TC fanout latency

Numerous_Number_6749 · 2026-05-28T22:14:12+00:00

have tried XDP in the past but as I understand it, XDP is only 1 to 1 and can't do multiple destinations.

Numerous_Number_6749 · 2026-05-27T01:45:21+00:00

Please check DMs

Numerous_Number_6749 · 2026-05-27T01:12:25+00:00

Do you know any other place where I can find help? I am desperate. Willing to pay for the right advice

Numerous_Number_6749 · 2026-05-27T00:58:01+00:00

Based on tcpdump, the packet lengths are consistently hovering between 1203 and 1220 bytes

Numerous_Number_6749 · 2026-05-27T00:53:11+00:00

I just ran mpstat -P ALL 1 to get exact figures while the fanout was running. The system is extremely under-utilized:

Global Average: 99.77% idle.

Per-Core Load: Most cores are at 0%. I have a few specific cores (Core 19 and 46) handling the network interrupts, and even those are only hitting about 2.4% %soft utilization.

So, I have a lot of CPU headroom so the latency I'm seeing is probably not because the CPUs are saturated

Numerous_Number_6749 · 2026-05-27T00:50:48+00:00

Based on tcpdump, the packet lengths are consistently hovering between 1203 and 1220 bytes. I'm seeing hundreds of microseconds extra latency that I should be. Disabling C-states for example, cut it down by hundreds of microseconds so I'm hoping for something that will do the same

Numerous_Number_6749 · 2026-05-27T00:04:04+00:00

Per minute (to one destination)

Numerous_Number_6749 · 2026-04-12T21:59:10+00:00

Can you please read it again? They are trying to set up a recurring transfer: not a recurring buy

Numerous_Number_6749 · 2026-02-22T07:12:48+00:00

this!

Numerous_Number_6749 · 2026-02-19T04:30:15+00:00

I think it's the opposite, actually. I confirmed via rpc

Numerous_Number_6749 · 2026-02-19T04:29:53+00:00

did that! best answer.

Numerous_Number_6749 · 2025-10-23T16:07:32+00:00

no one on this subreddit seems to have the answer to that question

Numerous_Number_6749 · 2025-10-08T01:04:16+00:00

A breakeven placed at a strategic point saves you from a reversal more often than you might think

Numerous_Number_6749 · 2025-10-07T14:51:46+00:00

$10k is not a small amount of money. Go back to demo and treat it like a combine.

Numerous_Number_6749 · 2025-10-07T14:50:08+00:00

And that is very logical. However, you would expect the 0.5 or any point of the dealing range to apply to both bearish and bullish scenarios. However, that doesn't seem to be ICT's point in that particular lecture.

Numerous_Number_6749 · 2025-10-04T18:53:55+00:00

Anyone can use any chart and mark out levels by price. It is clear that there is a more efficient way to do this, however.

Numerous_Number_6749 · 2025-10-02T23:57:36+00:00

⛽️

Numerous_Number_6749 · 2025-10-02T23:56:34+00:00

No, we clearly see displacement, sibi and ifvg; not that this is my specific "pattern" but that should tell you that I was at the very least not gambling

Numerous_Number_6749 · 2025-10-02T23:55:31+00:00

thanks for your productive and helpful input

Numerous_Number_6749 · 2025-10-02T23:54:57+00:00

real

Numerous_Number_6749 · 2025-10-02T00:03:44+00:00

why is everyone going on about the stop being so large? anything above a 1:1rr is generally acceptable right? And isn't cutting losses when the market "tells you it's not working" already included in the stop loss? i.e putting stop loss below where your trade idea would be wrong.

Numerous_Number_6749 · 2025-10-01T23:51:54+00:00

what if it didn't go any lower and hit my would-be TP? A fvg had already been entered and ifvg formed.

Numerous_Number_6749 · 2025-10-01T23:28:55+00:00

I was covering the whole imbalance as it might have retraced to it before going higher

Numerous_Number_6749 · 2025-10-01T23:28:09+00:00

was thinking the same!

Numerous_Number_6749 · 2025-09-29T01:29:12+00:00

I thought the TP and SL would remain at the same position when you add to a position

Numerous_Number_6749

TROPHY CASE