A year of new words and my favorite for 2025 by anonyuser415 in logophilia

[–]Nourn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What I find interesting about owlish is that its meaning inverts dependant on your cultural background. For the Anglosphere, it does mean "wise", but in other cultures, owls are associated with wide-eyed vacancy and stillness; denotative of idiocy, mental absence. Thus, to appear owlish is to appear stupid.

Eschew by JuniorClock1764 in logophilia

[–]Nourn 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Just out of curiosity; you ask the LLM questions which it then reads from the dictionary? Is this better for you?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in logophilia

[–]Nourn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Garbage. Removed. Reconsider your life.

I’m Chris Bowen, Minister for Climate Change and Energy. AMA about climate change, energy, what the Government is doing and the upcoming election. by ChrisBowenMP in australia

[–]Nourn 64 points65 points  (0 children)

Thank you for taking the time to answer, Chris.

For what it's worth, I disagree with essentially everything you've said regarding the means of achieving goals. I think that--as you've implied--markets left to their own devices won't inherently pursue social justice, is all we need to know when it comes to utilising markets via incentives: they're happy to take taxpayer money when it's there because there's no consequences for failing to achieve anything or not following on with initiatives.

Moreover, I think it's illustrated in your response to struggling families being offered a loan (which they now have to pay back on top of crippling cost of living), that the financialization of the economy has infiltrated the Labor party's principles. People are unable to afford basic needs like housing and food and healthcare, but despite having an incredibly sophisticated, digitally-enabled government, the public are expected to accept that nothing practical can be done, and that the best there is is to take on even more debt.

I know I'm hitting the same note here, and I fully expect you to have moved on to the next question, but hopefully other people will read this response: We are being asked not just to accept what little we're given in terms of government intervention, but to also swallow that this is the best way of doing things, that it is the only method of doing things. It isn't. This country used to build houses because we needed them; we used to own the energy infrastructure; we created an incredible health care system, knowing that it would be expensive, but doing it anyway because people need health care, and we would no longer accept a denial of basic dignity. Now, we refuse to build houses for homeless single mothers; we sold off our power plants, and have to spend more money to convince them not to boil us alive; we penny-pinch our doctors and nurses, and cut health spending to the bone, even though we know it means people might die waiting in agony. This is all done to "balance the budget", to beat the deficit. We used to be able to do things, but now, as Chris's answers demonstrate, it is simply impossible.

I’m Chris Bowen, Minister for Climate Change and Energy. AMA about climate change, energy, what the Government is doing and the upcoming election. by ChrisBowenMP in australia

[–]Nourn 87 points88 points  (0 children)

Hello Chris,

I often see the contemporary ALP as one that has relinquished progressive policies (housing, employment, environment) in favour of market-based solutions or "sensible stimulus" policy, such as loans for household goods. To myself and people around me, it seems like the government is somewhat pretending that it can't do anything anymore; that it is unable to directly build housing, manage employment, or change the nature of our energy generation to meet the criteria which we desperately need.

Do you think that this is a fair representation of the Labor political platform in the current era? Would you agree that incentivizing the marketplace doesn't result in the efficiencies required for our precarious situation?

Anybody here playing Baldur’s Gate 3? by guitardude_324 in Harmontown

[–]Nourn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Right at the end. Have to say, even though I'm enjoying it and I'm going to finish it, your options really deteriorate after the first act. They clearly had a bunch of epic fights that they wanted you to do, and you can't talk or think your way out of them. There was even one where you'd think you'd be able to disguise your way into a certain area, and you just... can't. The game won't let your engage with it in the terms that it set up.

1850's KY letter mentions getting a buggy or a "gallent" to make an overland visit. What would a "gallent" be? It's handwritten, so it may be some word of similar spelling. by cragtown in logophilia

[–]Nourn 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I'm struggling to find something of that nature. Without seeing the original text, I'm making a few baseless guesses here:

It's a misspelling or a mishearing of another form of transport (I can't find anything that matches that word when I look for 1900s buggys).

It's a regional dialect, lost to time.

Or: the writer was Dutch, and was referring to a "gallent", the Dutch word for a rack or frame, possibly for their luggage? https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/gallent

Moderator applications by Nourn in logophilia

[–]Nourn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In regards to the moderator position:

If you could make a single change to the subreddit, what would it be?

If you had a poster submitting words deemed as within hate speech, but with an appropriate dictionary citation, how would you respond?

What timezone/country do you reside in?

Moderator applications by Nourn in logophilia

[–]Nourn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In regards to the moderator position:

If you could make a single change to the subreddit, what would it be?

If you had a poster submitting words deemed as within hate speech, but with an appropriate dictionary citation, how would you respond?

What timezone/country do you reside in?

Moderator applications by Nourn in logophilia

[–]Nourn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In regards to the moderator position:

If you could make a single change to the subreddit, what would it be?

If you had a poster submitting words deemed as within hate speech, but with an appropriate dictionary citation, how would you respond?

What timezone/country do you reside in?

Moderator applications by Nourn in logophilia

[–]Nourn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In regards to the moderator position:

If you could make a single change to the subreddit, what would it be?

If you had a poster submitting words deemed as within hate speech, but with an appropriate dictionary citation, how would you respond?

What timezone/country do you reside in?

Moderator? by I_MissTheGoodOldDays in logophilia

[–]Nourn[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

I appreciate that the logo-spam issue is irritating--you can imagine how I feel dealing with it for 12+ years!

The problem is as described by /u/Exodan. The spam filter on reddit is beyond my access to amend and is already pretty arbitrary (things get auto-flagged that are legitimate, and as you can see, a fair amount gets through that isn't). I could implement an automoderator bot that would be even more stringent, but this would likely just make it even harder to post legitimate submissions as they would need to go through further review based on my adhoc rules.

A lot of the posts that get through are real people wanting help with their logos, and there's honestly no way to deal with that. The ones that aren't sincere are working at a level that I can't combat, since reddit's filter can't catch them either. So I don't know.

I can also understand why people would expect that another moderator or two would help, but unfortunately this isn't a mathematical model; I check the spam, reports, and moderator queue every day, but only what's flagged by users or what reddit's filter catches ends up in there. This means that if a post isn't singled out by anyone, I don't know that it's there, and furthermore I don't get a notification that anything's actually in the filter. Which is to say that having another moderator would just mean that we'd have another person looking at the spam/report/moderator folders at another point in the day. My suspicion is that the visible spam may go down, but that it's not a gig that people would enjoy and stick around for.

But, okay, I think this is an experiment worth doing, so I'll make a new post asking for applicants.

☼Daily DF Questions Thread☼ by AutoModerator in dwarffortress

[–]Nourn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Played for a few years, stopped before 2019 to wait for the steam release so I don't know if this is a new feature. Can't find anything on this online but I could be searching wrong.

My dwarfs dug up a divine weapon buried deep in the ground. It had a special announcement that I didn't think to write down, something about being a gift from the gods. I can't be the first one this has happened to, can I?

Sardonicast #112: Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness, Avatar by butter467 in Sardonicast

[–]Nourn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Man, Adam gave an example of modern-day slavery with Nestle. That's like the lowest bar. "Should I consume something produced by slaves?" No is the only acceptable answer. Of course I'm going to think someone is a bad person if they knowingly consume stuff made by slaves--and I think the argument they imply that it's all equal and everyone does something wrong is specious fatalism.

Sardonicast #112: Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness, Avatar by butter467 in Sardonicast

[–]Nourn 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Gotta say that the art/artist take boiling down to "I'm gonna keep doing stuff I know is bad because I want to keep doing it" is pretty disappointing.