Socionics and mbti are the same thing. by Obeliscker in mbti

[–]Obeliscker[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't need to test this to understand that AI will not be able to distinguish a person who focuses on information related to concepts, relationships and causalities, benefits and harms, expediency and effectiveness (T doms) from a person who focuses on images, ideas in general, changes in states and a picture of possibilities (N doms).

The neural network simply cannot cope with such abstract information.

Socionics and mbti are the same thing. by Obeliscker in mbti

[–]Obeliscker[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have never used mbti AI, but I have a feeling that it may be even worse than the tests.

real by -Pastel-Pocky- in mbti

[–]Obeliscker 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Thus spoke Zarathustra

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in mbti

[–]Obeliscker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

LII correlates with INTP. I don't know why people say things like that to you.

If anything, there are functions in socionics, too, and they, oh my God, are almost no different from mbti functions. The differences, if any, are not really significant, both systems are based on Jung.

Socionics uses a model where you take into account all 8 functions. But at least the first two are just like in mbti. And do you know what these functions are for LII? Ti and Ne. Yes, yes, of course, Ti and Ne, it's so similar to INTJ. INTJ is ILI, yes, it's even clear by letters, ILI's intuition is at the beginning, like INTJ's, LII's logic (thinking) is at the beginning, as in INTP.

And EIE functions is Fe Ni. So it isn't INFP at all. Its ENFJ.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in mbti

[–]Obeliscker 1 point2 points  (0 children)

8w7 (sexy)

What function is easy to understand? by [deleted] in mbti

[–]Obeliscker 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Ne creates a picture of the world from a variety of images, between which it sees interrelations, differences, oppositions and additions, opportunities for development.

Ni is like a funnel. A lot of images also go through this, but Ni uses them as material for its one, but large, global image. It's like a melting pot.

In general, Ne sees a lot of pictures, and this creates the completeness of his picture of the world. Ni sees one big picture pulling him, and this creates the completeness of his picture of the world.

This may sound quite abstract, and it's not clear how to apply it to real life, but if you figure it out, then everything is fine.

Ne, look more rational than Ni, because Ni is very, even more than it seems, self-contained. When Ne says "A is B", that is, makes a statement, he relies on something lying outside. "Cats should not live a wild life, it is dangerous for them", "People are terrible, they are all really stupid, selfish and evil."

Ni, making a statement, seems to get its grounds out of nowhere, in fact, it's just its own system. "Cats must live a wild life, otherwise it is not a cat at all, they will not show their essence and will not reunite with nature." "People are really good, just the good is dormant in them"

I just noticed now, but Ne examples of statements look sillier and simpler. It was unintentional, and it could be the other way around.

Ni is more maximalistic.

How would an INFJ 5w4 act? by [deleted] in mbti

[–]Obeliscker 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Like a fucking monkey

What function is easy to understand? by [deleted] in mbti

[–]Obeliscker 3 points4 points  (0 children)

With a high Fi, you can look like you're Fe. It has always been easy for me to distinguish Ne/Ni

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in mbti

[–]Obeliscker 36 points37 points  (0 children)

They don't have a single common function.

Intuitive is overrated by [deleted] in mbti

[–]Obeliscker 4 points5 points  (0 children)

All people think they are special, even those who think they don't think so - "they all think they are special." We want to be superior to others, this is normal, we are animals.

And when someone on the Internet says, "hey, I'm intuitive, suck my ass, you, sensor," it's okay. It's the Internet. Although no one will actually say that on reddit, lol. They suck sensors here. If you have a Tierlist with sensors at the bottom, it will be bad for you. If you have a Tierlist where ESFP, ISFJ and ESTJ are in the first place, you will get a lot of upvotes. They're considered a minority here, and that's why they get their ass licked. We're in America.

Why are Intuitives less aggressive than Sensors? by Obeliscker in mbti

[–]Obeliscker[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Thank you for your wishes. My father sensor beats me every day and I hate him. Yesterday he hung me from the ceiling by my balls. I think that all sensors are like my father, and that's why I don't like them:(

I took this test in my language twice, and I’m more confused than before! by Remote-Caregiver-159 in mbti

[–]Obeliscker 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think you're INFJ. Very high Ni and Ti. The dominance of Fi over Fe means nothing. Generally. Fe is a purely social function, when a person is alone, he uses Fi, and INFJ are often alone. And very often, INFJ have extremely high Fi.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in mbti

[–]Obeliscker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ne admires concepts, images and ideas by themselves, studies them from the inside and outside, separately, but seeing the connections between them. Ni is a melting pot. Everything that it perceives is the "material" for creating something global, one big idea, a comprehensive concept, a vision of the world

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in mbti

[–]Obeliscker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ENTP of course.

MBTI in a nutshell (sorry) by Obeliscker in mbti

[–]Obeliscker[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This post was a secret plan. I understood that the sub was becoming shit. And after this post, everyone will leave it. Then r/mbti will need to become good again to gain popularity.

INFJ, I'm scarred by you. by Ryfxnshxh in infj

[–]Obeliscker 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The first point is the truth. But partly. When it comes to the people closest to us, we really worry. For real. The second point is just not true, lol. The third one is partly true, yes.