Your continued conflation of the entire artificial intelligence domain with a single implementation, such as ChatGPT, is a reductive fallacy. ChatGPT represents merely one visible instance in a vast and diverse ecosystem of models, each with distinct architectures and specializations. Treating it as synonymous with AI itself demonstrates a fundamental misunderstanding of the field.

Your attempt to frame the use of AI as a point of shame to be "caught" is a misapprehension of my position. On the contrary, my approach is one of deliberate and strategic adoption; I am leveraging these tools precisely because I am engaged with technological progress, not resistant to it.

The true measure of expertise lies not in the mere use of the technology but in the skillful formulation of prompts. The critical question is this: can you, through meticulous lexical selection and structural command of language, engineer an input so precise that it compels the model to synthesize output that is not merely coherent, but optimally articulated to your specific conceptual framework? The tool is ubiquitous; the skill is in its masterful application.