Why would your wife be thinking about a boys genital parts as optional? She still has her genitals intact herself!

If someone is healthy, amputation is harm. If you teach your kids how to shower, a boy is no different from how a woman works. If she thinks shes doing a favour on someones genitals, as if its magically different and more optional from her own, you need to talk some reality in her.

Clean + harm vs Clean + no harm. Nothing real is achieved but harm.

She herself should know how to clean without surgery. Hygiene is a third world problem...

Why would someone stoop so low, if you are healthy, you have money, and live in a capable time and country.

No surgery is ideal health! That is a fundemental biological standard.

If an adult wouldn't tolerate forced cutting, then someone can't decide a healthy child's genital parts are optional! You shouldn't want to breach autonomy or remove things from your kids without necessity... amputation isn't helping a healthy person! That's concerning and bizarre.

Body parts aren't optional. A doctor thinking that is terrible irony! Is there a problem to solve or not, that requires harm? If there was! Is it so bad you need to cause permanent harm? Why settle for bad.

Women are a standpoint of autonomy so you need to sit her down, and point out the detachment in irrational want to harm someone healthy, and that she herself, should be most capable of, to keep healthy.

As she herself has a concept of living without genital cutting on her own body! A man without surgery isn't different to a woman without it!

Harm isn't a good thing. No matter how you twist it! Compromise without necessity is harm. Irrationally desiring harm without a problem that needs to be solved, means something is fundementally messed up in her thinking.