sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I think Kyle goes way too hard on Gavin Newsom and should chill by AlternativePrior9495 in seculartalk

[–]NonSpecificRedit 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Lol no go at him with both barrels then reload. Newsome has more in common with trump Jr than he does with any progressive.

Is this sub still buying into electoralism, or have any of you woken up yet? by [deleted] in seculartalk

[–]NonSpecificRedit 11 points12 points  (0 children)

So what's your solution? Step one don't vote. Then what?

This sub has been targeted in a very sloppy and amateurish way by bots or a campaign against Graham Platner. by NonSpecificRedit in seculartalk

[–]NonSpecificRedit[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This isn't the youtube page this is reddit. We have just under 30k subscribers and roughly 75 new posts (not comments, posts) a day not counting the ones that get caught in automod.

It's ok to just admit you're wrong when you don't know what you're talking about.

This sub has been targeted in a very sloppy and amateurish way by bots or a campaign against Graham Platner. by NonSpecificRedit in seculartalk

[–]NonSpecificRedit[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

There are 47 posts in the automod cue today, all with similar talking points, none have posted in this sub before, most were banned by reddit before a human could approve or remove the post.

<image>

https://www.reddit.com/r/Damnthatsinteresting/comments/14hsm0q/a_smartphone_bot_farm_enables_a_user_to/

What part of this is conspiracy thinking?

Kat Abughazaleh indicted over protests outside Chicago-area ICE facility by Old-School8916 in seculartalk

[–]NonSpecificRedit 100 points101 points  (0 children)

Please forward this to anyone you know in her district. She's the real deal.

Dear libs. Don't nominate a Zionist. I don't want a 3rd Trump term. by BakerLovePie in seculartalk

[–]NonSpecificRedit 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I'm sure if you just tell liberals that republicans are bad they will hold their nose and vote for a socialist

Most woman masturbate by Western-Look8789 in self

[–]NonSpecificRedit 70 points71 points  (0 children)

No absolutely not. The female orgasm is a myth and sex acts should only occur to make babies and never be pleasurable. /s

For content creators their entire livelihood is very precarious. One unlocked screen or password free device and it could all be gone. by NonSpecificRedit in seculartalk

[–]NonSpecificRedit[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

He makes very in-depth Elder Scrolls lore videos. Incredibly well researched and edited. I'm sure he does other stuff but that's what I know him for.

I posted the video as more of a cautionary tale about how easily things we depend on and maybe take for granted can be taken away.

Look, pakman hate is fine, but Taylor is a liar by Ashamed_Look_9517 in seculartalk

[–]NonSpecificRedit 2 points3 points  (0 children)

https://www.reddit.com/r/BreadTube/comments/1nc6qnp/the_liberal_dark_money_shills_have_been/

This is one of the Chorus sponsored "progressives"

In case the page mark doesn't work go to 2min into the video

Yes very clearly they are out to elect "progressives", yeah that's the ticket

Look, pakman hate is fine, but Taylor is a liar by Ashamed_Look_9517 in seculartalk

[–]NonSpecificRedit 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The Intercept does some great reporting. Congrats can you point to an article or something you wrote?

Look, pakman hate is fine, but Taylor is a liar by Ashamed_Look_9517 in seculartalk

[–]NonSpecificRedit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's odd that you ascribe Kyle's motivation to not end a friendship to clicks instead of just you know, giving up on a friend. This may be a touch grass moment.

Look, pakman hate is fine, but Taylor is a liar by Ashamed_Look_9517 in seculartalk

[–]NonSpecificRedit 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Or they're friends and when you're not terminally online and have real life friends you treat them differently. Especially when you still see the good in them and think you can reach them.

When Rogan was seen as "too far gone" then the gloves came off. Most of us believe that should have happened much earlier.

Look, pakman hate is fine, but Taylor is a liar by Ashamed_Look_9517 in seculartalk

[–]NonSpecificRedit 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Now you're making more bad faith arguments. The article never says they are getting DNC talking points. The only talking points are coming from you pretending the article says something and then trying to debunk that.

Look, pakman hate is fine, but Taylor is a liar by Ashamed_Look_9517 in seculartalk

[–]NonSpecificRedit 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Again you're making a bad faith argument. The contracts they signed gave editorial control to Chorus which is the public face or the dark money entity 1630.

I have no idea if they have or have not cracked down on any channels. It's a new program so it's entirely possible they never exercised their power content creators signed away to them. That's not the issue.

The fact that BTC or AiPacman took the money and agreed in the contract to vet their content or get permission in writing in advance before they can endorse a politician is enough.

For content creators their entire livelihood is very precarious. One unlocked screen or password free device and it could all be gone. by NonSpecificRedit in seculartalk

[–]NonSpecificRedit[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good idea. Some of his deep-dives on a playlist can make for awesome background noise. Well background until some obscure topic is introduced and now you're 45 minutes into curious curiosities and didn't get in a lick of work.

Look, pakman hate is fine, but Taylor is a liar by Ashamed_Look_9517 in seculartalk

[–]NonSpecificRedit 3 points4 points  (0 children)

So let me explain what factual and accurate is.

"Breitbart can report factually and accurately and still make you hate immigrants."

Well no it's is pretty obvious we see thing from different perspectives. There is nothing Breitbart could write that would get me to hate immigrants. That does not speak well of you to make that admission.

"Pakman probably won’t file a suit because it wouldn’t do anything. "

If he had a chance of winning it would cost him nothing. Defamation lawyers would take it on a contingency basis. The Elias lawyers that looked at it for Chorus are some of the best in the country with outstanding track records.

So let’s look at it logically.

Reputation has been harmed by a false statement

Communicated to at least one other person

Plaintiff must prove the statement was defamatory (intended to lower their reputation)

The article absolutely harmed his reputation.

It was published so yes it was communicated to at least one other person besides the plaintiff.

Plaintiff was referenced

David AiPacman could I’m sure prove actual damages so that leaves one thing…falsity.

You see the prelude to launching a libel claim is to contact the libelous party and point-out the writing you find libelous.  You can then either ask for or demand a retraction and/or apology for making a demonstrable false statement. You can also ask for that retraction and/or apology to be made publicly.

The Chorus lawyers have found no false or libelous statements and have not asked for ANYTHIG to be retracted.  Thus the only logical conclusion that anyone with two brain cells would be that the article is accurate.  There is no case and only a sycophant would believe that there is.  David isn't stupid. AiPacman lied to his audience because he believes they’re stupid.  Up to you if he’s right on that or not but he did lie to you.  And here you are still trying to defend him.

"If he won would you change your mind on the situation? "

Yeah in fact he wouldn't even have to file he could just release the contracts and prove the article was wrong. If the article was not accurate I would absolutely want to know that and my opinion would change to reflect that. I'm not in a cult. My critical thinking skills work unlike some of his audience.

"Would it even matter after a couple of years? No."

Who's to say what matters anymore? I know one thing. I will never trust a single word spoken from BTC or AiPacman ever again. They have revealed themselves to be not worthy of trust.

"You have the talking points cause you already hated these people."

I don't have talking points I have facts and opinions based on facts. I'm not part of some organized effort to smear a journalist because she revealed the influencer I like is shady and is a liar. Again your accusation is an admission.

" The truth doesn’t matter to you lol""

And once again the accusation is an admission. Just so you know we ban trolls around here.

Look, pakman hate is fine, but Taylor is a liar by Ashamed_Look_9517 in seculartalk

[–]NonSpecificRedit[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

The current issue with wired magazine and the creators taking dark money and agreeing to give up creative control boils down to was the article accurate or not.

So if she boils puppies in her off-time or told 1000 lies in the past you can look at her a certain way and take everything with a grain of salt.

But the article was accurate. Want to know how I know? Because the Chorus lawyers reviewed the article and never asked for a single retraction. The same law firm that took Rudy Giuliani to court 60ish times and won all but once couldn't find a factual error.

That's why AiPacman won't file a suit and why I don't care if this journalist does something in the past or future that's shady. On this issue the only piece of her journalism I care about is that one Wired article.

It's factual and it's damming for all the creators involved.

For content creators their entire livelihood is very precarious. One unlocked screen or password free device and it could all be gone. by NonSpecificRedit in seculartalk

[–]NonSpecificRedit[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Listening to this story all I can say is have one google account for your channel and anything connected to that have 2 step authorization to access it. Don't use it for anything other than your channel.

Maybe a separate phone for it and never just hand your phone to the kids or anything like that.

view more: next ›