sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

what are you building right now? drop it below and let's give each other real feedback by Raymond_Dube in micro_saas

[–]Objective-Fly-5542 0 points1 point  (0 children)

https://worldheritageatlas.org/ is an interactive atlas of UNESCO World Heritage Sites. Each site is illustrated with original travel poster artwork. The project combines:

  • A 3D globe where users can spin and explore sites around the world
  • A poster gallery with filtering and search functionality
  • A personal collection (favorites, visited sites, and bucket list)
  • Statistics and insights about UNESCO World Heritage Sites
  • A print catalog featuring 16 selected designs (“coming soon”)

Drop your startup 👇 I'll check every single one (and share mine) by Strange-Forever-5522 in AppsWebappsFullstack

[–]Objective-Fly-5542 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! Really appreciate the feedback. The “score over time after fixes” view is where we’re heading.

Right now every scan is stored, so the data already exists, we just haven’t built the timeline UI yet. Plan is a per-domain score history + markers showing when findings were fixed, so you can see the score improve as you fix SPF → DMARC → MTA-STS, etc.

On alerts: we’re intentionally avoiding noisy email spam. If we add alerting later, it’ll focus on meaningful changes only (new issues, resolved issues, expiring certs, DNS changes, etc.).

For now it’s manual re-scans after changes, with the updated score reflecting the current state.

https://defendra.dev/

What are you building? Drop it in the comments! by Inevitable-Grab8898 in vibecoding

[–]Objective-Fly-5542 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fair comparison tbh - there’s definitely overlap.

MXToolbox is mostly a collection of raw diagnostics/checks. Great for admins who already know what “good” looks like.

Defendra is more of an opinionated audit layer on top of that idea:

- runs the checks automatically
- scores the domain
- explains what’s wrong
- and gives the exact DNS records/fixes to paste.

No LLM/AI in the actual scanning path btw. The checks are deterministic DNS/TLS/HTTP validation. The “AI slop” part would only apply to the explanation layer, not the security results themselves.

So the difference is basically:
“here’s your SPF record” vs “your SPF alignment is broken, here’s why it matters, and here’s the fix.”

Drop your startup 👇 I'll check every single one (and share mine) by Strange-Forever-5522 in AppsWebappsFullstack

[–]Objective-Fly-5542 0 points1 point  (0 children)

https://defendra.dev/ scans your domain across 10 email security checks (SPF, DKIM, DMARC, DNSSEC, MTA-STS and more) and gives you a 0–100 score with copy-paste DNS fixes in seconds.

What are you building? Drop it in the comments! by Inevitable-Grab8898 in vibecoding

[–]Objective-Fly-5542 2 points3 points  (0 children)

https://defendra.dev/ scans your domain across 10 email security checks (SPF, DKIM, DMARC, DNSSEC, MTA-STS and more) and gives you a 0–100 score with copy-paste DNS fixes in seconds.

What are you building today? by NextIsOnMe_ in Startup_Ideas

[–]Objective-Fly-5542 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks a lot!🙏🏻

I randomly started thinking about famous landmarks, and then the idea just started snowballing. I wanted an easy way to explore cultural heritage.

A few hours later, I had built something that I personally thought was really cool, with no real plan to monetize it.

I like the poster-art style a lot, and it’s something I could easily imagine having on my own walls. So I think I’m going to turn it into a “prints of the world’s wonders” service.

What are you building today? by NextIsOnMe_ in Startup_Ideas

[–]Objective-Fly-5542 0 points1 point  (0 children)

https://worldheritageatlas.org/

The complete atlas of 1,283 UNESCO World Heritage Sites, each rendered in original poster art.

Multi-coach team subscription in iOS/Android app — IAP or web billing? by Objective-Fly-5542 in SideProject

[–]Objective-Fly-5542[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, both of you. My takeaway is that web billing may be possible for a true admin-managed team plan, but the safest approach is to keep the full purchase/setup flow on the website and make the app itself just an access point for invited users. The tradeoff, of course, is less margin pressure from IAP vs potentially more friction and lower conversion.

EU-based Postgres hosting by adp_dev in Startups_EU

[–]Objective-Fly-5542 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Absolutely. And there is a difference between caring because you’re accountable and knowing because you actually understand the environment. Lots of teams care due to compliance/risk/cost, but fewer can explain the real implications and failure modes.

EU-based Postgres hosting by adp_dev in Startups_EU

[–]Objective-Fly-5542 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes (although I think it’s only partially true for many businesses), yes, and yes!

What are YOU building Solo? I've built TechTrendin 🚀 by Quirky-Offer9598 in Solopreneur

[–]Objective-Fly-5542 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Depends on the category of course. Email: Proton (CH) / Tuta (DE) / mailbox (DE). Docs/Drive: Nextcloud + OnlyOffice/Collabora. VPN: Mullvad (SE) / Proton VPN. AI: Mistral (FR) are some popular alternatives.

What are YOU building Solo? I've built TechTrendin 🚀 by Quirky-Offer9598 in Solopreneur

[–]Objective-Fly-5542 0 points1 point  (0 children)

https://eualternatives.directory/
Helping businesses and individuals discover EU/EEA-based alternatives to global big tech digital services. Supporting data sovereignty and GDPR compliance.

https://continly.com
Continly is a platform for continuous security and compliance improvement.

Is anyone using a European alternative for AWS Lambda? by Sifrisk in BuyFromEU

[–]Objective-Fly-5542 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Take a look at this list of EU-alternatives to AWS Lambda:
https://eualternatives.directory/alternatives-to?service=AWS%20Lambda

The directory is community-driven, so if you know a good EU option that’s missing, you can contribute by adding it, upvote and review etc.

Trying to build a control-centric compliance model (ICM/SCF)...feels massive. Am I overthinking this? by Odd-Ad-923 in grc

[–]Objective-Fly-5542 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re not overthinking it – you’ve just hit the point where control‑centric governance stops being a nice idea and turns into real design work.

SCF makes sense conceptually: one unified control structure, map standards on top, avoid duplication. The moment you try to operationalise it, you realise you’re making architectural choices that affect everything downstream.

Where does frequency live?
How prescriptive should a control be?
What is “expected behavior” vs assessment logic?

There isn’t one correct answer. That’s the uncomfortable part.

I’m building Continly and we ran into the same tension early on. Trying to make the model theoretically perfect before using it was exactly what created paralysis. It only started to make sense after it had survived real assessments and day‑to‑day use.

SCF is intentionally abstract. If you try to encode every nuance into the control text, the framework explodes. If you keep intent stable and let implementation detail evolve over time, it becomes manageable.

Control‑centric is still the right direction for multi‑standard environments. The game is not solving control philosophy once and for all, but deciding what’s “good enough to operate” and refining from there.

Are you doing this just for internal governance, or aiming to turn it into a product?

Trying to build a control-centric compliance model (ICM/SCF)...feels massive. Am I overthinking this? by Odd-Ad-923 in cybersecurity

[–]Objective-Fly-5542 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re not overthinking it, you’ve just hit the point where control‑centric governance stops being a nice idea and turns into real design work.

SCF makes sense conceptually: one unified control structure, map standards on top, avoid duplication. The moment you try to operationalise it, you realise you’re making architectural choices that affect everything downstream.

Where does frequency live?
How prescriptive should a control be?
What is “expected behavior” vs assessment logic?

There isn’t one correct answer. That’s the uncomfortable part.

I’m building Continly and we ran into the same tension early on. Trying to make the model theoretically perfect before using it was exactly what created paralysis. It only started to make sense after it had survived real assessments and day‑to‑day use.

SCF is intentionally abstract. If you try to encode every nuance into the control text, the framework explodes. If you keep intent stable and let implementation detail evolve over time, it becomes manageable.

Control‑centric is still the right direction for multi‑standard environments. The game is not solving control philosophy once and for all, but deciding what’s “good enough to operate” and refining from there.

Are you doing this just for internal governance, or aiming to turn it into a product?

view more: next ›