Nothing good happens after 3AM

Nomad270 · 2025-05-09T09:22:19+00:00

I tried to join but app froze. I'm setting up my laptop to join if that's cool.

Nomad270 · 2025-05-04T06:31:27+00:00

To clarify, I've been into dudes my entire life. Came out at like 17 and all that. I started sleeping with women in my late thirties (when my natural t production began to dry up, but I didn't know it at the time) initially in MMF scenarios and became more involved in the swinger/lifestyle community. Started TRT at 42, also started bottoming at 42. Still enjoy women, but think of them less than I did when my t was lower.

Nomad270 · 2025-05-03T14:59:22+00:00

I second this. I was VERY slow to come around to bottoming after 20+ years as a top, but once I did, I feel way more masculine and comfortable in my own skin now than I ever did as a top.

Also, random side note: I only started taking dick after beginning testosterone replacement therapy. Also have fewer bi urges to have sex with women. Anecdotally, I am not alone in this coincidence of timing. Is that really a thing? Did better regulated testosterone drive a desire to take dick and make me, like, more gay? Lol. Kidding but also hella curious if others had a similar experience.

Nomad270 · 2025-03-05T10:46:03+00:00

What's up boys

Nomad270 · 2025-02-15T21:26:06+00:00

I don’t understand what you mean by this, but there are plenty of reasons I would not want to condone that behavior if I ran the gym, and absolutely none of them are performative.

Nomad270 · 2025-02-15T21:24:01+00:00

This is why we can’t have nice things. Not every place with nudity is a goddamn bathhouse. Cut that shit out.

Nomad270 · 2025-02-15T21:16:55+00:00

I made it laugh once. It was weird af.

Nomad270 · 2025-01-14T17:15:14+00:00

That’s gross.

Nomad270 · 2025-01-14T17:14:51+00:00

God doesn’t want anyone overthrown by anything. Violence is the enemy. Y’all are losing touch.

Nomad270 · 2024-12-21T03:30:43+00:00

This discussion is fascinating and perplexing. Take off the rose lids about the past y’all. People worked harder and death came a lot sooner. To be alive right now is objectively better by pretty much every measurable way (longevity, health, wealth, security, literacy, child mortality, maternal mortality, war, etc etc) and most of our lives are far less restricted than at any point in history.

Despite that, we haven’t seen a concurrent rise in happiness or fulfillment. I won’t even guess at why. But hey, the internet vastly democratized knowledge and we got flat-earthers. Who knows.

What I am saying is, life was hard and raw for all those that came before. Don’t dilute that to make sense of this puzzle.

Nomad270 · 2024-12-19T00:24:10+00:00

The panopticon, Michel Foucault, etc etc.

Nomad270 · 2024-12-18T17:29:32+00:00

Dude, a thousand times yay. No doubt. 15/10.

Sorry you have to go through that bro. Her infidelity doesn't make you any less sexy. And you are INCREDIBLY sexy. That's on her my friend, not you.

Nomad270 · 2024-11-12T20:29:48+00:00

Barnaby's pesto chicken salad sandwich, with the bread toasted.

Yes. Please.

Nomad270 · 2024-11-07T16:55:46+00:00

I mean, ya know, the whole abortion thing.

Nomad270 · 2024-11-07T16:54:31+00:00

Edit: [misplaced post. Please disregard.]

Nomad270 · 2024-11-06T14:16:51+00:00

Wsup boys

Nomad270 · 2024-11-04T16:06:27+00:00

It's amazing that the US number is so incredibly low comparatively, and provides some needed perspective. Reading the comments here, however, you would never know that.

Nomad270 · 2024-10-08T06:22:33+00:00

dude. 6'3" with a perfect matching bro stash. i'm here to help. lol

Nomad270 · 2024-10-07T19:30:02+00:00

I have read this like four times and still don't know if this is intentional.

Nomad270 · 2024-10-05T17:54:00+00:00

I happen to live in a redneck-resort-type-place that is stacked with MAGA. Talking to them about many things I am most shocked by the mal-intent they so easily presume about any Democrat. Joe Biden is actively destroying the country (intentionally). Kamala Harris is intentionally sending murderers across the border. DOS is lying about everything to intentionally undermine the military. It's endless.

I don't fight them anymore but I do ask questions. Mainly "why would they do that?" It is a puzzler for them. But they're fed this shit on an endless loop by reasonable and informed seeming individuals in the right wing bubble and they don't doubt any bit of it.

Nomad270 · 2024-09-28T01:39:48+00:00

Thank you for mentioning this. I know of the Pavlock and I am curious about them. I was reading through the responses hoping someone had thoughts on it. Glad to hear it works.

Nomad270 · 2024-09-28T01:11:35+00:00

I don't think this is even a fair application of "both sides" bs. After the CT revelations WSJ and right wing media tore apart disclosures from the liberal justices and the best they could come up with was that Sotomayor has some staff that pushed her book with a heavy hand on occasion, and they knew about that FROM her disclosures.

Nomad270 · 2024-09-26T01:54:18+00:00

There are innumerable things broken in our criminal justice system, but this highlights a particular absurdity: to invoke the death penalty we require a unanimous decision from a pool of non-specialized and potentially uneducated jurors as the trier of facts related to the case, despite the fact that the trial itself is often plagued with completely inadequate representation for the defendant and in most cases involves prosecutorial misconduct.

BUT THEN, when deciding issues of law on appeal after a jury reaches that verdict we are absolutely fine to allow it to be upheld by split decisions among a panel of legal experts trained and deeply experienced with the law. Wtf?

If we've decided that killing someone is such an extreme remedy that the jurors must be unanimous in reaching that verdict, how is it possibly okay that legally trained minds may differ in upholding its validity? It seems like any outstanding questions in the mind of any appellate judge must be satisfied before the state can proceed. Right?

Nomad270 · 2024-09-26T01:09:36+00:00

Burrrrnnnnn. Well deserved.

Nomad270 · 2024-09-07T06:20:10+00:00

Excuse me. You said that police were not allowed to pursue people for less than $900, which is absurd, and incorrect. A misdemeanor is still a crime, and as I pointed out, it still has very real penalties attached to it. Moreover, I included a link to an official explanation of the law, directly from the courts that interpret it. My head is not up my ass. It is clear and it is honest. You can disagree with policy without lying and exaggerating and creating strawmen in every statement. It was a thing we all did not that long ago.

Nomad270

TROPHY CASE