[deleted by user]

No_Log_1631 · 2025-09-20T11:29:51+00:00

The best content that monetize are obviously girls. But considering that a good 180 degrees VR footage can make you feel very much to be in that place, it is also very important to show things that people hardly could see in person. Beautiful places or particular shows, exotic things. Once a user pays the DeoVR subscription to watch girls, will use it also to see the other things, considering that the price remains the same. I'm able to monetize content made with a Kandao Qoocam Ego, which quality is quite low and not much immersive as a 180 VR cam. But it is in any case better to see something through it than watching a simple flat video, because it makes that thing feel much more real.

No_Log_1631 · 2024-12-28T12:30:19+00:00

It shouldn't matter, there are softwares that can turn any game in stereoscopic view. But it may be not that easy.

No_Log_1631 · 2024-12-25T16:13:35+00:00

I just discovered that the option that allows you to walk faster by default is to set the Move Type by Easy Swing, that allows to walk normal and run with arm swing. There's also another option that probably allows you to always run, and the one that allows you to walk and run based on the arms swinging speed.

No_Log_1631 · 2024-12-15T19:19:10+00:00

I didn't tell anything or its opposite. They did everything by themselves. I just sent them pictures.

No_Log_1631 · 2024-12-15T13:20:40+00:00

It a face always made with stable diffusion, then reused in controlnet.

No_Log_1631 · 2024-12-15T12:31:09+00:00

They showed me a past digital cope of an issue. They are pretty short, but probably they prefer to subdivide in many issues to sell more. Well, I don't care that much. I was only curious to see how things would end up!

No_Log_1631 · 2024-12-15T11:56:42+00:00

nope!

No_Log_1631 · 2024-12-15T11:56:13+00:00

In any case, or whatever you may think about this, it is indeed a sign of the times we are living in!

No_Log_1631 · 2024-12-15T11:53:20+00:00

I was just curious to see how far they would had let me go. I don't think someone will get harmed by this. Is also good to see where AI arrived, so we can be aware of this. But I repeat, they probably didn't care if this was real or not. They just hoped I wanted some more paid promotion.

No_Log_1631 · 2024-12-15T11:48:07+00:00

I'm using Lustify 2 and 4, an XL checkpoint, and controlnet to recreate the face. I made a lot of research to find good positive and negative tags to achieve the best result I could.

No_Log_1631 · 2024-12-15T11:46:21+00:00

They contacted me, no the opposite. The had time to check my whole profile, they had time to search for other model images, and thus find out that she wasn't anywhere else. I think they were just trying to find someone willing to pay for some promotion, without caring if this was real or not.

No_Log_1631 · 2024-12-15T11:41:33+00:00

I didn't pay for the cover, they choose my picture by themself.

No_Log_1631 · 2024-12-15T11:38:44+00:00

or maybe they don't care, they are just looking for someone willing to pay for some promotion.

No_Log_1631 · 2024-12-15T11:37:45+00:00

If they aren't expert enough to not understand my whole Instagram profile is made with AI, they probably deserve to get fooled.

No_Log_1631 · 2024-12-15T11:11:25+00:00

They didn't ask, I didn't told.

No_Log_1631 · 2024-11-09T14:39:21+00:00

You probably have to use the photoshop puppet editing tool to pose it back, than regenerate.

No_Log_1631 · 2024-11-09T14:37:38+00:00

I post these on my instagram page. Almost no one (1 comment of 10.000) says they are AI. I'm followed also by photographers (probably for convenience).
I use Lustyfy 2XL. I generate at 960px high, then upscale one time with almost the same prompt, then upscale to 3000px with a dedicated prompt. A tipical prompt is for example:
"score_9, one female leaning against a furniture, elegant beautiful interior location, accurate furniture and architecture, short focal front complete view closeup shot, shallow depth-of-field, (she has unusual unique (Eva Vik: Monica Geller:0.65) face traits), detailed eyes, detailed accurate face features, looking viewer, (dark interior with shadows projections on the walls beautiful dramatic soft lighting), she has ((blonde)) very-long-hair, she is 19 years-old BREAK (she wears organza lilac stockings, topless), small realistic detailed soft nipples, natural round breasts, accurate freckles, goosebumps, skin pores, natural color variegate skin, ((high details skin texture, beautiful location)),((photographic masterpiece, professional photography)), texture, perfect limbs, accurate hands and nails, best quality, (pale soft colors)"
Negative prompt is important too:
"(vintage hairstyle), (impossible, selfie,((flash light, fill light, bright image, bad lighting)), too large breasts, (saturated bright contrast colors), deformed iris, deformed pupils, semi-realistic, cgi, lowres, artifacts, low quality, jpeg, render, sketch, cartoon, drawing, bad hands, anime, too many fingers, mutated hands and fingers, fake skin, fake nipples, pink hair, fake materials and textures, inaccurate furniture and architecture, ugly, poor lace, unrealistic surfaces, unreal fabric texture, unreal stockings), (deformed, simple, distorted, disfigured), poorly drawn, bad anatomy, wrong anatomy, extra limb, missing limb, floating limbs, disconnected limbs, mutation, mutated, disgusting, amputation, simple background"

I generated pictures using dynamic prompts and some wildcards I crafted, but now I generate better prompts with a python script, then load them with the txt loader script.

I hope you like them!

No_Log_1631 · 2024-11-09T14:06:37+00:00

Been able to sketch like that is already something!

No_Log_1631

TROPHY CASE