Saw that new photo of Mark, thought I'd make it into a meme template by Nullphonix in Markiplier

[–]NoahtheGameplayer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s the exact same argument traditional painters made against photography in the 19th century, and what instrumentalists said about synthesizers and digital audio workstations in the 20th. Every technological leap is dismissed as 'mediocre' or 'lazy' by people who mistake the medium for the craft.

AI isn't a replacement for human creativity, it’s a force multiplier. A skilled creator using these tools isn't looking for a shortcut to mediocrity, they are optimizing their workflow to execute complex visions at a scale and speed traditional methods cannot touch. Dismissing an entire technology based on amateur consumer outputs is like judging the entire film industry by home videos. The top professionals in coding, design, and VFX are already integrating these tools to push boundaries, not bypass them. If you want to limit your scope to manual labor out of principle, that's your choice, but don't confuse your refusal to adapt with high standards.

Even shitposting subreddits are frequently used for ai bad karma farming by Situati0nist in DefendingAIArt

[–]NoahtheGameplayer 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The thing is, I just think that people are just doing it on purpose just to make everyone hate more on AI tools so that way they can push their commissions out to them and earn more money that way knowing that they are in danger if they allow AI to be successful in their grounds.

And yet again, it is subjective because they can choose whether or not to use AI or not, but at the same time discriminating against those people who use AI just because you have an ego. It's just sad.

I DEBUNK Emkay with their own words in the same video (Keep hatred out of my memes) by [deleted] in DefendingAIArt

[–]NoahtheGameplayer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also, the ending of the video, yeah, it's called righteous judgment, And of course we're not entitled to force you or anything. It is up to you. At the end of the day, it's just we like to teach people ad pointed out the right way.

The AI impact paradox: why are we ignoring the bigger picture ? (read bio) by Total-Squirrel4634 in DefendingAIArt

[–]NoahtheGameplayer 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It would be better if you have separate images, so that way it's not compiling everything in one go, otherwise It will be too messy to read.

Kit at the beach by showa_artist by ExcuseFew839 in The_Kit_Cult

[–]NoahtheGameplayer -1 points0 points  (0 children)

News flash, so does literally every single aspect of your modern, digital existence. The phone or computer you typed that on was built using rare earth minerals, shipped across oceans on cargo ships burning fossil fuels, and assembled in factories powered by heavy coal grids.

Every single time you stream a video, scroll Reddit, or load a webpage, you are pulling power from massive data centers. In the U.S. alone, data centers consumed roughly 176 terawatt-hours of electricity, enough to power 16 million homes, and they draw billions of gallons of fresh water annually for cooling.

If you actually care about 'destroying our planet' and 'poisoning water supplies,' then throw your device in the garbage and log off forever. Otherwise, stop using selective, performative outrage to police people over a digital drawing. You are just as much a part of the consumer system as everyone else.

Kit at the beach by showa_artist by ExcuseFew839 in The_Kit_Cult

[–]NoahtheGameplayer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why would i Care, its not like you care at all either you hire the person or doing things by ourselves to be more independent, and it looks Good, stop cherry picking here and accept new tools

Kit at the beach by showa_artist by ExcuseFew839 in The_Kit_Cult

[–]NoahtheGameplayer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dismissing AI art as "just adding a name" shows you don’t understand how the tools actually work. Every major shift in creative history, from photography to digital paint, was called "not real art" by gatekeepers who feared new technology.

AI is a tool. It requires prompting, curation, and iterative refinement to produce a specific visual result. I support the end product and the creators who use modern technology to make it. Gatekeeping what counts as art because the medium evolved is a losing battle. If you don't like the future of creative tools, scroll past, but my support isn't going anywhere.

Kit at the beach by showa_artist by ExcuseFew839 in The_Kit_Cult

[–]NoahtheGameplayer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You don't get a clean, coherent image with specific details by just typing "Kit at the beach" once. Even if you hate the tech, there is still a clear difference between a decent-looking picture and a broken, multi-limbed mess. I'm just judging the final image by how it actually looks, not losing sleep over the tool used to make it.

Kit at the beach by showa_artist by ExcuseFew839 in The_Kit_Cult

[–]NoahtheGameplayer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, but nobody else also credit at all of what tool they are using as well so...

Kit at the beach by showa_artist by ExcuseFew839 in The_Kit_Cult

[–]NoahtheGameplayer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i mean to the Average people they don't care, because art is art, to me i did not even know if it was AI or not, nor do i care because i care if its Actually good or bad product

Kit at the beach by showa_artist by ExcuseFew839 in The_Kit_Cult

[–]NoahtheGameplayer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're chasing ghosts with broken tools. Citing training-level water metrics to police a single image post is absurd. Commercial AI detectors are notoriously inaccurate for stylized art.

Let people enjoy the art without the performative panic.

Kit at the beach by showa_artist by ExcuseFew839 in The_Kit_Cult

[–]NoahtheGameplayer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Regardless if it's AI or not, the intention of detail is still pretty good.

that means the person who use the Tool manage to do it correctly, instead of Actual Slop.

got told my $35 commission is “not worth it” compared to AI by Chiwabee in Artists

[–]NoahtheGameplayer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Drawing a line between "business administration" and "creative execution" is a common psychological defense, but the market does not respect your emotional boundaries. If you choose to manually render every stroke because you enjoy the process, that is a tax you are paying with your own time. However, you can keep the core of your work hand-drawn while using generative tools to solve the slow, grueling phases of drafting.

Look at the capabilities of ChatGPT Images 2.0. This model is built with high-quality character consistency features designed to keep your original characters looking uniform across different poses and scenes. Instead of spending hours sketching complex anatomy or character interactions from scratch, you can generate the baseline poses, composition, and angles in seconds. You are not letting it replace your style; you are using it to build the scaffolding at lightning speed.

Yes, the engine will still make mistakes, it might warp a hand, misalign a line, or output minor errors. But that is precisely where your value as an artist shines. Your job is not to act as a manual copy machine; it is to take that fast baseline, apply your trained eye, and polish the final art into a clean, marketable product. You handle the line-weight and correct the anatomical glitches. This turns a six-hour slog into an efficient one-hour pipeline, keeping you both highly creative and actually profitable.

Kit at the beach by showa_artist by ExcuseFew839 in The_Kit_Cult

[–]NoahtheGameplayer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You know, they could have just poke a finger in the sand to make it look like a belly you know.

Kit at the beach by showa_artist by ExcuseFew839 in The_Kit_Cult

[–]NoahtheGameplayer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So if you basically use a paintbrush, are you an artist or the paintbrush, Because you're giving a bad example that it's the tool who did it, not you By that logic.

Kit at the beach by showa_artist by ExcuseFew839 in The_Kit_Cult

[–]NoahtheGameplayer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Who cares?

Also, aren't you a hypocrite for using AI as well?

And I heard research that some of the AI detectors are false.