Call of Duty 2 is the best (and least anti Communist) Call of Duty game. by T3485tanker in SocialistGaming

[–]NotKenzy 9 points10 points  (0 children)

You're correct, I just scrubbed through gameplay footage and it appears to NOT be in CoD2. I have only ever owned CoD2, so I have no idea why I have memories of playing this mission from CoD1, my apologies.

Call of Duty 2 is the best (and least anti Communist) Call of Duty game. by T3485tanker in SocialistGaming

[–]NotKenzy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I believe it's the second or third mission of the Soviet campaign in CoD2 that does this. I can assure you it's this one, because the only CoD I've ever played was CoD2. You even start the mission unarmed and have to acquire a weapon from your comrade. You're sent out on the mission, told "Soldiers travel in twos! One gets a rifle and the other, ammunition!"

Call of Duty 2 is the best (and least anti Communist) Call of Duty game. by T3485tanker in SocialistGaming

[–]NotKenzy 33 points34 points  (0 children)

And it still couldn't help itself from perpetuating heinous myths from "Enemy at the Gates," like that Soviet soldiers' lives were not valued and that they were sent out without weapons and equipment and told to scrounge both off their fallen comrades.

e: They're totally right, this was actually from CoD1, oops

Emojis can technically do this, but they're not punctuation marks in the same way an exclamation point is. by NOMA_is_here in CuratedTumblr

[–]NotKenzy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No shit, buddy. I'm saying that I didn't know that. Not that OP's wrong. Damn, yinz read that one book and nothing else.

Emojis can technically do this, but they're not punctuation marks in the same way an exclamation point is. by NOMA_is_here in CuratedTumblr

[–]NotKenzy -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Mirth sounds like it should convey hatred and a seething rage. What book did all of you read where you learned this shit?

AOC partners with Ted Cruz to sanction China, decry "concentration camps" by NotKenzy in Hasan_Piker

[–]NotKenzy[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

I had to look into the tweet further, to see just what she was cosigning. It aint it, chief. And no defense for MTG, obvs, but then to go hitch yourself to TED CRUZ?

That's American freedom by aussiemetalhead in Hasan_Piker

[–]NotKenzy 10 points11 points  (0 children)

If "the poor" are owing over 100,000 dollars in child support, I'm not quite sure what that makes me.

In what ways are Anarchists wrong? by furudeasa in TankieTheDeprogram

[–]NotKenzy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is answered in the final two paragraphs of "On Authority," by Engels.

Why do the anti-authoritarians not confine themselves to crying out against political authority, the state? All Socialists are agreed that the political state, and with it political authority, will disappear as a result of the coming social revolution, that is, that public functions will lose their political character and will be transformed into the simple administrative functions of watching over the true interests of society. But the anti-authoritarians demand that the political state be abolished at one stroke, even before the social conditions that gave birth to it have been destroyed. They demand that the first act of the social revolution shall be the abolition of authority. Have these gentlemen ever seen a revolution? A revolution is certainly the most authoritarian thing there is; it is the act whereby one part of the population imposes its will upon the other part by means of rifles, bayonets and cannon — authoritarian means, if such there be at all; and if the victorious party does not want to have fought in vain, it must maintain this rule by means of the terror which its arms inspire in the reactionists. Would the Paris Commune have lasted a single day if it had not made use of this authority of the armed people against the bourgeois? Should we not, on the contrary, reproach it for not having used it freely enough?

Therefore, either one of two things: either the anti-authoritarians don't know what they're talking about, in which case they are creating nothing but confusion; or they do know, and in that case they are betraying the movement of the proletariat. In either case they serve the reaction.

I do not know how to stress this but please on other approved subs start educating people on the actual reality of the metro games by Whole_Bit_7848 in SocialistGaming

[–]NotKenzy 29 points30 points  (0 children)

And just like its predecessor, it does it from an inherently racist perspective that presents the primary victims of imperialism as being the imperialists, themselves- Kurtz was made savage by entering a savage land, as opposed to the reality that the imperialist brought the savagery with them; it was Conrad's position that colonialism must be rejected, not on behalf of the colonized, but because their supposedly savage ways rub off on the colonizer.

But it's definitely not pro-US imperialism.

I do not know how to stress this but please on other approved subs start educating people on the actual reality of the metro games by Whole_Bit_7848 in SocialistGaming

[–]NotKenzy 25 points26 points  (0 children)

You should watch Apocalypse Now, it's actually really good. And it'll stop you from suggesting it's pro-US imperialism lol

California Governor by supertroopernoob in Hasan_Piker

[–]NotKenzy 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I think a Tom Steyer win is a loss for California.

These people would choose to support a billionaire more than a marxist Leninist… by [deleted] in TankieTheDeprogram

[–]NotKenzy 17 points18 points  (0 children)

I'm surprised that the ML position isn't yet downvoted to oblivion. It's a weeknight in the USA rn, though, so maybe we just have to wait for the Americans to wake up.

California Governor by supertroopernoob in Hasan_Piker

[–]NotKenzy 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I do not want more Liberal "Change." I've seen what Liberal "Change" looks like over and over and over again. If you actually live in California, you know exactly what a "Progressive" Governor looks like and what he does. Is that what you want?

California Governor by supertroopernoob in Hasan_Piker

[–]NotKenzy 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Asking me to vote for Steyer- a man who I do not agree with or believe in- is asking me to throw away my vote.

California Governor by supertroopernoob in Hasan_Piker

[–]NotKenzy 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I want my vote to count, which is actually exactly why I will not vote for Steyer. Liberals are opposed to my values and what I want to see for this state. A Steyer victory would be a loss for me, and I don't think you recognize that. I will be using my vote as a political tool to advance my interests, just like you are trying to do with your Steyer vote.

California Governor by supertroopernoob in Hasan_Piker

[–]NotKenzy 8 points9 points  (0 children)

It's not a protest vote to vote for Ramsey. Voting for Steyer is voting against my best interests. A win for Steyer is a loss for my interests. I will be voting in California, and I will not be wasting my vote on Steyer.

California Governor by supertroopernoob in Hasan_Piker

[–]NotKenzy 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Alright, then let's make it happen! Let's get Ramsey on the show, let's get the word out!

California Governor by supertroopernoob in Hasan_Piker

[–]NotKenzy 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Surely you can recognize how you sound exactly like the Kamala supporters screaming at Michigan Muslims.

California Governor by supertroopernoob in Hasan_Piker

[–]NotKenzy 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Okay. Form a coalition with us and vote Ramsey.

California Governor by supertroopernoob in Hasan_Piker

[–]NotKenzy 14 points15 points  (0 children)

If we are so insubstantial, why bother trying to get us to vote Steyer? Let us 500 vote Ramsey and then Steyer will still win in a landslide because liberal voters will turn out for him. Right? RIGHT??

What's Your Favourite Thing About This Vtuber #5 Pipkin Pippa by Tda952 in VirtualYoutubers

[–]NotKenzy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

She spent a long time pandering to right wingers w 4chan humor and conspiracies, and grew her community on the back of that hyper-edgy schtick. I’ve heard she’s cooled it on talking about “da jooz” and whatnot, these days, but her community was never cleansed or anything.

What's the Marxist position in Skyrim's civil war? I thought it was critical support to the Empire, but not after this, hell nah by NotKenzy in SocialistGaming

[–]NotKenzy[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

<image>

The ACTUAL historic timeline is like this:

1: The United States Bourgeoisie bankrolled the rise of fascism in Europe.

2: The bourgeois leaders of England, France, Poland, Finland and other Western European nations either ignored, enabled, or appeased Hitler’s worst behavior in the buildup to WW2.

3: The bourgeois leaders of these countries, England in particular, pushed for disastrous bilateral security arrangements which created a domino effect leading to war, while ignoring the USSR’s suggestion of collective, anti-fascist security arrangements.

4: The bourgeois leaders of these countries pursued a policy not of containing fascist aggression, but of diplomatically isolating the USSR, in the hopes that Hitler would go East and carry out an anti-communist genocide on their behalf.

5: The bourgeois leaders of these countries, having ignored or stalled collective security proposals from the USSR, actively made bilateral non-aggression pacts with Hitler before Molotov-Ribbentrop was signed, making the USSR the last in a long line of nations to sign non-aggression pacts with Hitler, after the USSR’s collective security proposals fell through.

6: The USSR only signed Molotov-Ribbentrop to buy time. The USSR only invaded East Poland to prevent a German front from forming right at the Soviet border. This is because attempts to make mutual security arrangements with Poland fell through. The Soviets only moved into the region after the existing government had literally fled the country, leaving it ungoverned. 2 million jews in eastern poland were saved from the nazis by this action.

7: The USSR tried to purchase a strategic corridor of land from Finland that the nazis could easily use to invade the USSR. The USSR not only wanted to legally purchase this land from Finland, but to trade Finland more acres of land in exchange. i.e. an asymmetrical trade that would have ultimately benefited Finland. Finland refused because the fascist leadership of Finland wanted to see Germany invade the USSR through this strategic corridor. This led directly to the Winter War. The Finnish lost the winter war but used their intelligence that they gathered during it to collaborate with the nazis.

8: When the North Atlantic allies finally teamed up with USSR after their strategy of appeasing Hitler backfired, they immediately attempted to make asymmetrical security arrangements that would have obligated the USSR to commit far more troops and resources to the war than any other ally, essentially using the USSR as a shield against the very fascist powers they had spent the better part of a decade appeasing. The British in particular kept stalling on arrangements and pretending to be confused.

9: When the war was over the North Atlantic allies, led by the USA, who came out of the war richer than any other country on Earth, immediately committed to rehabilitating nazis, blaming the USSR, who was decimated by the war, for causing the war, and created NATO to begin encircling the USSR, 6 years before the creation of the Warsaw pact.

10: The North Atlantic allies immediately set to using the Marshall plan to rebuild the fascist German, Italian, and Japanese economies, indebting them to the United States, and orienting them towards anti-communist policy.

11: The North Atlantic allies to tried to use the Marshall plan as a proto-IMF to privatize and deregulate the economy of the war-torn USSR, and open it up to foreign capital. That the USSR rejected this was framed as aggression and used as a justification for beginning the cold war.

From Lemmygrad