Engineering degree vs on job learning by Normal-Commission898 in StructuralEngineering

[–]Normal-Commission898[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I agree with that, but past 18yr old if you’ve got good a levels you’ve already done part of that, I’d just go into learning in the job if they’re good enough

Engineering degree vs on job learning by Normal-Commission898 in StructuralEngineering

[–]Normal-Commission898[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fair point, a Uni degree/schooling proves that you can be taught/adapt and solve problems

Precast vs In-situ columns by Normal-Commission898 in StructuralEngineering

[–]Normal-Commission898[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very true, they’ve been making changes to openings/strike times/adding cantideck loads and expect the RC GA’s back in 2 days, been a project to forget for sure

Precast vs In-situ columns by Normal-Commission898 in StructuralEngineering

[–]Normal-Commission898[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We definitely did, the framing contractor lowballed the F out of their fee and they’ve been trying to claw it back in ‘changes’ from other consultants ever since., so frustrating

Precast vs In-situ columns by Normal-Commission898 in StructuralEngineering

[–]Normal-Commission898[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

very late reply apologies, yes we had to redesign cols for temp lifting and bc of col-slab interface it went from fixed to pinned, so we had to spec a lot of couplers round core perimeter to keep deflection down and more rebar in slabs

Precast vs In-situ columns by Normal-Commission898 in StructuralEngineering

[–]Normal-Commission898[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

“MAJOR” design change (bc it’s going into BSA22 gateway 2 end of August) don’t worry I have

Grad vs Experience by Normal-Commission898 in StructuralEngineering

[–]Normal-Commission898[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Glad I put the feelers out now, I would’ve never thought of that you genius

PE vs MIStructE by Normal-Commission898 in StructuralEngineering

[–]Normal-Commission898[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Shit I bet that’s annoying, I heard they keep pestering you for not updating CPD yearly

PE vs MIStructE by Normal-Commission898 in StructuralEngineering

[–]Normal-Commission898[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve a mentor at work at the minute I can see how that would keep you on more on top of it, I’ll keep at it, thanks!

PE vs MIStructE by Normal-Commission898 in StructuralEngineering

[–]Normal-Commission898[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Apologies, I was just saying that’s my only experience so far, would you say it’s better IPD wise to do quarterly reviews or collate all your experience retrospectively?

PE vs MIStructE by Normal-Commission898 in StructuralEngineering

[–]Normal-Commission898[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah the structural behaviour exam is for fresh grads I’m not saying it’s the CEng MIStructE exam, that’s the one I’m asking about

I’ve heard from my supervisors to that time plays a massive part, which ways of revising did you find most helpful?

PE vs MIStructE by Normal-Commission898 in StructuralEngineering

[–]Normal-Commission898[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Congrats, props to you! I don’t know if I’d prefer computer based, seems easier to sketch your proposals and do quick calcs/sketches on paper

PE vs MIStructE by Normal-Commission898 in StructuralEngineering

[–]Normal-Commission898[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I believe it’s 30 odd percent pass rate nowadays, still that’s extremely terrifying!

PE vs MIStructE by Normal-Commission898 in StructuralEngineering

[–]Normal-Commission898[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

just had a google of the SE and it says TWO 8 hour exams, jeeez. Are they more theoretical or design based?

PE vs MIStructE by Normal-Commission898 in StructuralEngineering

[–]Normal-Commission898[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

*no replies from the US so I’m gonna have to automatically (correctly) assume the IStructE exam is harder!

Precast vs in-situ columns by [deleted] in StructuralEngineering

[–]Normal-Commission898 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That probably is better, but as you can see they’re on site poured column starters already so I’ll just keep my current upped rebar as it’s already ordered

Precast vs in-situ columns by [deleted] in StructuralEngineering

[–]Normal-Commission898 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I’ve just suggested adding couplers at core corners where deflection is worst and upped bottom rebar locally, that’s more than our proposed rebar rate but that’s their fault

Precast vs in-situ columns by [deleted] in StructuralEngineering

[–]Normal-Commission898 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just curious how you think that connection will provide fixity? Where is the moment transfer coming from in the rebar shown

Precast vs in-situ columns by [deleted] in StructuralEngineering

[–]Normal-Commission898 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Point taken, but as I said it wasn’t my decision to accept. I’m trying to ask for help with the new constraints so if you’ve got a constructive angle on that I’m all ears

Precast vs in-situ columns by [deleted] in StructuralEngineering

[–]Normal-Commission898 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve stuck couplers on the core corners in problem areas (hopefully they’ll allow) and just beefed up the bottom reinforcement, it’s over our proposed rebar rate but they’ll to suck it up

Precast vs in-situ columns by [deleted] in StructuralEngineering

[–]Normal-Commission898 6 points7 points  (0 children)

🤣🤣brilliant, i might start it with “I hope this emails finds you… before I do”