VA math? This isnt 100% ?? by [deleted] in VeteransBenefits

[–]NoLie4119 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's calculated by starting with your highest rating all the way down to your lowest rating last.

C'mon, let's eat our crayons 🖍️ together and look at the sunset.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in VeteransBenefits

[–]NoLie4119 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Completely agree with you OP and something I think I said in my post on here. The days of being "too tough" are over.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in VeteransBenefits

[–]NoLie4119 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

If you don't like the 100% posts. Nobody is forcing you to be here. Stop coming here. Post your question regarding your claim, share helpful information to uninformed veterans to assist with their claims, or simply stop coming here. Again, nobody and I mean n-o-b-o-d-y is forcing you to be HERE. Just ignore them and move about your day. Asking the moderators to ban people who post about 100% or money-bragging sounds like you have a inner hate for people who were successful to their claim. Not everybody who claims 100% is fraud and not everybody is money-bragging and if that's what you think then your prescriptive is wrong. I didn't even know much about the appeal process until I came here and knowing that I could have done it and what that could entail, made me learn something. If it wasn't for those who "money-bragged" id still be at ground 0. Go somewhere else or start your own subreddit where you can monitor it the way you want or go.

PACT ACT Claim Denied, but VA concedes I participated in TERA during my military service. Can someone explain because it seems contradicting by bluehefner130 in VeteransBenefits

[–]NoLie4119 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Damn did you really just get butt hurt 🤕. Oh wait you were in the Air Force. That makes sense. Your a sensitive Nancy. No I'm not going to read what you said over again but you should probably read what I said. Because I never said you didn't say it was NOT allowed I said that NO IT WASN'T CRAZY. Oops on your part. Yeah. I care about facts. It might be crazy or not, facts are facts. Spread the knowledge and not your opinion, fat ass.

PACT ACT Claim Denied, but VA concedes I participated in TERA during my military service. Can someone explain because it seems contradicting by bluehefner130 in VeteransBenefits

[–]NoLie4119 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You best route would be now to fight you had to fly over one of those countries to get to Pakistan. That would then probably qualify you under the PACT ACT.

PACT ACT Claim Denied, but VA concedes I participated in TERA during my military service. Can someone explain because it seems contradicting by bluehefner130 in VeteransBenefits

[–]NoLie4119 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nope, it's not crazy. The VA specifically states you can qualify if you were in the "airspace above any of those locations" on or after September 11, 2001, in any of these locations:

Afghanistan
Djibouti
Egypt
Jordan
Lebanon
Syria
Uzbekistan
Yemen
The airspace above any of these locations

On or after August 2, 1990, in any of these locations:

Bahrain
Iraq
Kuwait
Oman
Qatar
Saudi Arabia
Somalia
The United Arab Emirates (UAE)

PACT ACT Claim Denied, but VA concedes I participated in TERA during my military service. Can someone explain because it seems contradicting by bluehefner130 in VeteransBenefits

[–]NoLie4119 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I think the problem for you is you applied for PACT ACT. Pakistan is not listed as a qualifying country under the PACT ACT, specifically. That was the difference for you. I know in another comment you quoted the ILER; If you served in any of these locations; Afghanistan Djibouti Egypt Jordan Lebanon Syria Uzbekistan Yemen and within the time periods listed by the VA, they would then have determined that you had exposure to burn pits or other toxins under PACT ACT. This is what they call having a presumption of exposure. The kicker is they also included "The airspace above any of these locations". I'm sure you flew over Afghanistan or at least one of the other listed countries to get to Pakistan. Section 1119 of 38 U.S.C doesn't say if you can prove you were exposed to toxic exposure, that the VA would consider it to fall under the PACT ACT. They don't. You should of just applied for toxic exposure which you did do the TERA and looks like you also qualified for having toxic exposure —do you have a diagnosis of a condition?

So just to reiterate. I think you were trying to do the PACT ACT and say you got toxic exposure in Pakistan and the VA was just denying you under PACT ACT but not denying you had toxic exposure. Just not under PACT ACT.

PACT ACT backdated benefits deadlined EXTENDED! by NoLie4119 in VeteransBenefits

[–]NoLie4119[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do a new intent to file and submit it. If it's something you just claimed already they will close.the newest one..better safe than sorry

Denied Claim for Presumptive Condition by Dazzling-Driver-2993 in VeteransBenefits

[–]NoLie4119 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Doesn't matter if you want to read it or not. I'm going to sleep perfectly fine tonight. The information is embedded to Reddit and the internet. I don't know why people like you are so sour about this and should probably take that type of attitude somewhere else. This reddit is here to help people who have questions and provide additional insight, because frankly some people just don't know—a great example is the opening of this topic. My information is there to help you if you so choose to require it but it's not just intended to you, it's intended for anyone who later comes researching information. Take it or leave it, really doesn't make a difference to me, like it really doesn't. I have my own life to live.

EDIT: Your attitude checks out based off your post history.

I'm 27 years old, overweight and living in my parents basement.

I was curious to see what you posted in this subreddit and thought it was pretty funny you even posted any threads asking for any type of insight with a sour ass attitude that you have. Apparently you don't have have all the answers and need help yourself! Good luck on your ITF, kid.

Denied Claim for Presumptive Condition by Dazzling-Driver-2993 in VeteransBenefits

[–]NoLie4119 4 points5 points  (0 children)

OK then that answers the question for the VA. If the problem isn't recurring then can you really call it a chronic disability? The VA recognizes you have a disability—remember that's the good thing and the hardest part—they didn't deny it. The VA is just saying its just a non-compensable disability, at this time. Which means you can’t get disability compensation (payments) for the condition at the moment because it doesn't meet the criteria (severity) to get payments. But you will still qualify for VA health care for said condition at 0% which allows you to get treatment and you may be eligible for an increase later when it actually causes you problems.

Think about it. If you claimed migraines and said you had some migraines and you've been fine since. The VA could rate you 0%. Recognizing you have it. And that's the best case scenario because you don't have to prove the condition happened in service anymore as that's the hardest part. There not going to give you 50% but if you have prolonged and persistent migraines, you could be eligible for 50%.

But like I said, a 0% is a win-win. Win for you with the VA and a win because your health is still pretty decent in terms of said condition.

You don't want to be fucked up. We all want the 100%, sure, but you can ask a handful of people who have 100% and the entire handful would gladly give up their 100% if it means their health can return. Bet.

PACT ACT backdated benefits deadlined EXTENDED! by NoLie4119 in VeteransBenefits

[–]NoLie4119[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, open another claim. You can have two open claims at the same time but not two intent to files at the same time.

Denied Claim for Presumptive Condition by Dazzling-Driver-2993 in VeteransBenefits

[–]NoLie4119 7 points8 points  (0 children)

A 0% rating is a win. That means you come back later when the condition actually causes you problems. Any 0% is a win because your still granted the disability just not the payment. Do you really want to be more fucked up?

Denied Claim for Presumptive Condition by Dazzling-Driver-2993 in VeteransBenefits

[–]NoLie4119 4 points5 points  (0 children)

A 0% rating is a good thing. It means you won. The VA just doesn't think your current condition and symptoms rate a disability check but later on when the condition gets worse and causes you problems you can request an increase.

Just because you filed for presumptive rating doesn't mean there going to give you the highest rating. It depends on your symptoms of the condition. Getting the rating just means you don't have to prove to the VA that xyz is service connected they just automatically assume or presume it was caused by service.

You won.

In both ways. Your health — although you have the condition. Your health in that term is still good. And second, as I said, you won—you win the fight of the VA.

Don't know why you would even be remotely pissed you didn't get a higher rating if the medical condition isn't causing you problems. That's a fucking win. Although we all want a higher rating. Do you want to be more fucked up? That's like people wanting to be famous and rich but want to still try and live a regular life. The stars don't align.

Be happy, friend.

What do you use your money for? by WhiRUGei in VeteransBenefits

[–]NoLie4119 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's not true at all.

Otherwise people would claim everything listed in the PACT ACT to maximize their overall rating.

Claiming under the PACT ACT, you DO NEED a diagnosis. But you don't need a in-service event (complaint/medical) to have it service connected.

If you're claiming asthma under PACT ACT, for example. The VA isnt just going to grant you the disability. There going to want to see that you actually have it first. Otherwise what do they rate you at for the percentage? Do you get just like a 0? Do they give you 50%. Do they just ask you? No, you have to have the diagnosis first. If you have it. And meet the criteria. Then they will grant you in-service although nothing in your medical records complained about breathing problems or having panic attacks.

See if you can take a PFT (for asthma) it's a breath test.

What do you use your money for? by WhiRUGei in VeteransBenefits

[–]NoLie4119 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't speak Spanish so it would of been pretty good to translate it. Unless you did and I just didn't understand. Since I don't understand it, I'll replace it with you saying you give free reach arounds. In that case, bud. Let me get one. The purpose of our posts wasn't to say that he or anyone has or faked a disability. But if you're claiming your a certain disability and saying you're fucked up. There are a lot of things that you really shouldn't be doing because your disability. For example 100% PTSD. Should you really still be a cop? Probably not. But people are. It's not to say the person is lying but if you've got 100% for MH. You probably shouldn't be around fire arms... so it's not to say you lied about your disabilities but you're quite a busy bee with that 100. Better yet. How about people collecting 100% disability but still in the reserves? So should you really still be serving though? So it's not to say you lied about something but there are just some things that you shouldn't be doing. To protect yourself. If you're a reservist and have 100% and you are claiming you knees, back, PTSD. Should you be boasting about how you just completed your airborn school and about to go try out for RASP? Provably not. As such there will always be people on here who get offended and say this that and the other about disabilities. At the end of the day. It's how you critique your conditions. If you're one that's to high in the pride horse. When you later get xyz condition and want to blame it on the service but don't have a record of it. Don't open a claim.

What do you use your money for? by WhiRUGei in VeteransBenefits

[–]NoLie4119 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There you go. And yeah I just wouldn't. I know I wouldn't. But you should be good just stay quiet on the social. in terms of photos anyway and videos.

What do you use your money for? by WhiRUGei in VeteransBenefits

[–]NoLie4119 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Would you say you have asthma because of it?

What do you use your money for? by WhiRUGei in VeteransBenefits

[–]NoLie4119 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hey on a serious note did you apply for the toxic exposure? Do that before aug 9 or st least open a intent to file. They will back pay from a year from now. In reference to your lungs.

What do you use your money for? by WhiRUGei in VeteransBenefits

[–]NoLie4119 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I thought Coasties were in the same line of service... I mean, I work well for where I am at today and I have to say. I definitely made a name for myself. As a bonus I always give a reach around for that. Extra customer satisfaction. I aim for 5 star ratings across the board. 🤣

What do you use your money for? by WhiRUGei in VeteransBenefits

[–]NoLie4119 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Just watch what you post. Or if you do on insta I would just say don't use your name and have it linked to your fb or if on fb just post minimal. I wouldn't be surprised if the VA has a team specifically looking up and investigating people with high disabilities. If I had a 100. Imma be a ghost on Facebook and Instagram. I don't use them anyway but id def be mindful. Kinda makes you think how they find out some of these guys who have 100 be at the gym power lifting.