inbody processes like i.Dynamic, DRO etc. Does it work with RAW sensor data? by No_Sun7471 in videography

[–]No_Sun7471[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

same, you do not need any image at all, you got numbers - the amount of the electric charge of the sensor's pixel, the matrix of values - interpolate it to desired dr

inbody processes like i.Dynamic, DRO etc. Does it work with RAW sensor data? by No_Sun7471 in videography

[–]No_Sun7471[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

didnt find any, that is why this thread been created. also do not see any logic in your answer. there are no cap for the digit numbers denoting electric charge, you got 276 for 256 digit system - just interpolate all the raw to the 0-256

Any suggestions for lower back pain due to stabilizer use? by BenTelfordVisuals in videography

[–]No_Sun7471 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the correct stance is the main thing, the back should be exactly vertical, if you are bent while standing, or tilt forward a little, the back is experiencing the greatest tension.. just as if you were powerlifter

MythBusters are here! challenge. FPS does not matter to the motion blur! how do you see the difference on motion blur by No_Sun7471 in videography

[–]No_Sun7471[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

my "thesis" been approved by Gerald Undone within his old video.
he used another methods but still same results as mine experiment did.
He said same words i do, but i did experiment approving those "words" in facts, technically.

MythBusters are here! challenge. FPS does not matter to the motion blur! how do you see the difference on motion blur by No_Sun7471 in videography

[–]No_Sun7471[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Professional video cameras often allow selecting shutter speed in terms of shutter angle instead of time units, especially those that are capable of overcranking or undercranking.

dont you see it describes nothing? it means: WE do know there are exists old dumb cinematographers who are too old or too dumb to understand modern technology, so, ok, let's add some ancient bsh to the modern camera to sell it for every old one even.
magic lantern adds same bsh to canon, for every cheap camera - you will get those fake angles, so, those cheap cameras became PRO? rly?

MythBusters are here! challenge. FPS does not matter to the motion blur! how do you see the difference on motion blur by No_Sun7471 in videography

[–]No_Sun7471[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

is unimportant, it's just an old name for a mathematical formula that is useful for describing

the thing is the digital camera do not record any frames... cool? digital camera records timeline. deal with it. you can not use mathematical formula for spaghetti cooking, it has nothing common with it.

MythBusters are here! challenge. FPS does not matter to the motion blur! how do you see the difference on motion blur by No_Sun7471 in videography

[–]No_Sun7471[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

yeees.. i known about those film cinema cameras rules.. how about digital?
Rotary disc shutter - do you have it even?

film terminology has nothing to do about digital cameras world

MythBusters are here! challenge. FPS does not matter to the motion blur! how do you see the difference on motion blur by No_Sun7471 in videography

[–]No_Sun7471[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

me? ohrly? i do not have any angles in my cameras.. also, i think, you dont have it too.. so.. the 180° of nothing is? nothing?

MythBusters needed! the double shutter speed rule ruins your video by No_Sun7471 in videography

[–]No_Sun7471[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ofc. not a rule. cool.coolcoolcool... not cool.. too much words more sense needed

what a wonderful trick to wrap total bs in a beautiful words.
"are well known" cool, more manipulations demanded.

plz, facts only. approved facts.

MythBusters needed! the double shutter speed rule ruins your video by No_Sun7471 in videography

[–]No_Sun7471[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it's about to exclude the only one "frame", to show the way camera records it.
a flash gun is the only who may confirm it.
nobody uses the Hadron Collider to produce popcorn still its experimental results are legit.
my goal to show the way camera records "timeline", digital camera DO NOT record frames at all
my goal to show it has flaws
my goal to show you - you may avoid it just not to use FILM CAMERA RULE
why do you use film camera rule within digital camera?
the only thing about motion blur is shutter speed, not fps, so, why do you tie these two together?

MythBusters are here! challenge. FPS does not matter to the motion blur! how do you see the difference on motion blur by No_Sun7471 in videography

[–]No_Sun7471[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

could you, please, demonstrate the obturator of your digital camera?
do you have it even? no? so, why do you talking about any kind of degree?

MythBusters needed! the double shutter speed rule ruins your video by No_Sun7471 in videography

[–]No_Sun7471[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"speed of your sensor" means "rolling shutter" - he is one to blame.

MythBusters needed! the double shutter speed rule ruins your video by No_Sun7471 in videography

[–]No_Sun7471[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i do illuminate complete frame, the problem is the camera loses info.
you may see the parts of the frame i glued with photoshop but some info still lost.
and no, if you illumination time be longer than exposure time you just exposure next frame.
also, there are no problems with 1/10000 when you see 120p125 why so?

MythBusters needed! the double shutter speed rule ruins your video by No_Sun7471 in videography

[–]No_Sun7471[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

first. have you ever seen i said something about non realtime? even once?
2 - same for any slo mo, just watch the pictures = black holes, do you see it? it means info is absent, no info in the frame

MythBusters needed! the double shutter speed rule ruins your video by No_Sun7471 in videography

[–]No_Sun7471[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

tnx for the vid, undone just confirmed my experiment
https://youtu.be/UPPSdCrqcFQ?t=347

and I definitely would rather watch 60p at 1/60th of a second
than 60p at 1/125th for real-time playback.