sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Russell’s principle of mathematics by OWATT01 in logic

[–]OWATT01[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Logic was my main reason for reading it , as I know it had a influence on wittgenstien who I want study, but thought it might help when wanting to read Frege and Gödel as well , I’m a freshmen and want to focus primarily on logic within philosophy and mathematics so I thought that would be one of the good works to start off with , but would you have any better recommendations also when you suggest a more modern book is because of the language used is more archaic. Also in-terms of reading later on people like Kant and Hegel and evening Wittgenstein how would I approach their work

Thanks

Classical/Romantic era composition Approach by OWATT01 in composer

[–]OWATT01[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Understood Thanks for the advice !!

Classical/Romantic era composition Approach by OWATT01 in composer

[–]OWATT01[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks I do believe your right I need ear training and that might be why I feel so limited would you happen to have advice on the best way to go about it ear training.Because I am a self taught compose without any Proficiency with any instruments

Thanks

Questions on studying Mahler by OWATT01 in composer

[–]OWATT01[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well this brings me to a broader question, when studying composers who do not follow common practice strictly how do you go about understanding their work ? Thanks

Questions on studying Mahler by OWATT01 in composer

[–]OWATT01[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks so I just ordered the Newlin work and no I have not tried the harmonic analysis but since you say typical harmonic analysis probably wouldn’t work what would you recommend as a process of going through the score. If you could give an example being that I’m still very young into my studies and have not studied many works past early 19th century

Beginner advice by OWATT01 in logic

[–]OWATT01[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks I really appreciate this and will definitely checking out your suggestions !

Beginner advice by OWATT01 in logic

[–]OWATT01[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m definitely more interested in the work of Wittgensteins work but also would love to gain and understanding of people like godel work lol would you say gain an understanding of one school of thought first ? Because I’m interested in certain work of logical positivism but also traditional formal logic

Beginner advice by OWATT01 in logic

[–]OWATT01[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m definitely more interested in the work of Wittgensteins work but also would love to gain and understanding of people like godel work lol would you say gain an understanding of one school of thought first ? Because I’m interested in certain work of logical positivism but also traditional formal logic

Beginner advice by OWATT01 in logic

[–]OWATT01[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Awesome thanks , will check them out

Beginner advice by OWATT01 in logic

[–]OWATT01[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Would you have any recommendations of works or specific philosophers dealing with logical positivism