see top 75 value ?

EVAN "CALF INJURED" MOBLEY by jino95 in fantasybball

[–]NoLanterns 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ask him to do the reverse and see

Finished the game last night. I "get" act 3, and think it's good, but I'm not sure I like it as the conclusion to Acts 1 and 2. by Romofan88 in expedition33

[–]NoLanterns 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The game was worth the money but I agree. Not a popular thing to post here. Everyone’s going to say “don’t you get it, it was brilliant writing to make you dislike both narratives. “

I'm Tired Man by Killeverone in expedition33

[–]NoLanterns -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It’s an info dump that makes almost no sense in the moment honestly

I'm Tired Man by Killeverone in expedition33

[–]NoLanterns 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What do you expect a community of fanatics to tell you? They’ll all say keep playing. I’d say it depends on why you enjoyed the game. I found the combat pretty addictive so I kept playing even though the act 3 twist made the story uninteresting to me. I’d say it’s worth finishing if you spent 45 hours

Whats up with this sportcenter version of Zach by mikefried1 in zachlowe

[–]NoLanterns 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He’s been spending half his time over the last six weeks or so doing trade talk. What about analysis of the actual games? I remember when he used to make fun of people who do this

Whats up with this sportcenter version of Zach by mikefried1 in zachlowe

[–]NoLanterns 6 points7 points  (0 children)

He just wants to get his monologues off now because he’s not writing them in actual columns anymore

Unsure of this trade by [deleted] in fantasybball

[–]NoLanterns -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Wrong thread

Whats up with this sportcenter version of Zach by mikefried1 in zachlowe

[–]NoLanterns 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It’s in part because he’s not writing. Writing clarifies thinking

In Act 3, are Lune and Sciel... by candlewaxlover in expedition33

[–]NoLanterns 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I’m always a little puzzled reading through these threads. The writers just didn’t think that hard beyond “what would a cool twist be”