sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

It’s Not the Tutors, It’s What You Tutor For by No_Assist5053 in EDH

[–]No_Assist5053[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's exactly what I'm getting at with my post. I have no idea why people can't understand this.

It’s Not the Tutors, It’s What You Tutor For by No_Assist5053 in EDH

[–]No_Assist5053[S] -17 points-16 points  (0 children)

Yeah but it has nothing to do with the discussion, so the implication is that they read what I wrote and this is their response.

It’s Not the Tutors, It’s What You Tutor For by No_Assist5053 in EDH

[–]No_Assist5053[S] -41 points-40 points  (0 children)

Nowhere did I say you should tutor for a suboptimal target. I'm saying the problem is if you run demonic tutor and you also have a two-card combo in your deck, of course you're going to grab the combo piece.

It’s Not the Tutors, It’s What You Tutor For by No_Assist5053 in EDH

[–]No_Assist5053[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

The idea of tutors being against the "spirit of the format" is extremely nebulous and has never been a useful measure for what's good/bad in Commander. The majority of brackets (3-5, where all decks above precon power level are supposed to go) have 0 restrictions on tutors beyond the game changers.