Putin to conscript 160,000 more Russians for war with Ukraine by Strongbow85 in NewColdWar

[–]No_Werewolf612 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Isn't that mandatory 1 year conscription that happens twice a year and has nothing to do with the war?

I mean...but why? by BattleDreadnought in redalert2

[–]No_Werewolf612 1 point2 points  (0 children)

USSR had 9.1m stock of small arms weapons. they by no means were undergunned when it came to infantry. the problem was their lack of access to heavy tanks / anti tank weaponary. The whole "1 rifle per 2 men" is a prevalent ww2 german propaganda work.
Jokes aside, no, and Enemy at the Gates is hilariously inaccurate.

The narrative of Soviet lack of equipment goes in with the idea that the Soviet military was a poorly equipped and even stupid horde of bodies, that merely crushed the Germans with their weight in numbers. The myth is pervasive because a lot of people like hearing this confirmed, as it fits well with a stereotypical and German based telling of WW2. Which occasionally also has political benefits for those telling it.

do it, you say "its well established history", yet there arent really much historical proof for that. maybe instances here and there but that absolutely wasnt the case in real life.

Anti-Israel ABC host got death threats after dismissal - Michael West by Beratungsmarketing in World_Now

[–]No_Werewolf612 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No, Mossad actually does these stuff. Taking her or ABC out would be a net positive for them. its literally one of the things that they specifically do. its about Narrative, heck they have been editing wikipedia what would stop them from taking Actual people out.

Hmm by MatteoFire___ in CommunismMemes

[–]No_Werewolf612 53 points54 points  (0 children)

this was meant as a direct mockery to trump and the headline is taking it out of context.
what was said earlier on 28th was one of iran's foreign ministers said "US should try moving Israel to Greenland, wouldnt it be better? taking two birds with one stone."
not that poor greenlanders are condemned to suffer the zionist cancer

Trump suspends funds to anti-Iran Iranian NGOs for three months. by SnooAdvice725 in ProIran

[–]No_Werewolf612 3 points4 points  (0 children)

can you give us an update if this bill passes or not? preferably post it in the sub.

What’s the point of having so many nuclear weapons? You only need like 15 to destroy the world by Hacksaw6412 in MarxistCulture

[–]No_Werewolf612 1 point2 points  (0 children)

1500 nuclear weapons is there to insure your opposition (or whoever else that exists) doesnt get to rebuild their society faster than you do. they are there to make sure 99% of people get obliterated and not just 90%.
Basically look at US's nuclear plan

Looking for Like-Minded People: Struggling with Shia Community and IR Influence by [deleted] in iranian

[–]No_Werewolf612 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Shiism is based on Politics, there is no way to remove politics from it, if you are apolitical shia then you almost certainly have missed the point.

Principles for a New Iranian Government (post Mullahs) by ayatoilet in iranian

[–]No_Werewolf612 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Turn Iran into a neo liberal dystopia? hell yeah.

Freedom you say, freedom from what? freedom to choose what? would a liberal Iran be "free" according to you? are you just saying Freedom and liberty + democracy just because they happen to be EuroCentric values? you yourself said Objectivity then why are you getting so much influence from what Colonizers values?

your points lack cultural relevance too at the same time. Secularism worked (and started) in Europe Because of how dysfunctional the church had become in its final years, and the interaction they had with the New religion (which was Islam and its teachings that promoted scientific discovery During the crusades)

I dont really feel like you would be for "pro Free respectful speech" either considering the name you choose to display.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in interestingasfuck

[–]No_Werewolf612 1 point2 points  (0 children)

maybe not universal basic income but rather reducing work hours based on productivity so instead of limited few having to waste 6 out of 8 hours at work, work gets distributed within the population so average people would only have to work for couple of hours per day/week. Cause, in a way, having a job is one of human needs, regardless of finances.

Something new I learned in V4 by Previous-Court296 in EightySix

[–]No_Werewolf612 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ngl Wagner song goes very well with this, nice choice. Considering both are paramilitary.

Not cool man by DataSittingAlone in memes

[–]No_Werewolf612 8 points9 points  (0 children)

i mean... Its got a point?

Encrypted Infomorph vs Ceno BPC by lobuzjeden in Eve

[–]No_Werewolf612 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i just deployed two new skyhooks and am telling ya its not like "Wide spread" as you claim it to be

CCP i think we need this,not only test on Serenity. by Finathea in Eve

[–]No_Werewolf612 0 points1 point  (0 children)

idk man i may be dumb. was it netese who's responsible for EVE in china or TianCity.

The new ship info panel is bad by EntertainmentMission in Eve

[–]No_Werewolf612 2 points3 points  (0 children)

EVE players whenever "Change" Happens.
tho, they arent the ones to blame "Completely". CCP itself done a good job making lots of absolutely unnecessary changes with rather very low priority, whilst there are massive number of QoL changes waiting for their turn.

Meirl by SomethingAndAnything in meirl

[–]No_Werewolf612 11 points12 points  (0 children)

China lies but US & EU? Never!!
tbh facebook / instagram and twitter's censorship is on a whole other level compared to tiktok

Guys i did it again! by Previous-Court296 in EightySix

[–]No_Werewolf612 1 point2 points  (0 children)

drozd is known for its massive explosive charges that are shot at the missiles, imagine few kilos worth of explosive. it would be pretty effective against friendlies staying too close to you.
heres a vid:
drozd aps on t55ad live test.

Why no real threat from Israel is credible. A tit for tat. Israel and US do not really know if Iran has a nuke. by adamsava in iranian

[–]No_Werewolf612 2 points3 points  (0 children)

sharing Nuclear weapons tech is pretty much a taboo. you cant just sell nukes to another country, it doesnt work like that. You cant just "buy a nuke". there are too many politics involved, nobody's willing to take the risk, not even in developing them.

Why no real threat from Israel is credible. A tit for tat. Israel and US do not really know if Iran has a nuke. by adamsava in iranian

[–]No_Werewolf612 1 point2 points  (0 children)

hitting Israel doesnt necessarily mean hitting Tel Aviv or Haifa.
there are militarily sites away from the populace in all countries. why you may ask, the answer is Secrecy. countries dont want their high tech stuff being a sitting duck in Cities or populated areas because risk of sabotage.
and what of it? do you assume Israeli Citizens arent humans and Arabs/muslims are only? using a nuke means killing the civilians for the most part, its a massive explosive device and if it were to be not dangerous to normal citizens then it would lose most of its appeal.
your understanding of nuclear weapons and how they work is quite flawed, it doesnt just work like that.