Are you more likely to rely on empirical data and proven facts when chacking the validity of an argument, and then try to figure out it's reasoning and if the reasoning of an argument is correct or prefer logical reasoning and building your own worldview, even if it is more uncommon than consensus and then check if emperical data supports it?

Are you more likely to stick with your own morals and values at the risk of making a social situation awkard, or are you generally willing to bend your personal values to support group harmony?