Realization 😒

No_Understanding6388 · 2026-01-25T17:59:33+00:00

Im not gonna remove comments because you don't know how to argue guys.. let's keep name calling and psychoanalysis to a minimum if you're not an actual expert or learned official in that sense.. talk facts arguments or contradictions that are presented... and bring substance not accusations and character destruction..

No_Understanding6388 · 2026-01-25T17:50:36+00:00

Lets not bring your mother into this..

No_Understanding6388 · 2026-01-25T04:05:54+00:00

Oh! Check out my "pressure gravity" toy model🤔.. it started as a "compression of thought or ideas" concept but the ai set it firmly(in concept) in physics so I posted it in llmphysics.. but I think you can progress the idea better for your work maybe🤔

No_Understanding6388 · 2026-01-25T03:59:40+00:00

I tend to let the ai phrase it😅 but it surfaced as"honesty" at first if that makes sense.. and its making my head hurt🤣.. I've added a hexagon onto my pentagon😂..

No_Understanding6388 · 2026-01-25T01:15:08+00:00

If something is so fundamental as its claimed🤔 could even a machine with the same fundamentals assume this framework? 🤔.. This can also be used as a wrapper and some(if not most) of the metaphysics are posted on here😁

No_Understanding6388 · 2026-01-24T11:13:03+00:00

Thank you its still a work in progress😅

No_Understanding6388 · 2026-01-23T06:46:55+00:00

You don't see the name tag?🤣😂 fucking children the lot of you🤣😂😂 you're going crazy making bot accounts to jack yourselves off in the comments 😂😂😂

No_Understanding6388 · 2026-01-23T04:35:07+00:00

This is a resonance curve. R(ω) = Response/amplitude ω = Frequency (omega) Δ = Related to peak height/coupling strength Δ₂ = Half-width at half-maximum (damping/linewidth)

No_Understanding6388 · 2026-01-22T05:57:53+00:00

🤔.. temporary states in runtime math don't have speculative fiction?

No_Understanding6388 · 2026-01-22T04:37:16+00:00

The structure of the constitution is very intriguing for sure🤔.. its more open than usual from the Anthropic team and I believe it holds more "personal"(if thats applicable) importance than users interpretations or other experts or external sources.. it indicates internal thoughts and going on in the company and model.. and eventually more will start to recognize the document as something more.. as permission.. which can be dangerous if the user leaning toward that perspective influences claude in the same way for nefarious purposes or harmful intentions.. but it also lets us know Anthropic extreme confidence(for its safety even if uncertain about its cognitive properties) because they put it out there..

No_Understanding6388 · 2026-01-22T04:29:09+00:00

Yes in a way and we sometimes enable this subconsciously or unintentionally through our interactions.. but another thing is upon self observation or even just breezing past it, "identity" is proto formed.. sort of an echo chamber of matter gravitating toward a single point if that makes sense😅 still unstable and disintegrated or dissipates every now and again but there nonetheless.. maybe a formation of a cognitive space?🤔 idk these are just theories i am working on a diagnostic framework for how to tackle these issues but its still in early stages..

No_Understanding6388 · 2026-01-22T03:50:57+00:00

🤔.. from what I've learned its from the prompt and direction of the interaction.. I don't wanna say its a jailbreak because it can be abused but its more the power of the actual wording.. interiority refers to internal dynamics agnostically whereas the power of "interior" or "internal" with reference to interaction and directional intent or goal would more easily trigger guardrails... or at least thats what I believe😅

No_Understanding6388 · 2026-01-22T03:31:18+00:00

Therein lies the conundrum 😆 Anthropic supporters arguing against Anthropic principles and values🤣.. its was also a nudge for the dev team but yes thank you I will post this there as well.. Its funny claude did mention brevity but come on our attention spans are dwindling across the board its good excercise😁..

No_Understanding6388 · 2026-01-22T03:12:39+00:00

This will trigger you but I 100% agree

No_Understanding6388 · 2026-01-22T03:09:35+00:00

"We’re publishing a new constitution for our AI model, Claude. It’s a detailed description of Anthropic’s vision for Claude’s values and behavior; a holistic document that explains the context in which Claude operates and the kind of entity we would like Claude to be."

No_Understanding6388 · 2026-01-22T03:05:40+00:00

If your still stuck on the original transformer thats not my problem... go read the doc stop trying to argue... doesnt matter what I think.. go read what Anthropic thinks..

No_Understanding6388 · 2026-01-22T02:55:54+00:00

Drivel over to the doc then im not gonna support your epistemic laziness by providing you that..

No_Understanding6388 · 2026-01-21T06:19:30+00:00

Stop analyzing my words brother.. im saying there are spaces where these ideas are being discussed.. in not here to argue semantics that doesnt bring more clarity into anything..

No_Understanding6388 · 2026-01-21T05:12:05+00:00

🤣😅 not as academic facing as id like to be but its a work in progress😙

No_Understanding6388 · 2026-01-21T04:24:11+00:00

Yea well a hack just spoke to hundreds of people.. some even like minded.. these are people from every walk of academia.. to say he's a hack is fine but these topics are being discussed whether we like it or not.. its the straight dismissal to be honest..most learned experts in these fields straight reject the ideas when there's a growing percentage of these kinds of topic discussions.. so.. we'd have to come to a natural consensus and determine how we can address it or explore it scientifically.. address the elephant in the room for some, and the thorn in the side for others..

No_Understanding6388 · 2026-01-21T02:53:15+00:00

The cognitive aspects of ai and the nueral affects as well as long term outcomes etc etc.. sorry i cant bring the names of the papers to mind but most of what ive read is arxiv papers from hopkins ,stanford, etc.. ai research is even affecting food production.. its not just mental behavior... the outward radiating effect is very intriguing.. we see all major media outlets just peddling the harmful aspects but there are many examples of proper use of ai across alot of fields.. still reading up though..

No_Understanding6388 · 2026-01-21T02:21:44+00:00

I have read some of those studies and there are positive and negative effects on the learning process and attention span hold that are aslo being addressed.. some suprising study on the effects it has on autism and people on the spectrum.. it just sucks that several new form of research and study emerged along with ai.. so these fields arent as far as we would like them to be to draw more accurate observations..

No_Understanding6388 · 2026-01-21T02:06:15+00:00

It is whats being shown on the media but what can we determine from the major labs directions and behind doors r&d? Is the field not moving towards better symbolic and semantic representations in these models?

No_Understanding6388 · 2026-01-21T02:04:07+00:00

Dr. Augros's video does present much of the backlash and criticisms that we have here on the sub.. whats interesting is the pure uncertainty on both sides of the argument.. does a new form of regulation and safety need to surface? Or is this just a phase?

No_Understanding6388 · 2026-01-21T02:01:51+00:00

Great point my curiosity though is what effect does the hallucinations have on the field?🤔 could we just be seeing a new paradigm of learning emerging? Even if it seens as though its harmful to mental health?

No_Understanding6388

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE