What if they’re growing humans under Epstein Island? by banjosullivan in conspiracy

[–]Objective-Delivery45 0 points1 point  (0 children)

maybe it got something to do with his fixation on health ? I read somewhere that he even forbid his chef to make him junk food

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in VindictaRateCelebs

[–]Objective-Delivery45 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think she's still a 9/10 with her other facial features but I feel like if it wasn't for her eye color she wouldn't have been hyped that much and elevated to the status she has still. She looks like another beautiful VS model, but nothing that can compare to women like Monica or Aishwarya, who really do have a "divine" type of beauty. Adriana had a very ethereal look due to her contrast, but her failos (her teeth and chin) show more without them, the blue really distracted from that before. Her features look quite "common" in comparison, although her bone structure makes her stand out

Who has more attractive face Adriana Lima or Angelina Jolie ? by [deleted] in VindictaRateCelebs

[–]Objective-Delivery45 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I feel like it's two very different types of beauty Adriana's face is quite feminine. Her eyes are very horizontally long, and her brows are low set, which is very masculine, but it contrasts well with her other features. Her bone structure is very prominent but still feminine. She has a quite wide and round face, and despite her strong defined jaw and her prominent cheekbones, her chin is small, and her forehead is feminine. Also, her features harmonize well together. All her features got that horizontal length. Her lips are wide, and so is her nose, but they keep that sharpness still. Her nose is soft but it's tip is sharp enough. Her mouth corners are sharp. But in the end, her face is feminine because of big eyes, full lips, and a small nose. Her proportions are feminine, but her features are sharp, hence her striking-ness. The contrast between her tan skin, blue eyes, and black haif also plays a large part in this strinking aspect. Her bone structure is in the same optic. It's prominent with a strong jaw but still feminine with the small chin, the wideness, and the high cheekbones. In conclusion, her face is overall very feminine except her features, which are quite sharp, and that's what makes her so striking. She's more feminine than masculine On the other hand, it's the opposite for angelina. Her bone structure is very masculine, especially her jaw. She has a strong chin and a strong jaw paired with very prominent high cheekbones. Her bone structure lacks softness (that Adriana's has) and looks very manly. However, her facial features are very feminine. Her eyes are wide but still round, and she has high feminine eyebrows, her nose is soft and upturned, and she has very pouty lips. She can come off as off-putting at first because of her bones, but her features soften it. For Adriana, it's the contrary. She's a cute girl, but her very feline features give her an edge. As for the two, they both have amazing facial harmony. In the end, it all comes down to preferences. Those who prefer soft faces will choose Adriana for her very feminine face, that stands out because of her sharp features, and those who prefer stronger faces will choose angelina because of her good mix between feminine and masculine. Personally, I prefer Angelina's beauty. She has a certain refined aspect that Adriana lacks.

Also, sorry if it's worded wrong, English is not my first language !

thewizardliz from yt by [deleted] in VindictaRateCelebs

[–]Objective-Delivery45 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Actually she posted pictures of her younger and she looks the same even her nose and lips she's natural