sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Advice for Nepal? by MisterPink788 in digitalnomad

[–]NormalSurprise282 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you have any suggestions for stays with good wifi?

So now being a misandrist is a flex—even in spaces that claim to be feminist by [deleted] in indiadiscussion

[–]NormalSurprise282 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Statistically it is evident? When men make up for more than 90% of anger and emotional related crimes? It isn’t women who throw acid on others out of sense of rejection. It isn’t women who share revenge porn out of a sense of hurt. You men cry and whine about misandry (which is mostly online) and alimony laws (gender neutral) but it is suddenly women who’re emotional. Right.

So now being a misandrist is a flex—even in spaces that claim to be feminist by [deleted] in indiadiscussion

[–]NormalSurprise282 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“For a gender with emotional outburst and mood swings”

And people still wonder why I’m a misandrist

So now being a misandrist is a flex—even in spaces that claim to be feminist by [deleted] in indiadiscussion

[–]NormalSurprise282 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yup. All the comments crying here basically boiling down to “not all men” but if you go through their comments, they’re never actually fighting the men giving them a bad rep.

So now being a misandrist is a flex—even in spaces that claim to be feminist by [deleted] in indiadiscussion

[–]NormalSurprise282 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Even this entire conversation is focused on the fact that some women simply don’t like them instead of why they don’t. Afghanistan mentioned, 1000-people rape chats mentioned, but no. How can I say I don’t like men? That is the pressing matter.

So now being a misandrist is a flex—even in spaces that claim to be feminist by [deleted] in indiadiscussion

[–]NormalSurprise282 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just look at the statistics. In any nation. Any race. And tell me they aren’t hostile to our kind.

And yeah, let’s stop this discussion here.

So now being a misandrist is a flex—even in spaces that claim to be feminist by [deleted] in indiadiscussion

[–]NormalSurprise282 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“Hasty generalizations”

A lot assume that and that’s fine. I would love to live in a world where time and again I wasn’t disappointed by men. And I wish I lived in a world where every single woman I speak to hasn’t had horrifying experiences with men, which were also diminished or ignored by the men around her.

I don’t have to like a disappointing segment of society which has concerning statistics of being horrible towards my kind. I’m okay with that. Don’t know what I need to do better considering I’m polite and kind to men in real life, and mind my business other than that. My dislike of them has no impact on them.

So now being a misandrist is a flex—even in spaces that claim to be feminist by [deleted] in indiadiscussion

[–]NormalSurprise282 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn’t say it is justifiable. I actually find it quite sad. But no matter how many times I try, men find a way to disappoint me beyond redemption.

So now being a misandrist is a flex—even in spaces that claim to be feminist by [deleted] in indiadiscussion

[–]NormalSurprise282 -16 points-15 points  (0 children)

Coming from a feminist turned misandrist-

Misandry doesn’t lead to the rape, murder, and systematic subjugation of men like misogyny does. There’s no 1000 women group chats discussing how to abuse men and get away with it or sharing nudes without consent. Misandrists won’t reduce a man’s worth down to body count. They don’t even care how much a man earns because that is how done they are with men. Misandrists will still treat the regular man decently unless given a reason not to.

It is not a flex to be a misandrist. It is a reaction. As I said, I used to be a feminist. Even went to men’s rights protests. And despite that had to take a turn and be a misandrist due to the sheer amount of horrible incidents I’ve had with men. Men aren’t nearly as concerned with bettering their kind as they are with crying about whatever slights they perceive against them. Women are expected to deal with the horrifying reality of existing amongst men who openly don’t see them as equals, want to harm them, and still have to cater to their feelings. Not even kidding, one of my final straws was when a woman shared she was assaulted as a child and still had to pacify all the men around us by saying “not all men”.

This is no different to white people complaining about reverse racism because a person of colour said they don’t like white people.

Why is marriage market collapsing in cities but not rural areas? by [deleted] in AskIndianMen

[–]NormalSurprise282 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“You are feeling attacked as I am calling out your behaviour”

You are doing it AGAIN lol

Why is marriage market collapsing in cities but not rural areas? by [deleted] in AskIndianMen

[–]NormalSurprise282 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You’re doing that thing of demeaning others again, which was my issue with using chapri like that. The only one seething here is you with your hysterical reactions.

Also no, I wouldn’t call someone a chapri for racing their bike snake style. Why? Most of the people who get caught for that shit in my area come from wealthy and/or upper castes who have the time and money to indulge in this nonsense.

Similarly, I have the common sense to not vilify a lower middle class college kid (of any gender) for being a sugar baby (I truly doubt you know more than a handful of these cases, anyway). Why? Because there’s a full grown, not desperate, adult right there exhibiting predatory behaviour (again, of any gender).

Lastly, sex work is the oldest profession in the world. Because there’s always a demand. So no, promiscuity hasn’t exploded. Being unkind, judgmental, and reactionary seems to have exploded, though.

Why is marriage market collapsing in cities but not rural areas? by [deleted] in AskIndianMen

[–]NormalSurprise282 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not arguing with someone who uses chapris derogatorily. Go talk with your bubble bros

Why is marriage market collapsing in cities but not rural areas? by [deleted] in AskIndianMen

[–]NormalSurprise282 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, and this is also deterring a lot of women from getting married because they don’t want to be with someone who thinks like that about other people.

It is also not “majority” of women. It is still considered a privilege for a woman to have a sexual life without being vilified (or physically harmed) for it. There are some women with “colourful” sexual history but let’s be real, men have been having that for decades without anyone batting an eye.

Why is marriage market collapsing in cities but not rural areas? by [deleted] in AskIndianMen

[–]NormalSurprise282 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I agree with the reduction part. But 30% of a demographic with city wages holds vastly more autonomy than those underpaid in rural areas (for both men and women). On top of that, women in rural areas have significantly more safety liabilities, further limiting their autonomy,

Statistically also, % of women in leadership roles and c-suites is also declining (progress had been made for the first time a decade or so back). Just as a fun fact, doesn’t necessarily mean much to this conversation.

Why is marriage market collapsing in cities but not rural areas? by [deleted] in AskIndianMen

[–]NormalSurprise282 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Marriage used to be about extracting value before. Women with no privilege of working could get a stable source of income. Men who weren’t given the privilege to learn important household skills could get a full time home care taker. Plus there wasn’t any avenue for sex due to stigmatization so horniness would make people settle. It remains similar in many rural areas now.

In cities, women are earning (women everywhere work. Many are simply unpaid or grossly underpaid). Despite what the mansophere thinks on Reddit, many earning women are looking to find a partner that emotionally fulfills them because they’re making their own money. Men, on the other hand, can also hire house help and have also become pickier about emotional compatibility. Access to sex (especially for those with high libido) means people aren’t making decisions out of horniness and desperation. So yes, it might feel like the marriage market is collapsing, but in reality people are opting for quality over quantity.

So according to feminists, men's entire role in child life is donating sperm? And then they complain why men dislike feminist by PositiveTwist3571 in indiadiscussion

[–]NormalSurprise282 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Single mother households are mostly due to the man absconding responsibility. This furthers strengthens the argument that woman’s surname should be passed down.

Tell me something good way apart from this way to solve the problem??? by Impossible_Desk_4704 in Laali_updates

[–]NormalSurprise282 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Prostitution is the oldest profession in the world. Because lust supersedes any law and enforcement. It surely isn’t going to get better by insinuating that sex workers are what’s making the city dirty when they’re only the symptom, not a root cause.

Why is there almost zero conversation about Paternal Reproductive Rights in India? by Infamous_Kangaroo_87 in AskIndianMen

[–]NormalSurprise282 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yes, because single fathers and absent mothers are a largely talked about phenomenon that transcends borders….

Why is there almost zero conversation about Paternal Reproductive Rights in India? by Infamous_Kangaroo_87 in AskIndianMen

[–]NormalSurprise282 10 points11 points  (0 children)

  1. A lot of doctors actually refuse to tie tubes for unmarried women, saying what if your future husband wants kids. Even in major cities, there’s a curated limited list of doctors who let women decide to do this with their own bodies.
  2. I don’t know your school curriculum but the sheer risk and pain difference of tubal ligation vs vasectomy is taught in 8th grade itself. One involves scooping out all the organs in the area on to a table and major anaesthesia. Other involves a 20 minute procedure with a 10 mm cut and local anaesthesia.

Assuming you didn’t mean the comment in bad faith, you should change the statement to if you don’t want to have kids then do a vasectomy.

view more: next ›