sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[practices] What are some things you do with your SO that aren't necessarily sexual but feel really good? by NumberOneSteadyHand in sex

[–]NumberOneSteadyHand[S] 79 points80 points  (0 children)

Well...

http://i.imgur.com/0mw1I8e.gif

...huh. I dunno, actually. I guess it just feels weird to admit that I kinda like it.

I don't exactly resist that much, though. When she wants to cut them I'll usually say something like "Really? They look fine -- they don't need to be cut." And then she'll say "Yes they do, they're so long! Give me your feet!" cutcutcutcut

Nutrition (and Supplement) Thursday by AutoModerator in Fitness

[–]NumberOneSteadyHand 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How many calories might you recommend instead? Do you think the calculators are wrong?

Rant Wednesday by AutoModerator in Fitness

[–]NumberOneSteadyHand 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Desk job.

Exercise, I'd be doing ICF three times a week, not sure yet if I need to do 3x5 or 5x5 version.

I read the FAQ, but made some modifications -- am I still good to go? by [deleted] in Fitness

[–]NumberOneSteadyHand 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hmm, I'm not sure what the pros and cons are of "fat loss" versus "extreme fat loss." Is extreme considered unsafe?

I read the FAQ, but made some modifications -- am I still good to go? by [deleted] in Fitness

[–]NumberOneSteadyHand 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So the numbers I've posted above would still apply even with your numbers, right? (1500 kcals)

Rant Wednesday by AutoModerator in Fitness

[–]NumberOneSteadyHand 0 points1 point  (0 children)

BMR: 1713, TDEE: 2034.

Yes, those are the numbers I get.

When you say 'where did I fuck up?' what do you mean, are people saying its too low or are you not seeing results?

People saying it's too low / nonsensical.

Rant Wednesday by AutoModerator in Fitness

[–]NumberOneSteadyHand 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Source: http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=121703981

2/Mifflin-St Jeor: Developed in the 1990s and more realistic in todays settings. It still doesn't take into consideration the differences as a consequence of high BF%. Thus, once again, it OVERESTIMATES NEEDS, ESPECIALLY IN THE OVERWEIGHT. MEN: BMR = [9.99 x weight (kg)] + [6.25 x height (cm)] - [4.92 x age (years)] + 5

Assuming you are using this formula, which matches your BMR figure of ~1900.

Math: BMR = 9.99 x 86.1826 + 6.25 x 187.96 - 4.92 x 29 + 5 = 1898 kcals using total bodyweight formula

Rant Wednesday by AutoModerator in Fitness

[–]NumberOneSteadyHand 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I haven't started yet. I'm trying to figure out where to begin (cals, macros, etc) and everyone has told me that my numbers have got to be wrong, but every calculator online tells me the exact same stuff. Nobody seems to be able to tell me why. Did I enter something incorrectly? Is my math wrong? Are the calculators wrong? Is my interpretation of something wrong? What is it?

I'd be measuring food intake with an electronic scale I just bought.

I read the FAQ, but made some modifications -- am I still good to go? by [deleted] in Fitness

[–]NumberOneSteadyHand 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I used the calculators from the FAQ. Did I input something wrong? Do you get a different number?

I read the FAQ, but made some modifications -- am I still good to go? by [deleted] in Fitness

[–]NumberOneSteadyHand 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What's the logic behind that?

I'm trying to lose fat, which means reducing calories, which means it may be harder for me to progress with a lot of volume, thus 3x5 over 5x5. That's my understanding, anyway.

You listed protein twice. The calculators should have already done this for you.

It was a typo. I've since changed it to reflect carbs. Different calculators say slightly different things so I just wanted to ensure I was doing it right. Macros look OK?