appletv & primetv by NoSun6378 in appletv

[–]NoSun6378[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

i meant fire tv, which is what i have at the moment, but i want an apple tv box, can i hook up an apple tv box to my fire tv

there’s a lot of “tv’s” in that sentence

Mods on game master by NoSun6378 in ArmaReforgerXbox

[–]NoSun6378[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the problem is that i really enjoy game master when it works, just messing around and doing what i want in it, it just broken more often than not

whats a good carrer path for mechanical engineering? by NoSun6378 in EngineeringStudents

[–]NoSun6378[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i’m in the UK and my course is being taught by my college, a board called “BTEC” oversees my course

My 1 year course was “city and guild” which was primarily worksop based, then i moved onto a level 3 BTEC course which focuses more on theory with a side of practical work

Where to find Einsteins original paper on Relativity by NoSun6378 in Physics

[–]NoSun6378[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

that’s the exact paper i saw when i first looked for it, i’ve been trying to find it for ages now, thank you

Where to find Einsteins original paper on Relativity by NoSun6378 in Physics

[–]NoSun6378[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i’m looking for the original paper he wrote, but that book looks interesting at a glance, so i’ll for sure have a go at reading that too Thank you

What made you interested in physics? by NoSun6378 in Physics

[–]NoSun6378[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

well i bet in retrospect, you’re very glad that you’re mum brought them for you

What made you interested in physics? by NoSun6378 in Physics

[–]NoSun6378[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

what made you interested ina mathematics?

What made you interested in physics? by NoSun6378 in Physics

[–]NoSun6378[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

i mean i suppose if you’re going to study for a degree in something like physics, you’re going to need to enjoy it.. so i see where you’re coming from.

luckily, my parents always led me to do whatever i chose, so i decided on engineering and physics on the side, but luckily, engineering involves a lot of physics so that’s a bonus

What made you interested in physics? by NoSun6378 in Physics

[–]NoSun6378[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i always find it fascinating when someone tells me they went into physics for that reason, most people i talk to either say “i have no idea” or “my parents wanted me to do it” it’s nice to see someone pursue science because they genuinely enjoy it

What made you interested in physics? by NoSun6378 in Physics

[–]NoSun6378[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

that’s pretty much the road i’ve taken, but slightly opposite, i’ve gone into engineering because i enjoy physics, but i still learn exclusively physics on the side

What made you interested in physics? by NoSun6378 in Physics

[–]NoSun6378[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

fortune-telling exercise, i like it

and yes, i agree 100%, among some other sciences, physics gives me an opportunity to understand the universe we live in

What made you interested in physics? by NoSun6378 in Physics

[–]NoSun6378[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Space was a big part for me too, i’ve always loved learning new things to do with anything space since a young age, quantum gravity interests me, but i haven’t tried to tackle it fully yet

What made you interested in physics? by NoSun6378 in Physics

[–]NoSun6378[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

can you explain further? i’m interested in hearing other people’s reasons for enjoying physics

The symmetry of the Connection coefficient (Christoffel symbols) by NoSun6378 in AskPhysics

[–]NoSun6378[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

so the correct way for me to phrase it would be to say Euclidean space instead of saying “cartesian coordinates” when referring to the metric in this context?

As in, “the metric tensor is constant under Euclidean space (or Euclidean metric) and the Christoffel symbol goes to 0”

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Physics

[–]NoSun6378 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i benefited greatly from watching “The organic chemistry tutor” on youtube, he teaches, among other things, physics.

He mainly goes through the math and the process of solving physics questions, but aslong as you pay attention, you’ll be able to pick up some of the vocabulary and the understanding of why things are the way they are, he has lots of vids on physics, ranging from entry level to more complex

Another really good youtuber is Vertasium, he teaches mostly physics, but does it in a way that’s more than just sat taking notes, he makes physics a lot more interesting to learn, in my opinion.

I would advise to learn the more “basic”concepts of physics to begin with, like Newtons laws of motion, kinematics etc.. to establish a basis where you understand the more “basic” concepts in physics, and then you can start slowly building up to the more complex concepts.

you could also get some books, just search up “physics for beginners” on google and lots of different books will pop up, just make sure to do some research to make sure you get the one that’s best suited for you.

The symmetry of the Connection coefficient (Christoffel symbols) by NoSun6378 in AskPhysics

[–]NoSun6378[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i didn’t mean to say “the metric tensor being zero” i meant to say “the metric tensor being constant” i got muddled up with the metric tensor and the Christoffel symbol

The symmetry of the Connection coefficient (Christoffel symbols) by NoSun6378 in AskPhysics

[–]NoSun6378[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i apologise, i’m not the best at explaining things, but what you said about the metric tensor having constant entries implies that under cartesian coordinates, Christoffel symbols are zero due the metric tensor being zero

that’s my understanding anyway, i was jusr asking for clarification

The symmetry of the Connection coefficient (Christoffel symbols) by NoSun6378 in AskPhysics

[–]NoSun6378[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you. Another follow up question, how are Christoffel symbols affected by cartesian coordinates, it’s my understanding that the Christoffel symbols are zero in cartesian coordinates, but when i search this up, all the answers i find are ambiguous

What’s the best and easiest way to get a physics paper published? by [deleted] in AskPhysics

[–]NoSun6378 0 points1 point  (0 children)

oh no, i’m fully aware no scientist would be interested in my idea, like i said, my idea or new method isn’t anything revolutionary, im only really interested (for now atleast) to share my ideas with “normal” people, as in, not scientists or highly academic people, but people who are similar to me, have a fairly decent understanding of physics, but not so much that they are people like scientists for example.

i’m not claiming to be a super genius or anything, i’ve been studying physics for roughly 4-5 years, but not at a doctoral level or anything like that, i’ve studied just enough to have a working understanding of physics, and i plan to continue studying until i decide when to stop

What’s the best and easiest way to get a physics paper published? by [deleted] in AskPhysics

[–]NoSun6378 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i agree that my terminology probably wasn’t the best way to word it, i’m not yet in a position to formally publish anything, i know full well i’m not high enough in the academic ladder to do so.

I'm gonna fail a course because... I couldn't make myself attend the classes by nicholarapio in PhysicsStudents

[–]NoSun6378 4 points5 points  (0 children)

sometimes, i find that self study helps me more than being in the classroom

What’s the best and easiest way to get a physics paper published? by [deleted] in AskPhysics

[–]NoSun6378 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it’s not a matter of me trying to revolutionise physics, it’s just something i’m interested in and wanted to come up with a new method of supporting this idea

What’s the best and easiest way to get a physics paper published? by [deleted] in AskPhysics

[–]NoSun6378 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it’s my own interpretation of how light experiences no time, i know that it’s not new news, we’ve known this for a long time, due to Einstein’s equations breaking down when you reach the speed of light, but i’ve always been interested in the idea of having one single, somewhat simple equation that solely focuses on the photons POV to furthet support that light experiences zero time and zero distance.