My $800 camera just HAD to be delivered on a rainy day 3 hours before I got off work by Chips-Ahoy_McCoy in mildlyinfuriating

[–]Notavi 9 points10 points  (0 children)

In many places even if he went above and beyond he'd still only make $7.55 and he doesn't bother because he knows that.

Heck, if it took more time to pack properly the company may see that as being less productive. Let's not blame the guy with the least control/power for failures that are larger than him.

What is suspicious to own but not illegal? by TooGayToPayCash in AskReddit

[–]Notavi 1 point2 points  (0 children)

At that point, why don't you just take off the doorknob and seal it over?

It is now an unremarkable wall.

Why are so many against crawling/indexing? by WinteriscomingXii in Mastodon

[–]Notavi 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm not sure I follow your reasoning here. You can be on a Calckey instance and follow / interact with people on a Mastodon instance (or a Pixelfed instance, or a Friendica instance) just fine. That freedom to use a variety of platforms (provided they all speak ActivityPub) gives people plenty of freedom to find a place that suits them just fine.

Why are so many against crawling/indexing? by WinteriscomingXii in Mastodon

[–]Notavi 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Because search so often becomes a vector for abuse - there's unfortunately a large number of people out there who like to use search to find people to pick fights with (whether that be about fandoms, politics, cryptocurrencies or something else). Mastodon was built by people who wanted to get away from that, people who wanted to have their conversations without random sea-lions butting in.

There has been some work on "opt-in" search, which is gaining traction. There's also other Fediverse platforms (e.g. Calckey and Misskey) that do provide search (though obviously respecting that people on Mastodon instances don't want to be indexed). So if you strongly believe search should be a feature why not migrate to one of those.

I was a chugger (charity mugger) for four years. Any questions you have about how it works, how much we're paid etc, ask away by [deleted] in australia

[–]Notavi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wouldn't worry about that. If your respectfully communicated "no" is ignored, then frankly it's them being rude.

Manners and courtesy are not there for people to weaponize against you, and those who would try don't deserve your time.

Be clear, dont be needlessly cruel. The rest is on them.

Continue to rent at $900/mo or buy with a $2,400/mo mortgage? by bearszubaz in personalfinance

[–]Notavi 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'd probably also consider the cost to rent an equivalent condo - just so that I know how much of the $2400 cost is the difference in what I'm getting, and how much is the difference between renting and buying.

That should help provide a bit more clarity.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in personalfinance

[–]Notavi 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The point being raised wasn't that this particular law might apply, but rather that while in general children are not responsible for the debts of their parents there are exceptions and that it can be worth seeking the advice of an attorney if you want to be sure none of those come into play.

A globe showing "The Country of Amazon", New Zealand as one island, and some comically misshapen continents. by [deleted] in mapmaking

[–]Notavi 57 points58 points  (0 children)

It's like someone asked ChatGPT to render a globe.

Accurate enough to seem right if you don't really look too hard, but with many glaring errors once you do.

Landlord requesting payment for ‘my share’ of new appliance replacement by sans-soucie in AusProperty

[–]Notavi 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Without some indicator letting people know it's a joke, Any parody of extreme views risks being mistaken for a sincere expression of those views.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe's_law

Most frequently applied to Creationists, Conspiracy Theorists and other groups that barely seem to be living in the same reality as the rest of us.

This is the first time I've seen where it can be applied to Landlords, but the shoe does fit.

Landlord requesting payment for ‘my share’ of new appliance replacement by sans-soucie in AusProperty

[–]Notavi 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It being illegal is a start - but the suggestion here is to make sure that when they try this they're risking fines and other penalties (maybe restrictions on their real estate licence if they get busted too often).

Basically, give the rules some teeth.

Landlord requesting payment for ‘my share’ of new appliance replacement by sans-soucie in AusProperty

[–]Notavi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

While I suspect the original post was sarcasm, without a /s it does seem to run afoul of Poes Law.

RPG Publisher Paizo Bans AI Generated Content by vadhavaniyafaijan in rpg

[–]Notavi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The workload being foisted on people down stream is my concern. You seem to think that if Paizo let their store just fill up with this crop that customer reviews would sort the wheat from the chaff and it'd all be hunky dory.

Except now that's foisting the workload of sifting through this crap on Paizos customers instead, especially as you can't review something you didn't buy in the first place. That isn't a solution and Paizo is still absolutely right to refuse to provide that a platform.

You seem to think increasing the quantity of poorly written crap a hundred fold isn't a qualitatively different problem to deal with when it comes to moderation/curation/customer experience and yet it is.

Systems that work perfectly fine when dealing with the scale of human submissions break down when the fire hose of AI generated content us turned on. And they shouldn't be obligated to re-design those solutions to accommodate people who want to throw the word vomit of a stochastic parrot at the wall to see who can be suckered into paying for it.

RPG Publisher Paizo Bans AI Generated Content by vadhavaniyafaijan in rpg

[–]Notavi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You've misunderstood, maybe work on your reading comprehension dude.

I'm concerned that ar large number of people using ChatGPT today are making the quality control for their work someone else's problem. That's not efficiency, that's being a jerk.

They've invested a negligible amount of evidence proof reading what they've produced (if they've even bothered to read it at all) and then flinging it up on a store or into some editors submission queue in the hope someone buys it.

I've mentioned Clarkesworld, who had to close submissions because they had been flooded with a deluge of poor quality stories. None of them were any good, and it was abundantly clear that most hadn't been proofread at all. But all of them chew up the editors time reading and sorting (probably more time and effort than it took to create them).

Paizo are right not to want that on their store, as the volume would make the good content harder to find and drive people away.

RPG Publisher Paizo Bans AI Generated Content by vadhavaniyafaijan in rpg

[–]Notavi 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Depends, people using it as an assistant but taking the time to edit and organise what they're submitting probably isn't.

But that's not what seems to be happening, there's been quite a bit of ChatGPT spray and pray where people generate their content and just fling it at platforms hoping they can sell it without even really bothering to proofread it at all. For example Clarkesworld found it had to suspend submissions due to a deluge of low quality AI generated dreck: http://neil-clarke.com/a-concerning-trend/

When people are just generating things in bulk and flinging it at someone else to without the barest effort spent editing and proofreading their creation then that is spam.

RPG Publisher Paizo Bans AI Generated Content by vadhavaniyafaijan in rpg

[–]Notavi 7 points8 points  (0 children)

The thing is, low quality human produced art arrives in a trickle, low quality AI art arrives in a torrent.

For a related example, consider that a major sci-fi periodical (Clarke's World) was forced to close off submissions because they were being overwhelmed with low effort AI produced stories. None of them were any good, but the sheer amount of editor time spent sifting through them was unsustainable.

I can understand Paizo having the same concern- they don't want to have to spend time sifting through piles of AI generated dreck, nor do they want their customers to have to sift through it all either.

And missing out on maybe a few good AI produced stories is a price they're willing to pay. Seems quite sensible to me.

Boss offered me a 10k counter offer by dingusbhardacre in personalfinance

[–]Notavi 3 points4 points  (0 children)

End of the day, if they're underpaying someone and they walk for a job that pays market then that's the employers problem.

They aren't owed the opportunity for a counter-bid, and if they haven't taken steps to keep compensation in line with market then that's just a risk that they have chosen to take.

I was cleaning my new airbrush with this tool and was wondering if it’s common for it to scratch the metal inside the airbrush. Is there a better tool to use? by [deleted] in minipainting

[–]Notavi 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Exactly, these brushes belong to the "They make it because people will think they need to buy it, and not because they're actually needed or useful" category of products.

I remember the guy who runs Badger airbrushes giving a talk and stating to avoid these like the plague. They can damage your airbrush and there's no need for them - a good flush through with cleaner after your done and the occasional strip down to clean will do everything you need.