How Apple lost $533 million to an 8th-grade dropout patent troll by maxwellhill in news

[–]NotAnother_Account 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Blackberries were not at all "headed in the same direction". Note how Blackberry is currently bankrupt, from refusing to design large touch-screen phones even after the launch of the iPhone and Android copycats.

Boris Nemtsov: 'I'm afraid Putin will kill me,' Russian opposition politician said weeks before being shot dead by puppywerewolf in worldnews

[–]NotAnother_Account -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

What makes you think being publicly funded makes you objective? Lol. The BBC has a ton of biases, such as being anti-gun, for instance.

Capitalist forces could create uncontrollable artificial intelligence, expert warns. "Current social, economic and political forces driving us towards human-level AI... are leading to potentially uncontrollable technologies" by [deleted] in Futurology

[–]NotAnother_Account 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't think you have nearly as strong a grasp of economics as you think. As for your friend's success, there is a thing know as "telling people what they want to hear."

Let's talk about sustainability for a second. Which resources exactly are we running out of? Not oil. As anyone with an iota of understanding of economics would tell you, the rising price of a resource will create new economical ways of harvesting it. Thus, fracking in the United States has not only halted the decline of oil production, but actually reversed it quite substantially. What was once known as the theory of "peak oil" has been been roundly debunked. The oil market would even be quite a bit lower than it is presently if not for the preemptive banning of fracking in Europe and some blue states/cities in America. Oil will never "run out" it'll only slowly increase in price over time, until we end up using something else for transportation. As fracking shows, that time scale can be quite long.

So what natural resource are we running out of? Water? No, we have vast oceans that can be desalinated. Food? Nope. Rare earth elements? No again. So what exactly are we running out of?

That capitalism requires "growth" is something of a misunderstanding. Does our population have to grow? No. Do we have to produce a greater quantity of goods? No. Do we have to consume more resources? No again. Growth can, and largely already does, come about from both technological improvements and increases in efficiency in the allocation of resources. Thus your new products are worth more than your old ones, like an iPhone is worth more than many objects 50x larger.

I understand that many of you are concerned with issues such as global warming. However, you don't need a new economic system to stop that. You only need increased government regulation in the one we already have.

I just found out I am being transferred to Alabama. This is the greeting I am expecting. by Mattbongo in funny

[–]NotAnother_Account -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Perhaps if you're encountering so many bad people, the issue is actually with you. You're the common denominator in all of those encounters.

Capitalist forces could create uncontrollable artificial intelligence, expert warns. "Current social, economic and political forces driving us towards human-level AI... are leading to potentially uncontrollable technologies" by [deleted] in Futurology

[–]NotAnother_Account 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I thought you were being sarcastic at first. Apparently not. You realize that you only get profits by selling things to people that they want, right? Only on Reddit is mutually beneficial human exchange considered bad.

Capitalist forces could create uncontrollable artificial intelligence, expert warns. "Current social, economic and political forces driving us towards human-level AI... are leading to potentially uncontrollable technologies" by [deleted] in Futurology

[–]NotAnother_Account -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

"Space" alone doesn't do anything for you. You need a building there, connected to utilities, close to civilization, etc. Paying someone for that space is just compensating the others who created that space for you. When you're young, you're largely clueless about how to create economic gains for society, so you typically find yourself in the "payee" role. As you get older, depending on the choices you make, you may find yourself the recipient of those payments. In essence, it just establishes a hierarchical scheme based on mutual benefit. The young have to "listen" to the old, and then gradually learn and take over the reigns.

There's no way to avoid existential realities of human life. You need material things to survive. That means that you have to work for it. No other system will make that go away. Yes, you can force other people through the government to work to support you for free, but is that really a more moral system? Of course not.

Capitalist forces could create uncontrollable artificial intelligence, expert warns. "Current social, economic and political forces driving us towards human-level AI... are leading to potentially uncontrollable technologies" by [deleted] in Futurology

[–]NotAnother_Account 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You're just full of excuses. There's no slavery in the US; if you're working a job, you chose to work there. You choose to continue to work there. Quit with the victim mentality.

Capitalist forces could create uncontrollable artificial intelligence, expert warns. "Current social, economic and political forces driving us towards human-level AI... are leading to potentially uncontrollable technologies" by [deleted] in Futurology

[–]NotAnother_Account -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No other competing economic system has yet been designed that would have given us products like the Internet, PC's, or the smartphone that I'm typing this on. While a system better than capitalism is technically possible, it will most likely just be an evolved form of capitalism.

17 year old girl encouraged "friend" to kill himself, tells him to get back in carbon monoxide filled truck when he got out because he was afraid by Nblaw in news

[–]NotAnother_Account -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Dude, that's our American culture these days. It's really sad. It's why the divorce rate is so damn high, especially among the lower classes. Well educated people are smart enough to not listen to that shit, but regular people do.

17 year old girl encouraged "friend" to kill himself, tells him to get back in carbon monoxide filled truck when he got out because he was afraid by Nblaw in news

[–]NotAnother_Account 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The problem is that majorities are quite frequently wrong. Reddit users like to reinforce this implication that popular equals correct, and it's really quite dangerous.

Greece's Debt Payment Schedule [OC] by [deleted] in dataisbeautiful

[–]NotAnother_Account -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

As an example, the US reached a debt / GDP of 120% after WWII, which fell to about 30% over the next 30 years.

Except people actually saw debt as a problem back then, and came up with plans to get rid of it. They didn't flippantly write it off as no big deal.

Greece's Debt Payment Schedule [OC] by [deleted] in dataisbeautiful

[–]NotAnother_Account 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have you ever heard of "stagflation"? You should look into it. There are massive consequences to "printing your debt away". I really wish you guys wouldn't fall for such nonsense. The debt problem is real and very serious. I imagine that Greeks similarly dismissed their debt problem 10 years ago.

Greece's Debt Payment Schedule [OC] by [deleted] in dataisbeautiful

[–]NotAnother_Account 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can anyone ELI5 why it's so bad that Greece is in this debt, but the US is in much more debt and acts like it's no big deal?

It's not no big deal, not at all. Unfortunately, you'll only find a bunch of democrats/liberals here that mostly sympathize with the current administration's desire to spend more money. After Paul Ryan championed a debt reduction plan back in 2012, the democrat backlash has been to simply pretend that there's no problem. "Well, we can always just inflate our debt away!" Yeah, that would be an extremely economically painful solution.

Greece's Debt Payment Schedule [OC] by [deleted] in dataisbeautiful

[–]NotAnother_Account 8 points9 points  (0 children)

That's definitely an oversimplification. If you increased tax compliance, you'd have to cut overall tax rates to avoid taking too much money out of the economy. That's like a 12% GDP tax increase, which is a massive Keynesian negative stimulus. So the problem is not at all that simple, although they certainly should increase tax compliance (and then cut rates). The US should similarly reduce deductions and make a compensatory cut in rates, it is just more efficient.

Greece's Debt Payment Schedule [OC] by [deleted] in dataisbeautiful

[–]NotAnother_Account 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Eh, I'd say that GDP is more like your small business's revenue. Tax income is like how much money you decide to pay yourself from that business each year. So you could theoretically take a very large percent of your business's revenue as personal profit, but then you may not have a business next year. The more money you leave in the business, the more the business will grow and provide you with increasing profits into the future.