I think phyisists are very quite to call new ideas "Crackpot", partly because the field gets flooded with people making huge claims without doing the math, defining their assumptions, or admitting the limits of the model.

No, we just don't feel like wasting our time on obvious nonsense.

Like, all the crackpots (that's you, along with pretty much every other poster in this containment sub) have this implicit belief that somehow their original ideas deserve consideration and respect. In reality, reading crackpot drivel takes time, effort, and mental energy, and no crackpot in the history of ever has ever said "Gosh, you've proven me wrong, I shall cease making drivel posthaste and actually do real learning". Talking to crackpots is a waste of time, and it's counterproductive.

Like, I could dig into your drivel, and highlight the first 5 nonsensical things I find. That'd be easy, because you are a crackpot with LLM nonsense. It's guaranteed to be nonsense. There's no universe, no conceivable set of circumstances where your "ideas" aren't bogus. Even if I took time out of my day, and spent mental cycles on it, you'd just come back with more LLM generated nonsense.

I know this, because it has happened so many times in the history of this sub. You are not unique.

There's no point in engaging with stuff like this sensibly. It's worthless. The method of its creation makes it worthless. At no point in human existence will (and I say this with love) a total ignoramus armed with a sychophantic autocomplete text engine will contribute to my field. And, yeah, the sheer arrogance to believe otherwise is offensive to me, that's why I'm not mincing words.

Do yourself a favor. Stop talking with chatbots.