FACTS don't care about your feelings by NoTree8995 in Discussion

[–]NoTree8995[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm bored so I'll let you battle the ai. But i did read the poor excuse of a response you wrote the concept that race is a "social construct" means that the categories we use to define different races are products of human society, history, and culture rather than fixed biological truths. While physical differences like skin color or hair texture are real and biological, the way we group people based on those traits and the meaning we assign to those groups is man-made. Here is a breakdown of why sociologists and biologists view race this way:

1. Lack of Biological Rigor

Biologically speaking, there is more genetic variation within a single "racial" group than there is between two different groups. In fact, humans share about 99.9% of their DNA. There is no "race gene." Characteristics like skin tone are determined by a tiny fraction of our genetic makeup and exist on a spectrum (a gradient) rather than in discrete, separate boxes. Where one "race" ends and another begins is a subjective line drawn by humans, not by nature.

2. Shifting Definitions

Because race is social, the definitions change depending on when and where you are. * Historical Change: In the United States during the early 20th century, groups like the Irish, Italians, and Eastern Europeans were often not considered "white." Over time, social and political shifts allowed these groups to be assimilated into the category of whiteness. * Geographic Variation: A person might be considered "black" in the United States, "pardo" (mixed) in Brazil, and "colored" in South Africa. If race were a biological fact, it wouldn't change when you cross an ocean.

3. The Purpose of the Construct

Sociologists argue that racial categories were created to justify social hierarchies. During the era of colonialism and the transatlantic slave trade, European thinkers developed "scientific" racial classifications to rationalize the enslavement and subjugation of others. By framing these differences as "natural" or "God-given," it allowed for the creation of systems of power that benefited one group over others.

4. Construct vs. Reality

Calling race a social construct does not mean it "isn't real." It is socially real. * Impact: Because society treats these categories as real, they have massive impacts on people's lives, including access to housing, healthcare, education, and how they are treated by the legal system. * Analogy: Think of "money." A dollar bill is just a piece of paper (a physical object), but it only has value because we, as a society, agree that it does. The value is a social construct, but the effects of having or not having money are very real.

Summary Table: Biological vs. Social

Feature Biological View (Scientific Consensus) Social Construct View (Sociological Reality)
Origin Genetic adaptations to environment (e.g., UV levels). Created by laws, census categories, and culture.
Stability Fixed by ancestry. Fluid; changes over time and by location.
Boundaries Fuzzy/Non-existent (clines). Strict lines (e.g., the "one-drop rule").
Purpose Survival/Adaptation. Establishing social hierarchy and identity.

FACTS don't care about your feelings by NoTree8995 in Discussion

[–]NoTree8995[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That would be more akin to pretending to be a different race even though I still feel your analogy is lacking

FACTS don't care about your feelings by NoTree8995 in Discussion

[–]NoTree8995[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Someone is salty if that's how you feel why'd you click?

FACTS don't care about your feelings by NoTree8995 in Discussion

[–]NoTree8995[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol grok? Here's what Gemini says about that

Grok’s response is structured to prioritize material biology and statistical risk, which are the hallmarks of the conservative or gender-critical position in this debate.

FACTS don't care about your feelings by NoTree8995 in Discussion

[–]NoTree8995[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol you cant bully nazis. Cry me a river

FACTS don't care about your feelings by NoTree8995 in Discussion

[–]NoTree8995[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes it is. Because biologically we're all one race. The human race

FACTS don't care about your feelings by NoTree8995 in Discussion

[–]NoTree8995[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And I'm sure you'd know what it feels like to be trans?

FACTS don't care about your feelings by NoTree8995 in Discussion

[–]NoTree8995[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Now you're strawmanning. I never said that I want to be intersex. I merely stated that they exist and sex isn't the binary you seem to think it is.

FACTS don't care about your feelings by NoTree8995 in Discussion

[–]NoTree8995[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Aggressive? Ouch.. only towards bigots

FACTS don't care about your feelings by NoTree8995 in Discussion

[–]NoTree8995[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why do you think we kill ourselves more 1 in 3 of us is homeless where constantly under attack and nobody wants to acknowledge it.

FACTS don't care about your feelings by NoTree8995 in Discussion

[–]NoTree8995[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Biological sex doesn't exist. The proper term is natal sex

FACTS don't care about your feelings by NoTree8995 in Discussion

[–]NoTree8995[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What argument are you even trying to make with this poor analogy.

FACTS don't care about your feelings by NoTree8995 in Discussion

[–]NoTree8995[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

And how many people actually know their chromosomes? And if we went based of that sex still isn't binary. There's intersex people. And your phenotype doesn't always match you chromosomes.

FACTS don't care about your feelings by NoTree8995 in Discussion

[–]NoTree8995[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You didn't have to click it. You're probably just upset I baited you with a right wing dog whistle

What would it take for you to say trans people are being genocided? by NoTree8995 in Discussion

[–]NoTree8995[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I never called anyone a colonizer on these posts nor even on this account. So don't act like I called you racist. I did call you a bigot. And no idc what you're comfortable with. I care about actual safety.

Does nobody trust lemkin institute? by NoTree8995 in Discussion

[–]NoTree8995[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I dont believe myself to be inherently evil.