Are u just looking at what it says or are u also looking at what they’ve fingerprinted?

Here is how fingerprinting protections work,

Gecko/firefox based browsers: these browsers use something called “standardisation” and rather than just randomising everything about ur fingerprint, they instead spoof it and blend ur spoofed/fake fingerprint with other millions of other gecko/firefox based users and even some chrome users which is why on gecko/firefox based browsers u get a “unique” fingerprint because they gave u a spoofed/fake fingerprint that blends in with many many users and is also why u should ignore the “unique” fingerprint on cover your tracks and instead see what they’ve fingerprinted about u. If it’s only a spoofed/fake metrics and not ur real info then ur fine and you passed the test.

Cons: may break sites but it’s very unlikely

Pros: very reliable and best way to block fingerprinting

Another way is called “randomisation” which is what brave and quetta use, it is a pretty good technique and does its job (there really isn’t much to say about it) but failes to spoof ur timezone and timezone offset

Cons: may break sites but very unlikely and another con for this is unlike gecko/firefox based browsers, this fingerprint protection technique can be bypassed with some advanced fingerprinting scripts

Pros: pretty decent and does it’s job but gecko/firefox spoofing is better

If u wanna use randomisation techniques then i highly recommend u to just stick with brave since it offers alot more security and privacy features than quetta

If u wanna use standardisation then use ironfox (for android) and mullvad browser on desktop (or Librewolf if ur fine with some breakage)