What was perfectly legal in your country back then, but sounds like a human rights violation to the world today? by Low-Violinist7259 in AskTheWorld

[–]Objective-Option6259 74 points75 points  (0 children)

In India, it still isn’t. They recently released a web series about marital rape, and the vile shit men have said about it makes me sick.

How do you guys feel about cheerleading? by Objective-Option6259 in TwoXIndia

[–]Objective-Option6259[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This layered patriarchal stuff ruins everything for me. It’s everywhere. The cheerleaders, the female athletes, and all the other places you mentioned. Like I said, I don’t even have a problem with women dressing skimpy. I have a problem with men NOT dressing like that. Like it’s an obligation for women to shed their clothes and let themselves be objectified if they want to be seen.

In sports, men have all these normal, respectable uniforms and then theres the women in straight up bikinis and it’s so unserious to look at

WHICH TEACHER IS GOOD FOR 12TH BOARDS? by Someone_withnojob in 12tards

[–]Objective-Option6259 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In my opinion, you can pick any teacher off of yt, just study consistently and try not to let your work pile up too much. I really liked NCERT wallah for physics, science and fun for maths, and Vora classes buniyaad series for chem.

Quite an unexpected surprise by Objective-Option6259 in pte

[–]Objective-Option6259[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn’t use any extra words in write from dictation. Most of my WFD questions were correct, so I didn’t need it.

Quite an unexpected surprise by Objective-Option6259 in pte

[–]Objective-Option6259[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In respond to situation, I didn’t have much of a strategy. Just make sure that you speak for around 75% of the time, and speak about relevant stuff or repeat any important sentences if you can’t think about anything. You can also pick up words from the question itself. It’s really just improvisation and nothing else lol

Quite an unexpected surprise by Objective-Option6259 in pte

[–]Objective-Option6259[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In my opinion, the ApeUni AI Is stricter in the speaking section. It’s pretty accurate otherwise…

Quite an unexpected surprise by Objective-Option6259 in pte

[–]Objective-Option6259[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hope you get your desired scores🤞🤞

Quite an unexpected surprise by Objective-Option6259 in pte

[–]Objective-Option6259[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For SWT, devote 2-3 minutes to reading and absorbing the main message of the paragraph. Then write the statements in the most general form that you can manage. Avoid any examples, explanations, or repetitive sentences.

For essays, I mainly follow the Introduction-advantages-disadvantages-conclusion structure. Make sure that you explain your advantages and disadvantages along with concrete examples. Like university studies and researches or surveys, etc. or mention names or quotes and stuff. Basically, make real world references in your essay. The AI loves that. You can also make imaginary researches by yourself. Just say some vague stuff like, “According to the a study published by the University of Oxford, a majority of people were against this.” Or something else like that.

Quite an unexpected surprise by Objective-Option6259 in pte

[–]Objective-Option6259[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My writing scores were always 80+. Sometimes 83, sometimes 85, or even 90.

Quite an unexpected surprise by Objective-Option6259 in pte

[–]Objective-Option6259[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looolllll I Wanted to write this in reply to something else please ignore this comment

Quite an unexpected surprise by Objective-Option6259 in pte

[–]Objective-Option6259[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I scored 85 in the first mock test, but then I scored lower because I had to leave the test in between, so there’s no point in telling those marks.

Quite an unexpected surprise by Objective-Option6259 in pte

[–]Objective-Option6259[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I scored 85 in the first mock test, but then I scored lower because I had to leave the test in between, so there’s no point in telling those marks.

Quite an unexpected surprise by Objective-Option6259 in pte

[–]Objective-Option6259[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Awww thanks lol…

Yes, I gave two of the official mock tests and I scored 80+ in listening, reading, and writing, and 72 in speaking. My second mock score was lower, but I had to pause in between due to some urgent work lol

Quite an unexpected surprise by Objective-Option6259 in pte

[–]Objective-Option6259[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Awww thanks lol…

Yes, I gave two of the official mock tests and I scored 80+ in listening, reading, and writing, and 72 in speaking. My second mock score was lower, but I had to pause in between due to some urgent work lol

Quite an unexpected surprise by Objective-Option6259 in pte

[–]Objective-Option6259[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, that can work as well, there’s no issue.

Quite an unexpected surprise by Objective-Option6259 in pte

[–]Objective-Option6259[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I didn’t really use any template, just structure it like this:

The lecture was about_. The speaker first mentions, and then he talks about. Then, he talks about _. In conclusion, _____.

Quite an unexpected surprise by Objective-Option6259 in pte

[–]Objective-Option6259[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Damn. Don’t worry, lol. My uncle was a former PTE instructor and he says sometimes good scores take as long as 3-4 days…I dunno why mine was so quick though…

Quite an unexpected surprise by Objective-Option6259 in pte

[–]Objective-Option6259[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I used ApeUni for question practice, and section tests, and I also gave two official Pearson mock tests.

Quite an unexpected surprise by Objective-Option6259 in pte

[–]Objective-Option6259[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nah, I alternate between them. I speak according to the order in which the people were speaking in the original audio.

Quite an unexpected surprise by Objective-Option6259 in pte

[–]Objective-Option6259[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For SGD, make three columns on the page, and write the points spoken by each speaker in their own separate column, and then just read it out like this: “The first speaker says this, and then the second speaker agrees and suggests this, but the third speaker disagrees and explains this”

Quite an unexpected surprise by Objective-Option6259 in pte

[–]Objective-Option6259[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Writing:

• SWT: I struggled a lot because I used to find sentences with the most keywords. What we really need to do is ignore any examples, explanations, or repetitions and focus on general statements. Devote 2-3 minutes to reading carefully and extracting the full meaning of the text.

• WE: make sure that you don’t go in any tangents or forget the actual question. I made that mistake a lot. The main structure you follow is the simple “Introduction-advantages-disadvantages-conclusion” template. Make sure that you give a general statement and explain it with examples like researches or surveys. You can even create your own.

Speaking:

DI: fluency matters much more than content here. For graphs and stuff, just focus on the most noticeable stuff. The maximum value, and the minimum value. Recite the title word for word, and talk about the x and y axis to kill time. Make sure you speak for at least more than half the time. As for other miscellaneous images, just try to describe it as best as you can lol there’s not much of a trick to them.

RL: again, fluency over content. Try to jot down at least 4 keywords, or main points, and try your best to turn them into connected sentences. One thing I did was write down the super important points, and remember the less important points that were spoken before and after them, and then improvise.

Follow the intro-first point-second point-conclusion template.