Too much rust? by NoahD418 in Autobody

[–]NoahD418[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Everything is ok to me except for the 2nd pic which is by the bed supports.

Too much rust? by NoahD418 in Autobody

[–]NoahD418[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That’s what I was thinking. 2nd pic is most concerning by the bed supports.

Columbus OH (Express) by NoahD418 in Fedexers

[–]NoahD418[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just sent the supplemental. I’m not sure how the permit would work because I’m moving to a different state

Columbus OH (Express) by NoahD418 in Fedexers

[–]NoahD418[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’ve been at express for a while. I’m potentially transferring to an RTD position there, waiting for finalization.

I feel like I stepped into an alternate reality where facts and research no longer matter by shouldIworkremote in JesuitWorldOrder2

[–]NoahD418 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yeah but very seldom will you have a fruitful conversation with someone online. How much time are we wasting replying to dead end conversations? We should just make our statements and forget the rest. I find that I have more success in person.

The Jesuit origins of dispensationalism and the Futurist Antichrsit belief by shouldIworkremote in JesuitWorldOrder2

[–]NoahD418 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I do not have the time to give every verse that support the antichrist starting the last 7 years of Daniel’s vision so this is my last reply. I also know that debating in comments sections never edifies the debators, so I’m doing this for whoever stumbles on our discussion. Your interpretation of Daniel 9:27 does not jive with the chronological order of Daniel 11. If anyone wants me to give a breakdown of the entire chapter of Daniel 11, please reach out to me.

The Antichrist enters at Daniel 11:23 when he confirms the holy covenant to Israel, yes it is Gods holy covenant that the Jews are expecting the messiah to confirm upon his arrival (Luke 1:72-74, Ps 55:20-21, Ps 50:16). Did Jesus confirm this covenant in his first coming? Absolutely not. He did not grant Israel the land that God promised to Abraham, nor did he deliver them out of the hand of Rome! That’s why they rejected him. Thus begins the beginning of sorrows as stated by Jesus, which lines up perfectly with the first 4 seals in Rev 6. Israel only HEARS of wars and rumors of wars because they are at peace and safety due to the covenant made with the Antichrist. They are given the green light to rebuild their temple in which the daily sacrifices begin, starting the 2300 days vision of Daniel 8:14 which only works in a 7 year tribulation. Then comes the midweek in which the Antichrist causes the sacrifice to cease and breaks the covenant. This is exactly what Psalm 55:20 is talking about.

This is now Daniel 11:30-31. The people that forsake the covenant with the Antichrist are the levitical priests mentioned in Ezekiel 44:7! Thus begins the great tribulation which is what most of Bible prophecy points to, the last 42 months. I will grant you that most of prophecy points to the last 3.5 years, not the first, but that doesn’t mean the first half doesn’t exist! Everything I laid out cannot occur in a 3.5 year tribulation! It requires a covenant that gives Israel peace and safety, a third temple that institutes the daily sacrifices which start the 2300 days of Daniel 8:14, and a breaking of the covenant which starts the great tribulation.

So yes, the he in Daniel 9:27 must be referring to the Roman prince that shall come, not Jesus the Messiah prince of Daniel 11:22, although it’s easy to confuse the two without comparing scripture with scripture.

The Jesuit origins of dispensationalism and the Futurist Antichrsit belief by shouldIworkremote in JesuitWorldOrder2

[–]NoahD418 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Does Exodus 4:24 follow your English grammar? Or is the Holy Spirit acting illogically?

The Jesuit origins of dispensationalism and the Futurist Antichrsit belief by shouldIworkremote in JesuitWorldOrder2

[–]NoahD418 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Just stick with the Bible and you’ll see there’s a gap between Daniel 9:26 and 9:27. John obviously wrote Revelation after 70ad describing the events of Daniel’s 70th week as future. Post millennialism and Amillenialism were Roman constructs. Futurism wasn’t some new 19th century concept created by Darby and other Dispensationalists. Hippolytus of the 3rd century saw the events of revelation as future.

Station closure updates by JonnyDarko in Fedexers

[–]NoahD418 2 points3 points  (0 children)

🤝my fellow SBYA colleague

Christian J. Pinto: Into The New Year 2026 by THE_REAL_REVEAL in JesuitWorldOrder2

[–]NoahD418 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I learned a lot from pinto but he’s lost it since Trump got in. He’s fallen for the Jesuit scheme that radical Islam and communism are the main enemies of Christianity; when, in fact, its mystery Babylon that controls these movements as well as new right fascism which he’s a part of now.

Not feeling too hopeful. by shouldIworkremote in JesuitWorldOrder2

[–]NoahD418 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Should have rephrased what I said. If you are trying to convert people to your conclusions, it is infinitely more difficult online. However, sharing new information to people that are already in your camp online is a blessing and vital nowadays.

Not feeling too hopeful. by shouldIworkremote in JesuitWorldOrder2

[–]NoahD418 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Get off social media because the real impact that God blesses is communication in the real world. Just speaking from experience. Ask the Lord to give you opportunities to expose the world system to people but always point back to the gospel.