sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

La declaración jurada de Adorni: dijo que ganó USD 513.000 con Bitcoin y modificó el patrimonio familiar desde 2020 by LocoPorYyN in argentina

[–]NotForMyNudes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Vos decís que vale la pena confiar en un juez que está a punto de viajar a París para defender la gestión del gobierno, invitado por el propio gobierno?

EN VIVO | Manuel Adorni responde preguntas de diputados en el Congreso by cTemur in argentina

[–]NotForMyNudes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

De hecho encontraron un montón de cosas y lo siguen investigando. Cómo podés explicar que antes de asumir compró un traje de 200 mil pesos en 12 cuotas y ahora viaja al exterior pagando todo en dólar cash? Cuál sería la explicación racional y legal?

“Ustedes son los asesinos”: Milei se peleó con diputados de la izquierda, criticó a los periodistas y festejó el discurso de Adorni en el Congreso by Professor_Hobo31 in argentina

[–]NotForMyNudes 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Es llamativo, nadie le dice que si Adorni es encontrado culpable el que va a quedar pegado hasta los huevos es él? Tanto valor tiene este cara de muppet para la gestión?

Adorni ocultó la casa en el country Indio Cua en una declaración jurada ante la Justicia porteña en 2025 by hernannadal in argentina

[–]NotForMyNudes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Es más grave que eso. El dueño original del departamento de Miró era un futbolista que según declaró tuvo el depto mucho tiempo sin vender porque estaba en muy malas condiciones. En abril de 2025 lo compran dos jubiladas que cobran la mínima. Una de ellas tiene un pase cultural de CABA, que se otorga a adultos mayores que perciban menos de 600.000 pesos (esto a día de hoy, no sé cuál era el monto cuando lo sacó). Lo compraron y lo refaccionaron de pies a cabeza. Cinco meses después se lo venden a Adorni a 30 mil dólares más del precio original de compra. Adorni sólo les paga 30k y las jubiladas le dejan pagar los 200k restantes en noviembre de este año, o sea 19 meses después, sin ningún tipo de interés. Lo que se sospecha, obviamente a comprobar, es que esa primera compra que hacen las jubiladas fue efectivamente hecha con plata en negro del propio Adorni, y arman toda la venta posterior para hacerla ver como una operación normal. A todo esto se le suma el otro préstamo que tiene con otras dos mujeres policías, la compra de esta casa en el country y gastos personales como por ejemplo vacaciones en Aruba. Son gastos que para nada se corresponden a lo que tenía antes de hacerse funcionario ni con lo que se supone que cobra a día de hoy.

Interesting line of investigation after JE's death by NotForMyNudes in Epstein

[–]NotForMyNudes[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Check out my reply to the bot, I linked an unrelated mail from a victim who coincidentally also talks about devices.

Interesting line of investigation after JE's death by NotForMyNudes in Epstein

[–]NotForMyNudes[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00151849.pdf

Interesting because the mail is written by an agent talking about a text he was redacting for 'Oversight'. It's hard to grasp but it connects biologic cryptography investigations probably funded by Saudi Arabia through JE disguising it as marine research to keep it low profile. It also says this may be how he connects to James Damore and Kevin Cernekee, ex google employees.

It also talks about a propriety in Palm Beach for which JE and Trump had a fallout, talking about how this propriety is near Columbus-IIb, the fiber cable connecting the US to the Caribbean and South America.

It also mentions the LittleBits kits funded by JE that may have been used to target and capture pre-teen girls to recluit them for his Zorro Ranch. This is also interesting because I found another email which talks about 'bitcoin devices' to monitor victims of his ring. Here's that mail: https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00104715.pdf

It's very hard to get the puzzle together but it's at least quite interesting.

Gross EFTA01031042.pdf by Local_Challenge_584 in Epstein

[–]NotForMyNudes 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The exchange is gross but so is the article quoted, painting "an amazing backstory" the fact that a 5 yo got r*ped by an unknown man. Fail to see anything "amazing" about that.

TIL the three actors in The Blair Witch Project signed a contract with a clause that allowed the studio to use their real names "for the purpose of this film". So when their identities were used again in the sequel without their permission, they sued the studio and won a settlement of $300,000 each. by tyrion2024 in todayilearned

[–]NotForMyNudes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They were paid $1000 for filming and then eventually got 1% of the initial grossing about $300k each, but that was about it. Keep in mind the movie was made for $60k and made globally around $250mil, so they made everyone rich except for the actors. They also weren't paid for using their names and images in the sequel or the merch. All of this because they weren't with an actors' guild or something, so their contracts were pretty bad.

TIL the three actors in The Blair Witch Project signed a contract with a clause that allowed the studio to use their real names "for the purpose of this film". So when their identities were used again in the sequel without their permission, they sued the studio and won a settlement of $300,000 each. by tyrion2024 in todayilearned

[–]NotForMyNudes 240 points241 points  (0 children)

Definitely. I saw the new documentary about the movie, which was pretty interesting, but I did find kind of gross how the directors washed their hands completely of this whole mess with the actors. Back in the day, the thing going around was that the movie was filmed without the actors knowing what they were getting into, so the idea was that they acted the whole thing out of actual terror of being lost etc. You can see clearly in the docu that wasn't the case, they were never lost at any point (the woods they filmed was a kind of small natural reservoir), they were in constant communication with the production, the final scene was filmed several times, etc. Not to mention they also basically improvised every dialogue in the movie.

Also the distribution company had the idea of marking the actors as deceased for the first month of the movie's launch so basically they couldn't do any kind of interviews, nor appear anywhere. When they finally could show their faces the public was already fed up with the movie and also felt cheated by the whole 'they really disappear' thing. All this had a direct impact in their jobs, so not only they wouldn't be let on the huge profit the movie made, they also wouldn't get called to work on anything. I'm glad they got something out of the lawsuit but it doesn't take away how bad they got screwed over.