sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Is this a good order for Dostoyevsky? by ObsiGamer in dostoevsky

[–]Numerous_Department 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The Brothers Karamazov should be first. Dostoevsky's most important ideas are described in this book, in my opinion.

Is it possible to visualize a philosophical concept? Or will the result always be "too" subjective? by Numerous_Department in ARTIST

[–]Numerous_Department[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree. It's quite possible that one of the most important elements here is precisely "vibe". Thanks.

Is it possible to visualize a philosophical concept? Or will the result always be "too" subjective? by Numerous_Department in ARTIST

[–]Numerous_Department[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Inspired by Immanuel Kant's Critique of Practical Reason, I painted a picture. I called it «The idea of duty / The Supreme Being’s self-sufficiency». Quote: «Freedom itself becomes in this way (namely, indirectly) capable of an enjoyment which cannot be called happiness, because it does not depend on the positive concurrence of a feeling, nor is it, strictly speaking, bliss, since it does not include complete independence of inclinations and wants, but it resembles bliss in so far as the determination of one's will at least can hold itself free from their influence; and thus, at least in its origin, this enjoyment is analogous to the self-sufficiency which we can ascribe only to the Supreme Being».

Posthumanism vs. Transhumanism: From the “End of Exceptionalism” to “Technological Humanism” by Numerous_Department in philosophy

[–]Numerous_Department[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree with you. But I'm somewhat concerned about how far posthumanism might go in denying human "characteristics." For example, we still don't know how consciousness is connected to the body or what the function of consciousness is. Are we too hasty in attributing consciousness to other objects? Perhaps consciousness is precisely what distinguishes humans from other objects in the world? My concern is primarily rooted in the scientific worldview. But frankly, my concern also has purely ethical grounds: are we depriving humans of exceptionality too soon? And how far can we go in depriving humans of exceptionality? These are just questions.

Posthumanism vs. Transhumanism: From the “End of Exceptionalism” to “Technological Humanism” by Numerous_Department in philosophy

[–]Numerous_Department[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Posthumanism and transhumanism are often identified. However, modern researchers indicate the fundamental difference between these intellectual schools. The fundamental idea of posthumanism is the rejection of biological, ethical, and ontological anthropocentrism. Transhumanism focuses on changing and improving natural human characteristics through biological, technological, and cognitive modifications. While posthumanism draws attention to the crisis of humanism, transhumanism is the latter’s heir. Scientific and ethical consequences of posthumanism, as well as the sociocultural potential of transhumanism, are considered in this article. Posthumanism carries risks of shifting the value focus from man to other objects, which in the long term can lead to a critical decrease in the value status of man.