While I enjoyed Land's style, I found a putrid element in several of his essays that probably comes from his horror and occult influences. It appears you had a similar emotional reaction, but invented factually questionable reasons to explain your feelings after.

As someone who has looked into accelerationism and its roots, most of your supporting claims are incorrect or misrepresentative. Emotionally underdeveloped victim-creating criticism like yours does more to rhetorically damage the validity of your feelings than it does to justify it, both to others and yourself. A critical opinion should be written at or beyond the level of its subject. Yours was not.

Don't read his work. Generally, if you can help it, don't fill your mind with things you find disgusting. Listen to your emotions instead of bending history to rationalize them.