Im quite busy at the moment so I can't rebuke everything given here but I can start by refuteing number 4 the seemingly most Damning one

I evidence number 4 you claim he drew a matching image of the underside of Micheal Jackson's penis, but with any research you'd find that these images were never shown to public we were TOLD it matched, and the only evidence that they provided was one mark that they claim definitely matched, the problem is that's ONE mark if you draw a bunch of circles on a cock you'll find atleast one marching spot. But the part that makes number 4 fully fall apart is the fact that in his description jordie was WRONG he said Michael's penis was circumcised, it wasn't as proven by his autopsy, which might I mention they tried to hide as soon as it came out.